The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using alexa fluor 488 chicken anti rabbit igg h l

1

Multiparametric Immunofluorescence Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed in 4% Paraformaldehyde (PFA, Electron Microscopy Sciences) for 10 min at RT followed by 10 min of permeabilization using the following permeabilization buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 50 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 0.5 % Triton X-100). The following primary antibodies were incubated overnight: OCT3/4 (1:100, sc-5279, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), ZSCAN4 (1:2000, AB4340, Millipore Sigma), γH2AX (1:1000, 05-636, Millipore), CTCF (1:1000, ab188408, Abcam), Flag (1:500, F1804, Sigma Aldrich). Corresponding Alexa Fluor 488 Chicken anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# 31431), Alexa Fluor 488 Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-11001), Alexa Fluor 647 Chicken anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21443) or Alexa Fluor 647 Chicken anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-21463) secondary antibodies were used to reveal primary antibody binding (1:1000). For generating the plots shown in Extended Data 2b, image analysis was performed using a custom Python script. In brief, DAPI-stained nuclei were segmented using the StarDist deep-learning image segmentation52 . Segmented nuclei ROIs were used to quantify total DAPI intensity and RFP mean intensity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Imaging DNA Damage and Apoptosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EDM cultures on coverslips were collected and fixed with 4% formalin for 30 min. All steps were performed at room temperature. EDMs were then permeabilised with PBS 0.2X Triton for 30 min and treated with NH4Cl for 30 min to remove residual formalin. EDMs were incubated in PBS 1% BSA for 1 h, followed by overnight incubation at 4 °C with a rabbit anti-mouse cleaved caspase-3 (Asp175) antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), or a mix of mouse anti-vertebrate γH2AX (Ser139) (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France) and rabbit anti-mouse 53BP1 (Novus Biologicals, Abingdon, UK) or rhodamine Phalloidin (Fischer Scientific). EDMs were then incubated for 2 h with a mix of Alexa Fluor 680 goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) (Fischer Scientific) and Alexa Fluor 488 chicken anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) (Fischer Scientific) or with an Alexa Fluor Plus 680 Donkey anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA USA, #A32802). EDMs were mounted in Prolong gold antifade mounting medium with 4′,6-diamino-2-phénylindole (DAPI) (Fischer Scientific) and examined under a Leica SP8 confocal microscope. Number of 53BP1 and γH2AX foci and cleaved caspase-3 fluorescence intensity were quantified with the ImageJ/Fiji software (version 1.54f).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunofluorescence Staining of MCF10A Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MCF10A cells were fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 20 min, permeabilized in 0.15% Triton X‐100/PBS for 10 min and blocked in blocking solution (1% BSA, 0.05% Tween 20, PBS) for 30 min at room temperature. Primary antibodies diluted in blocking solution were added for 1 h at room temperature and detected by fluorochrome‐conjugated secondary antibodies. Nuclei were stained DAPI (Sigma–Aldrich). Primary antibodies used were anti‐ANGPTL4 (1:1000, rabbit monoclonal, Sigma–Aldrich), anti‐Fibronectin (1:1000, mouse monoclonal, Sigma‐Aldrich), anti‐FLAG M2 (1:250, mouse monoclonal, Sigma–Aldrich) and anti‐Rab8 (1:100, mouse monoclonal, Biolegend). Secondary antibodies used were Alexa Fluor 488 chicken anti‐mouse IgG (H+L) (1:400, Thermo Fisher Scientific), Alexa Fluor 488 chicken anti‐rabbit IgG (H+L) (1:400, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and Alexa Fluor 568 donkey anti‐mouse IgG (H+L) (1:400, Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Co-localization of eIF-5A and CDPK4 in Plasmodium

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For co-localization experiments, sporozoites, second-generation merozoites, and slides containing DF-1 cells infected with sporozoites for 2 h, 24 h were used. Cells were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized in TritonX-100, blocked in 5% skimmed milk in PBS, incubated with mouse anti-rEteIF-5A polyclonal antibody (1:100) and rabbit anti-rEtCDPK4 polyclonal antibody (1:100), then labeled with Alexa Fluor™ 647 chicken anti-mouse IgG (H+L) (1:200) and Alexa Fluor™ 488 chicken anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) (1:200 ratio dilution) (Invitrogen). A negative control of healthy rabbit IgG was used instead of the mouse anti-rEteIF-5A polyclonal antibody (1:100) and rabbit anti-rEtCDPK4 polyclonal antibody (1:100). After each step, slides were washed six times with PBS containing 0.5% (v/v) Tween-20. Nuclei staining and fluorescence quenching were performed as above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescence Staining of Endothelial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The adherent cells were rinsed with PBS and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature. The cells were incubated in normal goat serum (3 mg/ml; Jackson ImmunoResearch, USA) for 20 min and then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The cells were washed with PBS four times and then incubated with the corresponding secondary antibodies for 1.5 h. The primary antibodies included the purified rat anti-mouse CD31 (1:10, BD Biosciences, USA), vWF (1:100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA), Flk-1 (1:100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA), and VE-Cadherin (1:100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA). The second antibodies were Alexa Fluor 594 chicken anti-rat IgG (H&L) and Alexa Fluor 488 chicken anti-rabbit IgG (H&L) (1:200, Invitrogen, USA). Nuclei were counterstained with 1 μg/ml DAPI (Roche, USA). Fluorescent images were visualized at 200× magnification with a laser scanning confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!