The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Aquilion one vision edition

Manufactured by Toshiba
Sourced in Japan

The Aquilion ONE ViSION Edition is a computed tomography (CT) scanner developed by Toshiba. It features a large 78 cm gantry aperture and 16 cm detector coverage, enabling it to capture whole-organ volumes in a single rotation. The system is designed to provide high-resolution imaging capabilities for a variety of clinical applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

19 protocols using aquilion one vision edition

1

Quantitative Pulmonary Vein Ablation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The details of the cardiac CT and LAWT measurement are described in Supplementary material online, the Supplemental Methods. In brief, a cardiac CT was performed using an Aquilion ONE ViSION Edition CT scanner (Toshiba Medical Systems, Japan). The LAWT was measured by CT using the commercially available software package zioM900 (Zio Software Inc., Tokyo). The anterior and posterior wall thickness of each PV (right superior PV: RSPV; right-inferior PV: RIPV; left superior PV: LSPV; and left inferior PV: LIPV) as well as the roof and bottom of the RPV or LPV of the PV-ostia were analysed (six segments each of bilateral PVs). The centre of each segment was used for LAWT measurement. Whether the LAWT can be measured on the ablation line was confirmed by merging the 3D-CT image with the 3D-electroanatomical map and the ablation tag reflected on it created by the CARTO system. By using the coronal or axial view, LAWT measurements were performed. The bipolar and unipolar voltages were measured at three adjacent points on the ablation line centring on the LAWT measurement site, and the average of these voltages was taken as representative. All measurements were performed by two investigators blinded to the study groups; discrepancies were adjudicated by a third investigator.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cardiac CT Imaging Protocol for Varying BMI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients underwent cardiac CT on a 320-detector CT scanner (Aquilion ONE ViSION Edition, Toshiba Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan). The acquisition parameters were: 240, 280, or 320 × 0.5-mm detector collimation, 275-ms tube rotation time, 270–800 mAs tube current-time product with automatic exposure control (noise index, 20), and 80-, 100-, or 120-kVp tube voltage, according to the patient body mass index (BMI) (80 kVp for BMI < 21; 100 kVp for BMI 21–25; 120 kVp for BMI >25). The CT images were reconstructed using the adaptive iterative reconstruction technique (AIDR 3D, Toshiba Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Coronary Plaque Assessment via CCTA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eligible patients who consented to receive CCTA were scanned on a 320 detector row unit (Aquilion ONE ViSION Edition; Toshiba Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan) using standard techniques during their baseline visits on the same day that fasting blood samples were drawn. We evaluated CCTA data in all patients who had analyzable scans and evaluated all three epicardial coronary arteries individually. Plaque morphology and composition were then analyzed using the dedicated software program, QAngio CT (Medis, The Netherlands). Total, non-calcified, and dense-calcified plaque burden were quantified on the basis of pre-defined Hounsfield unit ranges. Indices for total, non-calcified and dense-calcified plaque burden were then calculated by dividing the plaque volume of each vessel by its total length, attenuated for luminal intensity. We report total burden, non-calcified and dense-calcified burden for each patient13 (link), 23 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MSCT imaging was performed using a 320-multidetector scanner (Aquilion One Vision Edition, Toshiba Medical Systems, Japan). Contrast phase was reconstructed in 0.5 mm slice thickness with 0.25 mm increment; non-contrast phase was reconstructed in 3.0 mm slice thickness with 3.0 mm increment (see online supplementary file S1).
All MSCT images were analysed using the commercially available Osirix software package. Preprocedural LAA assessment and sizing was performed by 3D multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) using the end-diastolic phase series. 3D MPR allows assessment of the LAA anatomy in three different planes (sagittal, coronal and axial) locked at 90° angles. LAA morphology was classified into windsock, chicken wing, cactus and cauliflower. The LAA ostium and landing zone for the different devices were identified and the minimal diameter, maximal diameter and perimeter of these axial LAA views were measured.
All patients included in this study also received a control MSCT scan at 3 months postprocedure for assessment of LAA closure device position, device compression, peridevice leakage and device-related thrombosis. In case of no contrast leakage into the LAA, the LAA closure was considered successful.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multislice CT Imaging of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Multislice CT studies were performed immediately on occlusion of the LAD using a 320 detector row scanner (Aquilion ONE Vision Edition, Toshiba Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan). The animals were supine, and the scans were acquired in volume mode during a breath hold. A standardized imaging protocol was applied using the following parameters: 0.5 mm slice thickness, 275 ms tube rotation time, 80 kV tube voltage, 750 mA tube current. Arterial phase first pass imaging was performed with continuous acquisition over 30 s with ECG gating during intravenous administration of iodinated contrast (Isovue 370, Bracco Diagnostics, Princeton, NJ, USA) 2 mL/kg divided into two injections to minimize beam hardening effects: contrast 0.8 mL/kg followed by 0.8 mL/kg saline bolus at a rate of 0.8 mL/s was immediately followed by contrast 1.2 and 1.2 mL/kg saline at a rate of 1.2 mL/s. Continuous imaging with ECG gating over five heartbeats was then acquired every minute starting at 60 s after initiation of contrast administration until minute five. Images were reconstructed at 0.5 mm slice thickness using standard cardiac kernels (FC03) with iterative reconstruction (AIDR3D) at multiple cardiac phases. Images with the least amount of motion artifact were selected for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating CT Characteristics for Lung Biopsy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All target lesion imaging data were collected from CT images with a 0.5-mm slice thickness generated using a non-enhanced multidetector CT system (Aquilion One Vision Edition; Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) within 1 month before bronchoscopy. We collected data on the size, location, characteristics (GGOs vs. solid), CT bronchus sign (A–C, with A being the responsible bronchus that clearly reached the inside of the target lesion and C being no detectable responsible bronchus. If neither type A nor type C was concluded, the CT bronchus sign was categorized as type B) [3 (link)], existence of pleural involvement (contact or indentation), and GGO-dominant nodules (consolidation-to-tumor ratio [CTR] of < 0.5) designated as ground-glass nodules [GGNs]) [12 ]. In this study, we defined lung segments with a sagittal orientation on fluoroscopy (right: S2a, S3b, S5ab, S6a, S6c, S10a, S10c; left: S1 + 2b, S3b, S5ab, S6a, S6c, S10a, S10c) as “lung segments in a sagittal direction.” We focused on these segments because we could not easily recognize the pleural edge in the sagittal direction under fluoroscopic guidance. Thus, the positional relationship between the biopsy forceps and the pleura was difficult to recognize.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Optimized CT Imaging Protocol for Detailed Visualization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT scans were performed on a 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scanner (Light-Speed General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA), acquisition parameters: 120 kV, 100 mA with auto dose reduction, pitch 1, rotation time 0.5 s, field of view (FOV) 400×400 mm and slice thickness 0.625 mm; or a 320 detector-row CT system (Aquilion ONE/ViSION edition; Toshiba Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan), acquisition parameters: kV 120, modulated mA, pitch (standard pitch factor 0.813 and helical pitch 65), rotation time 0.275, FOV 500 L and slice thickness 0.5 mm. Intravenous contrast agents were administered with a dose of 100 mL (agent Ultravist 300; Bayer Schering, Berlin, Germany) at a rate of 5 mL·s−1. Contiguous slices were acquired during an inspiratory breath-hold.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Suboccipital Muscle Anatomy and Occipital Artery Patterns

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The running pattern and relationship between the suboccipital muscles and OA were retrospectively analyzed using operation videos and preoperative enhanced computed tomography (CT) images by the author and discussed with other neurosurgeons. Head CT was performed using a 320- row CT scanner Aquilion ONE VISION edition (Toshiba Medical Systems, Tochigi, Japan). All scans were analyzed in their original format with a 0.5 mm slice thickness scaled to Level 60/Window 200.
The longissimus capitis muscle (LNG) is inserted posterior to the margin of the mastoid process. It is easy to identify the insertion and follow the running course of the LNG using thin-slice CT by changing the window width and level. The other muscles that enter the mastoid process, such as the posterior belly of the digastric muscle and the splenius capitis muscle (SPL), can be distinguished by their insertion and running course [Figure 1]. The running patterns of the OA were classified into two types: lateral type, running lateral to the LNG and medial type, running medial to the LNG.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Dual-Source and Adaptive CT Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study was performed using a 128-slice DSCT scanner (SOMATOM Definition Flash; Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) and a 320-row ADCT scanner (Aquilion ONE ViSION Edition; Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan). The DSCT scanner is equipped with two X-ray tubes and two 64-row detector arrays mounted into the gantry with an angular offset of approximately 90°. The ADCT scanner is equipped with 320-row detector arrays that can obtain coverage of up to 160 mm in the z-direction. Image data obtained using the two CT scanners were transferred to a dedicated computer using the Digital Image and Communication in Medicine transfer protocol (DICOM) and were analysed using ImageJ image analysis software (ver. 1.47i; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) [14] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Unenhanced CT Evaluation of Hepatic Fat Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unenhanced CT evaluation of the liver was performed with a 16‐slice multi‐detector CT (MDCT) (IDT16, PHILIPS), a 40‐slice MDCT (PHILIPS), a 64‐slice MDCT (PHILIPS), and 320‐slice MDCT (Aquilion ONE Vision Edition, TOSHIBA). Unenhanced image acquisition of the liver was performed during a single breath hold at 120 kVp. All unenhanced images were reconstructed using contiguous 5‐mm intervals.
The CT image analysis in this study consisted of liver attenuation measurement using a standard region of interest (ROI) technique. Care was taken to measure representative areas of the liver parenchyma, avoiding visible vessels, visible bile ducts, and focal lesions. For each patient, the average CT attenuation values in five sectors were monitored to evaluate hepatic fat content. In this study, we defined a CT value of <40 Hounsfield units (HU) as representing NAFLD (Figure 1A).12
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!