The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using ultim max 65

1

Microstructural Analysis of Porous Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microstructure and morphology were characterized by Mira 3 FEG SEM (Tescan, Brno, Czech Republic) equipped with in-beam secondary electron (SE), backscattered electrons (BSE), and an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) UltimMax 65 (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK) detector. The porosity level was examined by an GX51 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) optical microscope on polished samples, and the micrographs were analyzed using Stream Start and GIMP software through color histogram analysis. The grain size was measured by the Snyder–Graff method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Surface Analysis of C-steel Corrosion Mitigation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the surface analysis, C-steel specimens were immersed in 1.0 M HCl solution without and with the optimum concentration of PyODT at 298 K. After 1 h and 12 h of exposure, the metallic samples were carefully removed from the electrolyte, gently washed with distilled water, dried at room temperature, and characterized without any further treatment by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). SEM measurements were carried out using a JSM 5600 LV scanning electron microscope (JEOL, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan), operated at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. The elemental analysis of the corrosion products formed on the C-steel surface was performed by the energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) using an Oxford Instruments spectrometer (UltimMAx65 (High Wycombe, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multimodal Characterization of Synthesized Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns were recorded on a PANalytical PW3040/60 X’Pert PRO MPD (Malvern Panalytical B.V, Almelo, The Netherlands) X-ray diffractometer with Cu-Ka radiation (1.5418 Å). SEM images were obtained by a Zeiss Supra VP35 (Carl Zeiss SMT, Wetzlar, Germany) scanning electron microscope and an FEG-FIB Tescan Solaris with an EDX detector Ultim Max 65 (Oxford Instrument, Abingdon-on-Thames, UK). TEM images were obtained using an FEI Tecnai 12 operating under an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The surface area and pore size characteristics of the synthesized samples were analyzed by N2 adsorption and desorption measurements using an ASAP 2020 Micromeritics surface area and porosity analyzer (Norcross, GA, USA). Before the nitrogen adsorption/desorption measurements were performed, all samples were dried at 120 °C under vacuum for 12 h. Raman measurements were performed with a ThermoFisher DXR Raman microscope (Waltham, MA, USA) using a laser with an excitation wavelength of 780 nm (1 mW) and a 50× objective (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). XPS spectra were acquired using the Mg Kα line (hν = 1253.6 eV) and a pass energy of 20 eV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Functionalized Paper-Based AuNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The structures and surface morphologies of the functionalized
papers image were obtained using SEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Verios
5 UC) after platinum coating for 120 s. Additionally, energy-dispersive
spectroscopy and elemental mapping (EDS, Oxford Instruments, AztecLive,
and Ultim Max 65) were used in conjunction with SEM to determine the
major atoms (C, O, Si, and Au) and atomic percentage of Paper_AuNPs_CIN.
Moreover, ICP-OES was used to determine the wt % of Si and Au loading
(ICP-OES, Thermo Scientific, iCAP7400DUO). The surface atomic composition
was investigated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (Thermo
Scientific, NEXSA). To gain further insight into the chemical bonding
situation, the samples were analyzed using an FT-IR spectrometer equipped
with an attenuated total reflector (ATR) mode, in the range of 4000–400
cm–1 with a resolution of 4.0 and a scan rate of
32 scans. Additionally, the optical properties of the fabricated papers
were monitored between 200 and 800 nm by DRS (PerkinElmer, LAMBDA
950).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Titania Particle Clusters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An inverted fluorescence microscope (ECLIPSE, Ti-S, Nikon, Co., Ltd.) with an oil immersion objective (100×, Plan Flour, Nikon) was used. Movies of the sample were taken while moving the viewing field, and the number of clusters having various m values was counted. Approximately 1000 clusters were counted in the total for PS samples. For the titania sample, more than 50 clusters were counted because most of the particles formed large aggregates.
Large aggregates of titania samples were observed using a confocal laser scanning microscope (type C2, Nikon) and an all-in-one microscope (BZ-X800, KEYENCE, Osaka, Japan) equipped with an optical sectioning module (BZ-H4XF, KEYENCE, Osaka, Japan).
The particles’ surface structure and elemental analysis were performed using a transmission electron microscope (type S-4800, Hitachi, Tokyo) and a EDS/EDX detector (ULTIM MAX65, Oxford Instruments, Tokyo, Japan) at the Analysis Center, Nagoya City University.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Surface Analysis of Worn Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscope (SEM)—Tescan MIRA3 Brno, The Czech Republic—and optical microscope (OM)—Opta-Tech 40LAB, Warsaw, Poland—were used to investigate the surface conditions of the worn samples.
SEM investigations was conducted in contrast to the secondary electron (SE) and backscattered electrons (BSE). The BSE contrast is beneficial because it gives information about chemical composition diversity. The areas that contain light elements are dark, whereas heavy elements are bright. Additionally, sample surfaces were analyzed by the EDS method. The microanalyzer (Ultim® Max 65, Oxford Instruments, High Wycombe, UK) was used to detect the elements appearing on the surface of the sample. Calcium, fluorine, nickel, chromium, and oxygen were analyzed. The results of the EDS analysis were shown in one color-element concentration map and in twelve color-scale maps. In this investigation, the accelerating voltage equal to 12 kV was used because the interaction volume has to be limited.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Wear Surfaces in Sintered Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The worn surfaces of sintered materials and counter-specimens as well as wear products were observed after the tests using SEM (Mira 3, Tescan, the Czech Republic) equipped with EDS (Ultim Max 65, Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK). In order to limit the excitation zone, an accelerating voltage of 12 kV was used. Quantitative tests of chemical composition of the surface of sintered materials and wear products were carried out. The element concentrations were also distributed in the form of EDS maps by means of a color scale. In the color scale, the colors corresponded to the concentration of the selected element. The intensive color pixels indicated the highest concentration of the element, and the darker areas corresponded to the concentration near to zero. Numerical values on these maps correspond to the number of counts. The phase composition tests were carried out on sinter surfaces after the frictional tests using an X-ray diffractometer (Empyrean, PANalytical, the Netherlands) equipped with a copper lamp (X-ray wavelength λ = 1.54060 Å) and an X’Celerator detector. XRD patterns were recorded at room temperature, in the angular range 25–100° 2theta, in steps of 0.017° 2theta. The phase analysis of the obtained diffractograms was performed in the HighScore program equipped with the PDF-4 database.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Morphology and Elemental Analysis of Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the film surfaces was observed using SEM (Tescan Mira3, Tescan, Brno, Czech Republic) equipped with EDS (Oxford Instruments Ultim Max 65). An accelerating voltage of 12 kV was applied. Prior to SEM observation, the sheet surface of selected films was cleaned with methanol and dried for 220 min at 60 °C. All samples were sputtered coated with an amorphous layer of carbon with a thickness of approximately 20 nm. The Jeol JEE 4B vacuum evaporator (Peabody, MA, USA) was used. The contents of elements such as Mg were analyzed. Due to the low atomic number of carbon, its content was not measured. The distribution of element concentrations in the form of EDS patterns maps were performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Microstructure and Composition Analysis of Catalysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For EDX measurements, a cross-section of the monolith was polished with an ion cross-section polisher (JEOL, SM-09010) in order to obtain a plane surface. To increase the conductivity of the surface, gold was sputtered onto it. The microstructure and chemical composition of the catalyst were then analyzed by means of a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Zeiss, Gemini SEM300) equipped with an EDX-detector (UltimMax 65, Oxford instruments). The images were acquired at 20 kV with a scan time of 2 ms/pixel. The EDX data were then processed by AZtec software (V. 5.1, Oxford Instruments).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Analytical Characterization of CSS Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM investigation was performed on a Sigma VP (Zeiss, Germany) at low acceleration voltage (0.7 kV) and detected with an in-lens detector. The CSS was coated by sputter deposition with a 4.0 nm layer of a platinum/palladium alloy (80/20), while the AC—CSS were analyzed without coating.
The energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) signal was detected with an Ultim® Max 65 (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK) at 5.5 kV. The signal was further processed and evaluated in AZtecLive software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!