The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Topo ta cloning vector

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The TOPO TA cloning vector is a plasmid-based system used for the direct cloning of Taq polymerase-amplified PCR products. It provides a convenient and efficient method for the insertion of PCR fragments into a plasmid vector without the need for restriction enzyme digestion or ligation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

84 protocols using topo ta cloning vector

1

Targeted Sequencing of NOTCH1 and FBXW7 in T-LBL

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was obtained from tumor tissue biopsies or pleural/pericardial effusion of T-LBL cases, as described previously [24 (link)]. Exons 26 and 27, encoding for NOTCH1 heterodimerization domain (HD), exon 34, encoding the transactivation domain (TAD) and PEST domains, and FBXW7 exons 9, 10 and 12 were amplified as previously reported [4 (link)]. PCR products were sequenced on a 3500 DX Genetic Analyzer (Life Technologies, CA, USA), either directly or after subcloning into Topo TA cloning vector (Life Technologies). GeneBank accession numbers NM_017617.3 and NM_033632.3 were used as reference sequences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

TOPO-TA Cloning and dsRNA Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PCR product was subsequently cloned into the TOPO-TA cloning vector (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), and cells were transformed with this plasmid. The purified plasmid DNA was sequenced to confirm the identity of the cloned gene and the accuracy of the insertion into the TOPO vector. The plasmid DNA was linearized using Spe1 and Not1 restriction enzymes (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) and subsequently used for single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) synthesis. ssRNA was synthesized using MEGAscript T3 and T7 kits (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The complementary ssRNA were then combined and annealed to form a 2 µg/µl dsRNA solution using a standard annealing protocol [83] (link). The final annealed product was analyzed via gel electrophoresis to ensure proper annealing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Sequencing Antibiotic Resistance Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Amplified products of blaNDM, blaVIM, blaVEB, blaPER, blaAmpC, blaCTX−M were sequenced directly on both strands using Big dye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit and analyzed with an automated sequencer (ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer, Perkin Elmer, USA). The blaNDM in some isolates could not be directly sequenced and were cloned into a TOPO TA cloning vector (Life technologies) and sequenced with the M13 primers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cloning-Free PCR for DNA Constructs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DNA constructs used in this study were generated using cloning free PCR (Erdeniz et al., 1997 (link)). The primers used to generate the PCR fragments are listed in Table 1. Yeast genomic DNA from W303 or B4060 was used as the template to generate the PCR fragments. For each construct two separate PCR fragments were generated. One fragment encompassed the 5′-UTR and ORF and the second fragment contained the 3′-UTR. The 5′-UTR and ORF fragments were then fused to the 3′-UTR fragment using cloning free PCR. The 5′-UTR and ORF fragments generated by PCR were for CYC1 and SSY5 genes using the primers listed in Table 1. The CYC1 5′-UTR and ORF fragment was fused to the SSY5 3′-UTR to generate the CYC1-SSY5 3′-UTR fragment. The SSY5 5′-UTR and ORF was fused to either the CYC1 3′-UTR or the cyc1-512 3′-UTR to generate the SSY5-CYC1 3′-UTR fragment and the SSY5-cyc1-512 3′-UTR fragment respectively. The fusion DNA fragments were then inserted into the TOPO-TA cloning vector according to the manufacturer's instructions (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). All DNA fusion constructs generated by PCR were sequenced to confirm that they were error free and that precise fusions were generated. After sequencing the fusion constructs were subcloned out of the TOPO-TA cloning vector and inserted into the high copy yeast vector pRS425 (Sirkosky and Heiter, 1989 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of HOXB9-miR-196a-1 Transcript

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To investigate the presence of a common HOXB9-miR-196a-1 primary transcript (PT), primers were designed that spanned the 6.3Kb between HOXB9 exon1 and miR-196a-1 precursor transcript (forward: 5’ AATTAGGTAGTTTCATGTTGTTGGGCC 3’; reverse: 5’ ATAATAGCTGCTAAGCGTCCC AGAAAT 3’). For the reverse transcription step, primary transcript primers were used with M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega, Southampton, UK), followed by PCR using the same primers (product 6.3kB). Nested primers were designed to give a 295bp product within this transcript (forward: 5’ AAAGTCAGGGCAGGAGAGGGAAGGGGAA 3’, reverse: 5’ CAATTTGCCAGCCCTATGAAGTCTGCT 3’), with RNaseA treated (RNA was incubated for 1 hour at 37°C with 100μg/ml RNaseA (Promega, Southampton, UK) and no-reverse transcriptase (RT) controls. The PCR products were separated on a 2% (w/v) agarose gel, visualised under UV transillumination and purified using gel extraction kit (Bioline, London, UK). This product was then cloned into TOPO TA Cloning vector (Life Technologies, Paisley, UK) and positive colonies were selected using blue/white screening, purified using Isolate plasmid mini kit (Bioline, London, UK) and sequenced.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Generating Transgenic Fly Lines for ATP Synthase

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ATPsynC cDNA (Annotation symbol: CG1746) was isolated from wild type embryonic RNA by RT-PCR using SuperScript III (Life Technologies) and primers (5’-GCCTGTCACCCAATATCTCC-3’) and (5’-TGCCAACATGTCAAGCAGTAA-3’). The cDNA was cloned into the TOPO-TA Cloning vector (Life Technologies) and modified by site-directed mutagenesis with QuikChange II (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). Mutagenesis primers for the human-disease-equivalent p.N102K were (5’-CGGCTACGCCAGGAAGCCATCGCTGAAA-3’) and (5’-TTTCAGCGATGGCTTCCTGGCGTAGCCG-3’). For the E. coli equivalent mutation p.N102E, the primers were (5’-ATCGGCTACGCCAGGGAGCCATCGCTGAAACAG-3’) and (5’-CTGTTTCAGCGATGGCTCCCTGGCGTAGCCGAT-3’). The wild-type, p.N102K and p.N102E mutant constructs were then cloned into the pUAST-attB expression vector.21 (link) Transgenic fly lines containing a single copy of each UAS construct, specifically integrated at the 51C locus on chromosome 2, were generated using phi3C integrase (performed by Rainbow Transgenic Flies, Inc, Camarillo, CA). Each UAS line was subsequently crossed to either the armadillo (arm)-Gal4, elav-Gal4, tub-Gal4, or 24B2-Gal4 driver lines available from the Bloomington Stock Center. All Drosophila lines were cultured and experiments performed at 25°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Identification of Genomic-Proviral Junctions via LAM-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To identify the genomic-proviral junction sequence, linear amplification-mediated polymerase chain reaction (LAM-PCR) was performed as described previously, with minor modifications [27] (link), [28] (link). In brief, genomic DNA from bone marrow cells was first digested with Tsp509I. A linear amplification of target DNA in the digested genome was performed by repeated primer extension using a vector-specific 5′-biotinylated primer, LTR1.5, and Taq polymerase. After selection with Dynabeads MyOne Streptavidin C1 (Life Technologies), a double-stranded asymmetrical linker cassette was ligated to the Tsp509I-digested site using T4 DNA Ligase. The DNA products were then amplified by PCR using a vector-specific primer, LTR3, and linker cassette primer, LC1. The nested PCR was performed using internal primers LTR5 and LC2. The final products were sequenced after cloning them into the TOPO TA cloning vector (Life Technologies). The primer sequences are shown in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

TET1 CpG Island Methylation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was isolated from cells by using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer's instructions. For detection of TET1 CpG island methylation, genomic DNA was subjected to digestion with the methylation-sensitive enzyme HpaII (New England Bioloabs) and the methylation-insensitive enzyme MspI (New England Bioloabs) for 16 hrs at 37°C. Products from digestion were diluted and used as template for PCR reactions performed by using 5 PRIME MasterMix (5 PRIME) with specific primers (reported in Supplementary Methods). For bisulfite sequencing assay, genomic DNA was converted by using EZ DNA Methylation Kit (Zymo research). Amplification of the region of interest in TET1 CpG island was performed using 5 PRIME MasterMix (5 PRIME) and a specific primer pair (reported in Supplementary Methods). Fragment cloning was performed using TOPO TA-cloning vector (Life Technologies) and individual inserts from randomly selected clones were sequenced.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

LINE Element Amplification and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We amplified by PCR a 356-bp cDNA fragment of the assembled LINE from bp 1512 to bp 1868 using the following primers:

LINE forward 5′-GGGTCAGAAAGTGACGAGGA-3′

LINE reverse 5′-TGCATGAGGCGGAGTTTAG-3′

The choice of the fragment and the design of primers have been based on manual curation steps ensuring that the chosen fragment is present exclusively in the transcript of the identified LINE element and in no other assembled transcripts. The amplified fragment was cloned into TOPO® TA Cloning® vector (Life Technologies, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Cloned fragment was digested using BAMHI and ECORV restriction enzymes and validated by Sanger sequencing. Sense and antisense digoxigenin-labeled RNA probes were generated by in vitro transcription using the DIG-RNA Labeling Kit (SP6/T7; Roche Applied Sciences, QC, Canada). Labeled RNA probes were quantified by dot blot analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

MHV68 BAC DNA Mutation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cell DNA from the co-transfection experiments was extracted as outlined above. The DNA was digested with 20 units of Dpn1 (New England Biolabs, Ipswich MA) for 12 hours at 37°C to remove input MHV68 BAC DNA. Two regions in the MHV68 genome (bp 69,873– 70,761 and bp 88,884 to 89,613) were amplified with Dynazyme II DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific, Waltham MA), cloned into the TOPO TA cloning vector (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) and sequenced to identify mutations that arose during infection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!