The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using gelgreen nucleic acid stain

1

Validating Daphnia pulicaria Strain Identity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To validate that DNA samples were of the correct and single strain of origin, samples were PCR amplified for DP496, a microsatellite locus previously identified in Colbourne et al. (2004) and demonstrated to have discriminating allelic patterns between these two D. pulicaria strains (Wilson and Hay 2007 ; Chislock et al. 2019a ). Primer sequences were obtained from the Daphnia Genomics Consortium, wfleabase (http://wfleabase.org/genomics/microsatellite/) (Colbourne et al. 2004 , 2005 (link)). PCR reactions were carried out in 10 µl volumes using 5 µl of 2X GoTaq Green PCR Master Mix [Promega, USA], 0.3 µl of 10 µM forward and reverse primers (0.3 µM final concentration), 3.65 µl of water, and 0.75 µl of DNA (21 ng). The thermocycler program for the PCR began with a 2 min denaturation cycle at 95°C, followed by 35 cycles of 20 s at 95°C, 20 s at 50°C, and 20 s at 72°C, and a final extension cycle for 10 min at 72°C. DNA from a single individual of each strain was used as positive controls, and water instead of DNA was used as a no template control. Five microliters of PCR products were visualized on a 3% agarose gel made with 0.5X TAE and 1 µl of GelGreen Nucleic Acid Stain [Biotium, USA] to confirm that the allelic patterns for the genome samples were consistent with the positive controls for the target strains.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluation of Cell Cytotoxicity Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PAs (europine (CAS# 570-19-4; assay 100%), riddelliine (CAS# 23,246-96-0; assay ≥ 98%) and lasiocarpine (CAS# 303-34-4; assay 100%) were obtained from PhytoLab (Vestenbergsgreuth, Bayern, Germany); Cyclophosphamide (CAS# 6055–19-2; assay ≥ 97%) was from Alfa Aesar (Karlsruhe, Germany). Gel Green Nucleic Acid stain was obtained from Biotium (Darmstadt, Germany). Fluorescein diacetate (FDA; CAS# 596-09-8) was from Invitrogen (Germany). Dimethylsulfoximide (DMSO; ≥ 99.8%), bisBenzimide H33258 (CAS# 23,491–45-4; assay ≥ 98%), diazabicyclo-octane (DABCO), ketoconazole (CAS# 65,277-42-1; assay ≥ 98%), quinidine (CAS# 56-54-2; assay ≥ 97%), verapamil (CAS# 152-11-4; assay ≥ 99%), nelfinavir (CAS# 159,989-65-8; assay ≥ 98%), benzbromarone (CAS# 3562-84-3; assay ≥ 95%), vincristine (CAS# 2068-78-2; assay ≥ 97%), cytochalasin B (CAS# 14,930-96-2), ethidium bromide (CAS# 1239-45-8; assay ≥ 95%) and sodium fluorescein (CAS# 518-47-8; assay ≥ 95%) were from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Calcein-acetoxymethyl ester (Calcein-AM; CAS# 148,504-34-1; assay ≥ 95%) was from Cayman Chemical Company (Germany). Cell culture media and reagents were all from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany), except foetal bovine serum, which was from Biochrom (Berlin, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Neutral Comet Assay for DNA Damage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA double strand breaks were detected using neutral CometAssay Kit (Trivagen, MD, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, control and Mortaparib-treated cells were harvested and mixed with pre-warmed (37 °C) agarose, and layered immediately onto Cometslide™ (Trivagen). Slides were placed in dark at 4 °C for 1 h and immersed in lysis solution at 4 °C overnight. Excess of lysis solution was removed and slides were subjected to electrophoresis using Neutral Electrophoresis Buffer™ (Trivagen). The slides were then washed with 70% ethanol at room for 30 min temperature followed by drying at 37 °C for 10–15 min. GelGreen® nucleic acid stain (Biotium, CA, USA) was added onto slides and washed thrice with PBS. Comet formation was observed and recorded under Zeiss Axiovert 200 M microscope (Carl Zeiss Microimaging, Thornwood, NY).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Plasmid DNA Conformational Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pDNA was incubated for 3 h at RT with the following solvent mixtures: DCM, DCM + 0.01% sodium cholate, DCM + 0.3% sodium cholate, DCM + 0.6% sodium cholate, DCM + 1% sodium cholate, DCM + 1% PVA, DCM + 1% (41% Tween 80 + 59% Tween 20) and DCM + 1% Triton X-100, mimicking the conditions during the double emulsion procedure. Subsequent loading onto a 1% agarose gel in TBE buffer (8.9 mM Tris, 8.9 mM boric acid, 0.2 mM EDTA, pH 8.4) containing Gel Green nucleic acid stain (Biotium, Fremont, CA, USA) and electrophoresis resolved the different conformations present in each sample. Purified pDNA stock in DNAse-free Milli-Q water was used as the control, confirming the exclusive presence of the supercoiled functional conformation in the sample. Adequate separation of the bands for supercoiled, linear, and open circular plasmid DNA was obtained by running the electrophoresis gel for at least 40 min at 60 V. Images were acquired using a UV transilluminator (Vilber Lourmat, TCX-20C, Collégien, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fungal Strain Identification via ITS Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Growing mycelia of individual fungal strains were maintained in pure cultures for 7 days on PDA medium for genomic DNA extraction. Genomic DNA was extracted using a modified CTAB (hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide) method, described earlier [27 ]. The DNA extracts were stored at – 20 °C until used. Species identification was done on the basis of the sequences of the Internal Transcribed Spacers of the ribosomal DNA region (ITS1-ITS2).
Polymerase chain reactions were performed as described previously by Kozłowska et al. [9 ], using DreamTaq Green DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific, Espoo, Finland). The PCR amplification was done using ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) and ITS5 (5′-GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG-3′) primers. Amplicons were electrophoresed in 1.5% agarose gel (Invitrogen) with GelGreen Nucleic Acid Stain (Biotium, Inc.).
For sequence analysis, PCR-amplified DNA fragments were purified as described previosly by Kozłowska et al. [9 ], DNA fragments were labelled using a forward primer and the BigDyeTerminator 3.1 kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), according to the producer’s recommendations, and precipitated with 96% ethanol. Sequence reading was performed using Applied Biosystems equipment. Sequences were analysed using the BLASTn algorithm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fungal DNA Extraction and Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A modified method using CTAB (hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide) was applied for genomic DNA extraction, as described earlier58 (link). Species identification was performed on the basis of the sequence analysis of the Internal Transcribed Spacers of the ribosomal DNA region (ITS1-ITS2).
Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were performed as described earlier27 (link) using DreamTaq Green DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific, Espoo, Finland). For the PCR amplification specific primers were used: ITS4 – forward primer (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) and ITS5 – reverse primer (5′-GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG-3′)59 . Amplicons were separated in 1.5% agarose gel (Invitrogen) with GelGreen Nucleic Acid Stain (Biotium, Inc.).
For sequence analysis, PCR-amplified DNA fragments were purified as described earlier60 (link). DNA fragments were labelled using a forward primer and the BigDyeTerminator 3.1 kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), according to the producer’s recommendations and precipitated with 96% ethanol. Sequence reading was performed using Applied Biosystems equipment. Sequences were analysed using the BLASTn algorithm against the GenBank database-deposited reference sequences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolated and quantified RNA were used to synthesize cDNA using OneScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Applied Biological Materials Inc, Richmond, BC, Canada) for each sample. Bright Green Master mix qPCR kit (Applied Biological Materials Inc, Richmond, BC, Canada; Cat# MasterMix-S) protocol was followed using QuantStudio 3 qRT-PCR system as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The qRT-PCR products were loaded into a 2 % agarose gel with Gel green nucleic acid stain (Biotium), separated by electrophoresis and visualized licor D-Digit gel scanner. Following primer sequences were used to qRT-PCR analysis; For TNF-α, forward 5’-CTCCTCCTCCTGACCTTCTAATAAT-3’, reverse 5’-CTCCTCTGCCAAGTTCATATC C-3’; For α-Smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) forward 5’-GAGGCACCACTGAACCCTAA-3’, reverse 5’-CATCTCCAGAGTCC AGCACA-3’; For E-cadherin forward 5’-CACCTGGAGAGAGGCCATGT-3’, reverse 5’-TGGGAAACATG AGCAGCTCT-3’; For Fibronectin forward 5’-CGAGGTGACAGAGACCACAA-3’, reverse 5’-CTGGAGTCAAGCCAGACACA-3’; For Vimentin forward 5’-CTTGAACGGAAA GTGGAATCCT-3’, reverse 5’-GTCAGGCTTGGAAACGTCC-3’; for s16 forward 5’-GATGAAGTCGGAGCTGGTAAA-3’, reverse 5’-GGAGTGACAGGCAACTATGAA-3’. The fold changes in mRNA expression were calculated by normalization of cycle threshold [C(t)] value of target genes to reference gene s16 using the ΔΔCt method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Agarose Gel Electrophoresis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First, 1% gel agarose (Hydragene, #R9012LE) was dissolved in TAEX1 (dissolved with DDW from TAEX50 (Biolab, #2050237500)) and then carefully heated in a microwave. When the solution was completely clear, 8 μL of GelGreen nucleic acid stain (Biotium, #41005) was added. The solution was poured into a mold and the gel comb was immediately inserted. The gel was cooled to room temperature for 20 min and then gently placed in the TBEX1 buffer-filled box. All samples were loaded in their wells including DNA markers, and an electrical current was applied via the power supply to the rear. After about 30 min, the gel was removed for imaging under ultraviolet light.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

LAMP Amplification Detection Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LAMP amplification results were detected with three different methods in a laboratory setting: 1. on 1% TBE agarose gel stained with GelGreen® Nucleic Acid Stain (Biotium, Fremont, CA) for visual observation; 2. with SYBR Green 1 nucleic acid gel stain (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for observation under UV light; and 3. using Genie® III (OptiGene, Horsham, WS, UK) instrument by obtaining the amplification curves and analyzing data using Genie Explorer software (OptiGene, Horsham, WS, UK). All reactions were repeated at least three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

In Vitro Cre Recombination Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two direct loxP repeats or other variants of loxP/M7 sites separated by a ∼0.5 kb spacer were cloned between the XbaI and SphI sites of the pBAD33 plasmid. The 0.7 kb DNA substrate for in vitro recombination assays was generated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification with pBAD-forward and pBAD-reverse primers. One microgram of the DNA substrate was incubated with 1 μM Cre in 10 μl of 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.8, 50 mM NaCl and 10 mM MgCl2 for 12 h at 37°C. The total amount of protein used is the same across all in vitro assays. Reactions were stopped by incubation at 98°C for 20 min. Reactions were analyzed on 2% agarose gels and visualized by staining with GelGreen nucleic acid stain (Biotium).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!