The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

35 protocols using sleepsign software

1

Polysomnographic Signal Acquisition and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analogue biopotential signals were sampled at 256 Hz, amplified (Grass 15LT) and filtered at 0.1 and 100 Hz with a notch filter of 60 Hz (Link 15 software). Filtered signals were collected using Vital Recorder software (Kissei Comtec) and digitised (A/D board; National Instruments) on a XPS i7 CPU (Dell) for subsequent analyses. File names were de‐identified for treatment through the assignment of non‐rapid eye movement sleep (NREM), REM, or wake state, files were then sorted based on treatment for further analysis. The NREM, REM, and waking vigilance states were determined manually off‐line in 10‐s epochs by trained technicians using SleepSign software (Kissei Comtec). NREM sleep was identified by high‐amplitude EEG signals and low EMG activity. Regular low‐amplitude EEG and minimal EMG activity characterised REM sleep. Wake periods were recognised by low amplitude fast EEG and high amplitude EMG activity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Simultaneous EEG/EMG Recordings in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After a 2–3 week recovery period, each mouse was individually housed in a recording chamber and habituated to the recording cable for 2–3 days before electrophysiological recordings. Simultaneous EEG/EMG recordings were carried out with a slip ring so that movement of the mice would not be restricted. For experiments using DREADDs, the recordings started at 07:00 (i.e., at the beginning of the light period), and each mouse received either vehicle or CNO (3 mg/kg, C2041, LKT) treatment for two consecutive days at 09:00 (inactive period) or 21:00 (active period). As previously described (Ren et al., 2018 (link); Zhong et al., 2021 (link)), EEG/EMG signals were amplified and filtered (0.5–30 Hz for EEG, 40–200 Hz for EMG), and were then digitized at 128 Hz and recorded with SleepSign software (Kissei Comtec, Nagano, Japan). Sleep–wake states were automatically classified into 4 s epochs as follows: Wakefulness was considered to have desynchronized EEG and high levels of EMG activity, NREM sleep was considered to have synchronized, high-amplitude, low-frequency (0.5–4 Hz) EEG signals in the absence of motor activity; and REM sleep was considered to have pronounced theta-like (4–9 Hz) EEG activity and muscle atonia. All scoring was automated based on EEG and EMG waveforms in 4 s epochs for both chemogenetic and optogenetic studies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Electromyographic Assessment of Neuromuscular Disorders

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EMGs were obtained from calf, hamstring, triceps and paraspinal muscles with concentric needle electrodes in isoflurane anaesthetized male mice at 30 weeks of age (n = 5 per genotype). Young wild-type and non-affected males at 8–9 weeks of age (n = 4 per genotype), and 60-week-old wild-type and non-hind-limb dragging females (n = 4 per genotype) were also evaluated.
For chronic EMG, three draggen male mice were implanted with a wireless EMG system (Data Sciences F20-EET, Gold system). A transmitter was surgically implanted through an incision on the back, with leads from the transmitter leading, subcutaneously, to the right hind-limb. Two electrodes for the EMGs were attached to the gastrocnemius muscle. The surgeries were conducted with the mouse under ketamine–xylanine anaesthesia. A post-surgery period of 1 week was given to each mouse to ensure a full recovery. At the end of the recovery period, we recorded the EMG signal uninterruptedly. Sampling rate was 500 Hz and data were processed using SleepSign software (Kissei Comtec). The mice were singly housed and free to move in the cage. We continuously acquired videos with a computer synchronized with the EMG recordings. Videos were visually scored and immobility attacks were identified by at least two independent observers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Ashwagandha Leaf Extract Effects on Sleep-Wake Patterns

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 8–10 days of post-operative recovery, the mice were placed in experimental cages for a 4-day habituation/acclimatization period and connected with counterbalanced recording leads. Baseline EEG/EMG was recorded for 24 h starting onset of dark phase. All mice that were subjected to EEG/EMG recordings received vehicle and multiple doses of Ashwagandha leaf extracts or pure TEG (10 mg, 20 mg, and 30 mg/mouse) on different days and any two administrations were separated by, at least, 2 days. Each EEG/EMG recording and drug administration was performed per os (p.o.), at the onset of dark phase (17:00 h). Cortical EEG and EMG signals were amplified and filtered (EEG, 0.5–30 Hz; EMG, 20–200 Hz), then digitized at a sampling rate of 128 Hz, and recorded by using SleepSign software (Kissei Comtec, Nagano, Japan) as previously described [19 ]. Polysomnographic recordings were scored with automated analysis, off-line, in 10-s epochs as wakefulness, rapid eye movement (REM) and non-REM (NREM) sleep by SleepSign software, using standard criteria [19 , 20 (link)]. The defined sleep–wake stages were visually examined and corrected, wherever necessary. Spectral analysis of EEG by fast Fourier transformation (FFT) was performed, and the EEG power densities of each 0.5- Hz bin were averaged by calculating the percentage of each bin with respect to the total power in the range of 0.5–35 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Optogenetic Modulation of Cortical EEG and Burst Suppression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All of the EEG/EMG signals during optogenetic experiments were recorded and analyzed by the SleepSign software (Kissei Comtec). The amplified EEG/EMG data were collected at 128 Hz sampling rate. In the experiment exploring the effect of optogenetics on cortical EEG under 0.8% isoflurane anesthesia, the EEG frequency band (δ, 0.5–4.0 Hz; θ, 4.0–7.0 Hz; α, 8.0–15.0 Hz; β, 16.0–30.0 Hz) used fast Fourier transform to calculate the relative change in the total power of BF-GABAergic neurons within 120 s before, during, and after photostimulation. The burst suppression ratio (BSR) is a widely adopted method for quantifying burst suppression. For the optogenetic experiments of burst suppression oscillation, raw EEG data recorded by SleepSign software were converted to text format for further analysis of BSR using MATLAB R2019b (Bao et al., 2021 (link)). Finally, the BSR changes in BF-GABAergic neurons within 120 s before, during, and after photostimulation were calculated. The details of BSR analysis are provided in the Extended Data 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Implantation and Acquisition of EEG/EMG Signals in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For EEG and EMG recordings, mice were implanted with a head mount (Pinnacle Technology Inc., Laurence, KS, USA) parallel to the sagittal suture. Four stainless steel screws were placed 1.5 mm lateral to the sagittal suture, 2.0 mm anterior of bregma, and 4.0 mm posterior to bregma to record EEG signals. EMG signals were acquired by a pair of multi-stranded stainless steel wires inserted into the neck extensor muscles. One week after surgery, animals were habituated for 3 days before EEG/EMG signals were acquired with a 3-channel EEG/EMG tethered system (Pinnacle Technology Inc.) and digitalised by SIRENIA SLEEP PRO® software (Pinnacle Technology). EEG and EMG data were recorded in 10 s epochs and automatically scored by Sleep Sign® software (Kissei Comtec, Matsumoto, Japan). Automatically scored data were manually inspected and corrected if required.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Sleep Staging and Spindle Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The EEG/EMG signals were amplified and filtered (EEG: 0.5–64 Hz, EMG: 16–64 Hz), then digitised at a sampling rate of 128 Hz, and recorded using SLEEPSIGN software47 (link) (Kissei Comtec). In addition, locomotor activity was recorded with an infrared photocell sensor (Biotex). The vigilance states were scored offline by characterising 10-s epochs into three stages, including awake, SWS and REM sleep, according to standard criteria46 . As a final step, defined vigilance stages were examined visually, and corrected when necessary. Spindles during SWS were analysed as previously reported48 (link). In brief, EEG was bandpass-filtered (10–13 Hz) to visually identify sleep spindles from the raw EEG signals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Automated Sleep Monitoring in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Video PSG recordings were performed as previously
described.16 (link) Briefly, mice were connected
to the device and habituated for 3 days prior to formal recording.
Cortical EEG and cervical EMG signals were digitized at a sampling
rate of 512 Hz, amplified, filtered (Biotex), and then recorded through
a CED 1401 digitizer and Spike 2 software (CED, UK). The Spike 2 data
were then converted to appreciable vigilance states using SleepSign
software (Kissei Comtec, Japan). By this method, the alertness states
of the mice (scored every 4 s timing) were automatically classified
as wake, rapid eye movement sleep (REM), and non-rapid eye movement
sleep (NREM). The sleep classification was then manually checked and
corrected in case of incompatibility. After manual calibration and
correction, the number, percentage, transition, and duration of each
alert state were calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multimodal Sleep-Wake Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The EEG/EMG signals were amplified and filtered (EEG: 0.5–64 Hz, EMG: 16–64 Hz), then digitised at a sampling rate of 128 Hz, and recorded using SLEEPSIGN software (Kohtoh et al., 2008 (link)) (Kissei Comtec). In addition, locomotor activity was recorded with an infrared photocell sensor (Biotex). The vigilance states were scored offline by 10 s epochs into three stages, including waking, SWS, and REM sleep, according to standard criteria (Oishi et al., 2016 (link)). As a final step, defined vigilance stages were examined visually, and corrected when necessary.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Mouse Sleep Stage Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sleep stage analysis by human experts was conducted based on visual characteristics of EEG and EMG waveforms with the help of FFT and video surveillance of mouse movement. The EEG dataset consisted of 214 recordings in total. In most cases, two recordings on two consecutive days were obtained from each mouse. Recordings were divided into 10-s epochs. FFT analysis was performed using Sleep Sign software (KISSEI COMTEC).
Wakefulness was defined by continuous mouse movement or de-synchronized low-amplitude EEG with tonic EMG activity. NREM was defined by dominant high-amplitude, low-frequency delta waves (1–4 Hz) accompanied by less EMG activity than that observed during wakefulness. REM was defined as dominant theta rhythm (6–9 Hz) and the absence of tonic muscle activity. If a 10-s epoch contained more than one sleep stage (i.e., NREM, REM, or wakefulness), the most represented stage was assigned for the epoch. At least two experts agreed on the classification of each recording.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!