The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using humanomni2.5 8

1

CNV Detection in Autism Spectrum Disorder Families

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ASD families were genotyped on the Illumina Infinium® 1Mv1 (338 families), Infinium® 1Mv3 Duo (1,191 families) or the HumanOmni2.5-8 (996 families) microarrays (Illumina Inc, USA). All three microarray types had over 180 probes within the BP1-BP2 region. CNV prediction was performed by PennCNV (PN) [Wang et al. 2007 (link)], QuantiSNP (QT) [Colella et al. 2007 (link)], and Gnosis [Sanders et al. 2011 (link)], using CNVision [Sanders et al. 2011 (link)]. Detailed CNV detection protocol was described in [Sanders et al. 2011 (link)]. Sample identity within the family, including correct assignment of paternity and maternity, was confirmed using genetically-inferred identity by descent for all study participants including the de novo deletion of BP1-BP2 in a proband.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multi-Omics Analysis of Cerebellar and DLPFC Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from 100 mg of pulverized cerebellar tissue and DLPFC tissue with the phenol-chloroform method. SNP genotyping with HumanHap650Y, Human 1M-Duo BeadChips, HumanOmni5-Quad or HumanOmni2.5–8 (Illumina, San Diego, CA) was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions with DNA extracted from cerebellar tissue. The methylation and genotype data were extracted from a larger data set from one of our recent studies52 (link). In brief, methylation of DNA extracted from DLPFC was assessed according to the manufacturer’s instruction using the Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip Kit (Illumina), which measure DNA methylation of more than 485,000 CpG dinucleotides (cg) covering 99% RefSeq gene promoters, including the CNR1 gene. The methylation data were processed and normalized using the minfi Bioconductor package in R53 (link) as previously described52 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Whole-blood DNA Genotyping and Genome Alignment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole-blood samples were collected from the donor and recipient. DNA was purified from whole blood (DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit, Qiagen) and amplified (REPLI-g Mini Kit, Qiagen). Genotyping was performed on Illumina whole-genome arrays (HumanOmni2.5-8 or HumanOmni1). We found discrepancies in the definitions of the forward and reverse strand for the hg19 genome build (used for alignment of the sequencing data) and the genotyping database for ∼1% of SNPs on the microarray. These discrepancies gave rise to systematic erroneous assignments, an issue that was resolved by removing these SNPs from the analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genetic Profiling of AMD Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNAs were extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes using QuickGene-610L DNA extraction kit (FUJIFILM Co., Tokyo, Japan). Genotyping was performed using Illumina BeadChip, both OmniExpress and HumanExome, HumanOmni2.5–8, or OmniExpress. The distortion of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was not considered in this study because all samples comprised AMD cases. Stringent quality control, including minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥ 1% and genotype call rate ≥ 95% (per SNP and per individual), was performed using PLINK ver1.07 (http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/~purcell/plink/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

LEPR Gene Genotyping Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted according to the protocol described by Gentra®® Puregene®® Blood Kit Qiagen (Germantown, ML, USA), while quantification was standardized at a concentration of 50 ng/μL and identified in barcoded tubes. This step was performed using a Qubit fluorometer® (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) [19 (link)]. The LEPR genetic information was extracted between positions 65,886,335 and 66,103,176 on chromosome 1 and genotyping for all 149 SNVs of the LEPR gene was conducted on the HumanOmni2.5-8 platform using the BeadChip kit (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genome-wide Association Study of Nagahama Cohort

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was prepared from peripheral blood samples according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Samples from 5299 participants who joined the Nagahama cohort from 2008 to 2009 were used for the genome-wide SNP genotyping. The analysis was performed with HumanHap610 Quad (1830 samples), HumanOmni2.5-4 (1616 samples), HumanOmni2.5-8 (378 samples), HumanOmni2.5 s (672 samples), CoreExome24 (1728 samples), and HumanExome (304 samples; Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).
As a stringent quality control (QC), SNPs with a call rate of less than 99%, minor allele frequency of less than 1%, and significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P < 1.0 × 10−6), and samples with a call rate of <95% were excluded from the analysis. After this QC, 333 participants with estimated first- or second-degree kinship within Nagaham cohort samples (pi-hat > 0.35, PLINK ver. 1.07 [http://zzz.bwh.harvard.edu/plink/]) were also excluded.
Genotype imputation was performed using MACH software (http://www.sph.umich.edu/csg/abecasis/MACH/tour/imputation.html) with the 1000 genomes dataset (phase3 v5 release) as a reference panel. Imputed SNPs for which R2 was less than 0.5 were excluded from the following association analysis. Finally, 4,710,779 SNPs from 4476 individuals were used for the discovery stage analysis. Of the 4476 samples, 14 lacked data of axial length.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cytogenetic Profiling of Hematologic Malignancies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA copy numbers were assessed using Illumina CytoSNP-12 and HumanOmni2.5-8 microarrays and read out using the iScan array scanner. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis was performed for del(11)(q22.3), del(17)(p13), del(13)(q14), trisomy 12, gain(8)(q24), and gain(14)(q32). Only alterations present and absent in at least three patients were considered for analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in CLL

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA copy numbers were assessed using Illumina CytoSNP-12 and HumanOmni2.5-8 microarrays (n = 169). DNA (200 ng) was processed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Arrays were read out using the iScan array scanner. Copy number variants were verified by using the exome sequencing data (n = 107). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis was performed for del11q22.3 (n = 162), del17p13 (n = 159), del13q14 (n = 155), trisomy 12 (n = 152), del6q21 (n = 132), and gain8q24 (n = 125). Information on structural variants from FISH, exome sequencing, and SNP arrays was combined into 1 table (n = 219).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!