The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

50 protocols using u 5100

1

Quantifying Antioxidant Activity and Polyphenol Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The scavenging activity of DPPH stable free radicals in analyzed extracts as well as acceptor fluids was assessed as previously described [72 (link)]. Briefly, 150 μL of the tested samples was mixed with 2850 μL of 0.3 mM DPPH solution (in 96% (v/v) ethanol). The DPPH working solution was diluted with 70% (v/v) ethanol until its absorbance at 517 nm was 1.00 ± 0.02. The incubation time of the samples in the dark was 10 min. Analyses at a wavelength of 517 nm were performed with a UV–Vis Spectrophotometer (Hitachi U-5100, Tokyo, Japan). Antioxidant activity determined by the DPPH method was expressed as % of DPPH radical scavenging, which was calculated from the formula: %DPPHscavenging=AcAsAc×100
where
The total polyphenol content (TPC) in analyzed extracts as well as acceptor fluids was determined using Folin–Ciocalteu method, according to the methodology described earlier [11 (link)]. Briefly, 150 μL of the tested sample, 150 μL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (diluted tenfold with water.), 1350 μL of 0.01 M sodium carbonate solution, and 1350 μL of distilled water were mixed and subjected to a 15 min incubation at room temperature. Absorbance measurements were made at a wavelength of 765 nm (UV–Vis Spectrophotometer Hitachi U-5100, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The results were expressed as gallic acid (GA) equivalents in µg·mL−1. Three independent measurements were made.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Solubility and Formulation of Resveratrol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The solubility of RES in different types of oils and emulsifiers were determined. An excess of RES powder was added into each vehicle followed by vortex mixing for 30 s. Then, the mixture was shaken at 37 °C in a water bath for 48 h and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min (Mikro 22R, Hettich Zentrifugen, Tuttlingen, Germany) to separate the undissolved RES. The clear supernatant was diluted with appropriate 50% (v/v) methanol and measured spectrophotometrically at 310 nm (U-5100, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The calibration cure of RES solution, constructed by UV-visible spectrophotometer (U-5100, Hitachi) at 310 nm, was in the range of 1–25 µg/mL.
The RES-SNEDDS preparation procedures were modified from a previous report [49 (link)]. Briefly, in the dark environment, RES (120 mg) was dissolved in 12 grams of oil phase (Capryol 90) by magnetic stirring to completely dissolve. The mixture of surfactant (Cremophor EL) and co-surfactant (Tween 20) were added in dropwise to prepare of a total weight of 20 grams and the resulting mixture was stirred for 30 min. Different ratios of oil phase, surfactants were prepared and examined to fine an optimal RES-SNEDDS. The formulation components of RES-SNEDDS were listed in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating Growth and Nutrient Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Growth parameters were measured for all plantlets, including height, root collar diameter, and above- and belowground biomass. The dry weights of the shoots and roots were recorded after oven-drying at 70 °C until they reached a constant mass. The foliar nutrient concentration was determined on dried material in the tested plantlets. Dried leaves were milled and passed through a 0.25 mm sieve, and a sample of 0.5 g of leaf powder was taken for digestion with H2SO4 and H2O2 (v/v) 1:4. Nitrogen, P and K contents were determined by the Kjeldahl Method (Foss Kjeltec 8400; Foss Analytics, Hillerød, Hovedstaden, Denmark), ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometry (Hitachi U-5100; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) and atomic absorption spectrophotometry (Hitachi Polarized Zeeman Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer ZA3000; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), respectively. In addition, the ratio of root:shoot growth was calculated to reflect the robustness of the plantlets and the efficiency of AMF inoculation (Tobar, Azcón & Barea, 1994 (link)). Six replicates were performed for each treatment and control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Nutrient Analysis of Water Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We measured phosphate (PO4-P), nitrate (NO3-N), total phosphorus (TP), total nitrogen (TN), dissolved organic matter (DOM), and total organic matter (TOM) from the filtrate, according to the methods of Saijo & Mitamura (1995) , using a spectrophotometer (HITACHI U-5100, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The absorbance of DOM was read at 254 nm, using samples not in an autoclave.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Dehydrogenase Activity Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dehydrogenase activity (DhA) was carried out according to the Thalmann method (1968)59 , using triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) as the electron acceptor. After incubation at 37 ± 2 °C for 24 h with TTC, samples were filtrated to separate the solution from soil and measured at 546 nm wavelength using a UV–VIS spectrophotometer (HITACHI U-5100, Hitachi High-Tech Science Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The results are given as mean values from four analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

UV-Vis Extinction Spectra Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The UV-Vis extinction spectra of all samples were measured at room temperature by the Hitachi U-5100 spectrophotometer (Hitachi Science & Technology, Tokyo, Japan) using a quartz cuvette (1.0 cm × 1.0 cm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Metals Analysis in Soil Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metals, including cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), (chrome) Cr, (iron) Fe, manganese (Mn), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn), were analyzed using an atomic absorption spectrometer (PERKIN–ELMER 3100, Shelton, CT, USA) with an air-acetylene flame. The concentrations of Al and Hg were established by the spectrophotometric method (HITACHI U-5100, Tokyo, Japan) using chrome azurol S and dithizone, respectively, as described by [80 ]. The soil samples were air-dried at an ambient temperature for three weeks, then the samples were ground to a grain diameter of ϕ ≤ 0.25 mm. The weight of a single sample was 10.00 g and during extraction, a universal shaker (time 1 h, speed 120, and amplitude 8) was used. Initially, 50 mL 0.5 mol L−1 of MgCl2 solution (pH 7) was added to the soil samples. The soils were then leached. Acetate buffer CH3COOH/CH3COONa, pH 5, was added to the soil residue and the leaching of the soil was continued. Blank extractions were prepared for each sample. Extractions and measurements were carried out in triplicate. Standard AAS (Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy) solutions (1000 mgL−1) from Sigma-Aldrich (Poznań, Poland) were used for the analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Measuring Nutrient and Biomolecule Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The concentrations of NO2 and NO3 ions in the supernatant of the tank solution collected from the AO-, MA-, and A-tanks were measured by ion chromatography (Dionex ICS-1000). The identification of NO2 and NO3 peaks was conducted using external standard methods. The concentration of NH4+ was measured by the indophenol blue method (Sagi, 1966 ). The concentrations of dissolved saccharides and proteins were measured by the phenol-sulfuric acid method (Kochert, 1978 ) and Bradford method (Bradford, 1976 (link)), respectively. Light absorbance was measured using a spectrophotometer (U-5100; HITACHI). Each measurement was conducted in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antioxidant Analysis of Canned Meat

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the analysis of antioxidant properties, samples were prepared as described by Jung et al. [66 (link)] with some modifications. Briefly, 10 mL of ethanol was mixed with 5 g of minced canned meat and homogenized (1000 rpm). Then, the samples were centrifuged (10,000 rpm for 20 min) and filtered. Absorbance was measured using a UV–VIS spectrophotometer (HITACHI U-5100).
Free radical scavenging activity was determined as described by Jung et al. [66 (link)] with some modifications. In the ABTS•+ method, 12 μL of supernatant was added to 1.8 mL of diluted ABTS•+ solution. Absorbance was measured at 734 nm after 3 min. In the DPPH method, absorbance was measured after 3 min at 517 nm using a diluted DPPH solution with an absorbance of 0.9 ± 0.02. In both these methods, the antioxidant capacity of the samples was calculated from a standard curve (concentration: 0.025–0 mg/mL for DPPH; 15–0 mg/mL for ABTS) and expressed as mg Trolox equivalent/mL.
FRAP (ferric ion-reducing antioxidant power) of the samples was measured at 700 nm as described by Oyaizu [67 (link)]. The results were expressed as absorbance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Color and Nitrosohemochrome Analysis of Canned Meat

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The color of the canned meat samples was measured using an X-Rite Color 8200 spectrophotometer (X-Rite Inc., Grand Rapids, MI, USA; port size: 13 mm; standard observer: 10°; illuminant: D65). The samples were cut into cuboids and analyzed at three points [64 (link)]. For the determination of nitrosohemochrome, 5 g of samples were homogenized for 1 min in acid acetone. After 30 min of storage in the dark, the samples were centrifuged (4000 rpm for 10 min), and the absorbance was measured (540 nm) using a UV–VIS spectrophotometer (HITACHI U-5100). The results were obtained by multiplying absorbance by 290 and expressed as mg/kg [65 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!