The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Atl lysis buffer

Manufactured by Qiagen
Sourced in Germany

The ATL lysis buffer is a reagent used in the process of cell lysis, which is a critical step in DNA and RNA extraction. It is designed to efficiently disrupt cell membranes and release the genetic material for further purification and analysis. The ATL lysis buffer is a key component in various nucleic acid extraction kits and protocols developed by Qiagen.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

30 protocols using atl lysis buffer

1

Genomic Characterization of C. burnetii Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A summary of the features of all the C. burnetii strains used in this study is indicated in Table 1. The strains from the Netherlands were primarily isolated from aborted placentas of goats, sheep and from heart valves of human chronic infected patients during the Q fever outbreak period (2007–2010; Roest et al., 2011a (link)). This study also involves strains isolated from aborted placentas of goats and cattle from France. Additionally, a few strains were isolated from Q fever infected humans from elsewhere in the world. All the strains were genotyped based on MLVA (Roest et al., 2011a (link)). The majority of the strains used for sequencing were cultured with a minimal number of sub-passages in BGM cells (Roest et al., 2012 (link)). A few strains were cultured axenically in acidified citrate cysteine medium (ACCM-2) also maintaining a minimum number of sub-passages to prevent phase variation (Table 1; Omsland et al., 2011 (link)). Genomic DNA was isolated using the phenol-chloroform method (Tang et al., 2013 (link)) after overnight incubation with ATL lysis buffer and proteinase K (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). A prior DNase treatment was performed to the bacterial pellet of cell-culture cultivated strains to eliminate most of the host derived DNA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Tissue Homogenization and DNA Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues (15-35mg) were homogenised in 600μl of ATL lysis buffer (Qiagen Hilden, Germany) supplemented with 40mM—dithiothreitol (VWR Pennsylvania, United States), using a Tissue Ruptor (Qiagen). The homogenised solution was centrifuged at 14 000g for 3 mins to remove any micro-tissue particulate from the solution. From the recovered lysate 180μl was taken for DNA purification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Saliva-Derived microRNA Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA from 1 mL of saliva was extracted using the QIAmp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (Qiagen, 55114) and Circulating microRNA protocol (QiaM). Proteinase-K digestion was carried out as instructed. Carrier RNA was not used. The ATL Lysis buffer (Qiagen, 19076) was used as indicated in the microRNA protocol. The final elution volume was 20 μL (Fig. 1A).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Muscle Tissue DNA Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Muscle samples were incubated overnight in 360 μL of buffer proprietary ATL lysis buffer and 40 μL proteinase (Qiagen) at 55°C in a thermomixer set at 300 r.p.m. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation and 200 μL of clear lysates was placed in the QIAsymphony SP workstation (Qiagen). DNA was extracted with the QIAsymphony DNA Mini kit (Qiagen, catalogue no. 937236) following the manufacturer’s procedures. Quantitative PCR was performed on the Fluidigm Biomark system following the Fluidigm Specific Target Amplification Quick Reference (Fluidigm). Samples were loaded as technical triplicates. The real-time PCR data were analysed using the Linear Derivative baseline correction and User (detector) Ct threshold method on the latest version of the Fluidigm Biomark software (v.4.1.3). Quantification of mtDNA was performed using two customized Taqman assays targeted against a nuDNA sequence (18S) and a conserved region of mtDNA (MTND1). Relative mtDNA copy number was determined comparing MTND1 to 18S signal. qPCR data quality control was performed and samples with low DNA sample concentration or low sample purity were discarded. These criteria were defined before starting the analysis of the raw data. Sample belonging to 4 subjects (2 placebo and 2 UA 1000 mg) did not meet the QC requirements and were excluded from the analysis
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genomic Analysis of Coxiella burnetii

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total DNA from high passage C. burnetii strains (n>30x times) propagated in cell-free culture was isolated by phenol-chloroform method [32 (link)] after overnight incubation with ATL lysis buffer and proteinase K (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Whole genome sequencing was performed using 250 bp paired-end sequencing libraries (Nextera TAG-mentation sequencing kits, Epicentre, Madison, USA) on an Illumina MiSeq sequencer. High quality paired end reads were mapped against the reference NM RSA493 genome available from the NCBI database (Accession number: AE016828.2) using Bowtie2 alignment tool [33 (link)]. The average coverage and standard deviation (excluding repetitive regions) were obtained for the whole genome using a sliding-window approach and were used to calculate the coverage of genes involved in LPS synthesis (CBU0676 to CBU0706). A coverage below the minus 2 SD interval was considered as a significantly deleted gene. Apart from genome analysis, the protein profiles of low and high passaged 602 strain were also analysed by SDS-PAGE using the whole cell lysates, as described previously [34 (link)]. The method was basically the same except for staining of proteins with SYPRO Orange dye (Molecular probes) and visualising the protein profiles with a Typhoon Trio imager and ImageQuant 5.2 software (Molecular Dynamics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DNA Extraction Methods Comparison

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNAs from samples were extracted by two different methods. First, a standardized silica-based DNA extraction kit (DNAeasy Blood & Tissue Kit, QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany) was used for the purification of total DNA, as instructed by the manufacturer. A total of 5 µL was used as a template in the RPA reaction. Second, the same clinical samples were incubated with 200 µL QIAGEN ATL lysis buffer at 70 °C for 20 min. Then, 1 µL of the processed sample was diluted in 9 µL nuclease-free water, and 1 µL of the mix was used as a template.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Optimized Cell-Free DNA Extraction and Library Prep

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasma (1 mL) was extracted using the QIAmp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (Qiagen) using the microRNA Plasma (QiaM) protocol. Proteinase-K digestion was carried out as instructed. Carrier RNA was not used. The ATL Lysis buffer (Qiagen) was used as indicated in the microRNA protocol. The final elution volume was 20 μL. Single-stranded DNA library preparation was performed using the SRSLY PicoPlus DNA NGS Library Preparation Base Kit with the SRSLY 12 UMI-UDI Primer Set, UMI Add-on Reagents, and purified with Clarefy Purification Beads (Claret Bioscience). Since there is currently no optimized method to measure uscfDNA, 18 μL of extracted cfDNA was used as input and heat-denatured. The low molecular weight retention protocol was followed for all bead-clean up steps. The index reaction PCR was run for 11 cycles. Library quantity and quality were evaluated using the Qubit dsDNA HS assay kit (ThermoFisher) and TapeStation HSDD1000 (Agilent) tape.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

SARS-CoV-2 RNA Extraction and Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to RNA extraction, 200 µL of VTM supplemented samples were inactivated by mixing with 200 µL of ATL Lysis buffer (Qiagen). RNA extractions were performed on 200 µL of inactivated samples and experiments were carried out using three different processes, according to their availability at University Hospital: (1) Extraction on the Alinity m system (Abbott) using the Alinity m Sample Prep Kit 2, Alinity m Lysis Solution, and Alinity m Diluent Solution (Abbott) followed by RT-qPCR on the Alinity m system using the proprietary Alinity m SARS-CoV-2 AMP Kit targeting RdRp and N genes; (2) Automatic extraction on a Starlet platform (Hamilton) using the Starmag 96 Universal kit (Seegene) followed by RT-qPCR targeting the RdRp, E and N viral genes on a CFX 96 (Biorad) using the Allplex 2019-nCov assay kit (Seegene); (3) Extraction on MGISP-NE32 (MGI) was carried out using the MGIEasy Nucleic Acid Extraction Kit (MGI) followed by RT-qPCR on a LightCycler480 (Roche) using either Real time fluorescent RT-PCR (RdRp probe) (BGI) or the RT-PCR Argene SARS-CoV2 R-gene kit (N and RdRp Probes) (BioMérieux).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

RNA Extraction from DBS Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA testing involved elution from the DBS by lysing a 6 mm spot for 2 h at 56°C with 20 µl of proteinase K and 300 µl of ATL lysis buffer (Qiagen products: 19133 and 19076). The entire eluate was extracted on the Qiagen Qiasymphony platform using the Qiasymphony DSP Virus/Pathogen mini kit (Qiagen product: 937036) and ‘cell‐free V6/7 DSP default IC’ protocol. Bacteriophage MS2 was added as the internal control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

DNA Methylation Profiling of FFPE Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA extraction and genome-wide DNA methylation profiling by Illumina 450K Infinium assay were performed as previously described (7 (link)). Briefy, microdissected FFPE tissue (paraffin block needle core or glass slide razor scrape) was lysed in a cocktail containing mineral oil (for deparaffmization), proteinase K, and ATL lysis buffer (Qiagen), and resultant lysates were filter-purified by Qiagen DNA enrichment columns. Purified DNAs were treated with FFPE DNA restoration solution (Illumina) and then analyzed with the standard protocol Illumina 450K methylation beadarray assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!