The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mmessage mmachine

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The MMessage mMachine is a laboratory instrument designed for the processing and analysis of molecular samples. It performs tasks such as nucleic acid purification, amplification, and detection. The core function of this product is to facilitate various molecular biology techniques, enabling researchers to study and manipulate genetic materials. The detailed specifications and capabilities of this equipment may vary, so for more information, please consult the product documentation or contact our sales team.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

105 protocols using mmessage mmachine

1

Microinjection of RNA and Morpholinos in Zebrafish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Capped sense mRNAs were synthesized using the mMESSAGE mMACHINE (Thermo Fisher Scientific). One nanoliter of RNAs and/or morpholinos (Gene Tools, OR) were injected into the yolk of one-cell-stage embryos unless stated otherwise. In the experiments, the following RNAs were used: egfp-f’-nos3′UTR (30 ng/μl) (60 (link)), ezrin-ypet-nos3′UTR (30 ng/μl) (55 ), lifeact-mCherry-nos3′UTR (20 ng/μl) (55 ), mCherry-h2b-globin3′UTR (100 ng/μl) (33 (link)), and h2a-tagBFP-SV40polyA (100 ng/μl) (35 (link)). morpholinos used were as follows: 800 μM MO-cxcr4a (AGACGATGTGTTCGTAATAAGCCAT, ZFIN-ID ZDB-MRPHLNO-070427-1), 100 μM MO-noto (GGGAATCTGCATGGCGTCTGTTTAG, ZFIN-ID ZDB-MRPHLNO-100514-1), and 350 μM MO-tbx16 (CTCTGATAGCCTGCATTATTTAGCC, ZFIN-ID ZDB-MRPHLNO-141217-1) and MO-control (CCTCTTACCTCAGTTACAATTTATA) at an 800, 100, and 350 μM concentration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Xenopus laevis Embryo Microinjection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Xenopus laevis embryos were obtained, fertilized and microinjected as described [20 (link)–26 ]. Xenopus laevis procedures were conducted to minimize animal discomfort as approved by the UT MDACC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (ACUF Protocol # 09-93-05717) and UTHealth’s Animal Welfare Committee (Protocol # AWC-19-0081). Embryos were microinjected at the 1–2-cell stage with capped mRNAs synthesized in vitro (mMessage mMachine, ThermoFisher Scientific), and then harvested at the indicated embryonic stages (between 9–12) for immuno-blotting [27 ]. All pCS2-based constructs were linearized using NotI prior to in vitro transcription. The single pSP64 construct was linearized with EcoR1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Genome Editing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genome editing was performed as previously described (Hwang et al., 2013 (link); Jao et al., 2013 (link)). We used linearized plasmid pCS2-nCas9n (Addgene plasmid #47929) (Jao et al., 2013 (link)) as a template for Cas9 mRNA synthesis (mMessage mMachine; Thermo Fisher Scientific). The guide RNA (gRNA) template was made by PCR and RNA was synthesized using a MEGAshortscript T7 kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). In all cases, 30-40 pg gRNA was co-injected with 150 pg Cas9 mRNA per embryo at one-cell stage. Indels were identified by loss of restriction enzyme sites. The G0 founders positive for mutation were outcrossed with wild-type fish to produce F1 heterozygotes, which were then analyzed using sequencing to identify the mutations. Individuals carrying desirable, identified mutations were outcrossed with wild type to generate an F2 heterozygous family.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

EGFP-3x Myc Protein Translation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EGFP-3x Myc cDNA mRNA was in vitro transcribed from its cDNA cloned into pSP64 poly(A) using mMESSAGE mMACHINE (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA). The mRNA was translated in the rabbit reticulocyte lysate system (Promega, Madison, WI) with or without 1 μM (final) MBP or MBP-TRAL proteins. Synthesized EGFP-3x Myc protein and MBP or MBP-TRAL proteins from the reaction were examined by immunoblot with anti-Myc (9E10; Covance, Princeton, NJ) or Anti-MBP antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Validating Specificity of Morpholinos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The specificity of MOs was validated by mRNA-mediated rescue of respective phenotypes. Rescue experiments were done by co-injection of capped mRNA (mMESSAGE mMACHINE; ThermoFisher Scientific) and MOs. Transcripts used were pkd2 (ENSDART00000020412) and slc25a25b (ENSDART00000098163).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Kv Channel Expression in Xenopus Oocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All human Kv3.2, Kv3.4a, and rat Kv1.2, Kv2.1, Kv3.1, Kv4.2, as well as Drosophila K-Shaw-F335A cDNAs encoding the investigated Kv channels were maintained in appropriate expression vectors suitable for in vitro transcription66 (link). Site-directed mutagenesis was conducted according to the QuickChange protocol (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). All chimeras were created by Phusion-based PCR (Thermofisher Scientific), and the primers used are listed in Supplementary Materials, Table S367 (link). All mutations were verified by automated DNA sequencing (Genewiz, South Plainfield, NJ). The mRNAs were synthesized with an in vitro RNA transcription kit (mMESSAGE mMACHINE by Ambion, ThermoFisher Scientific) followed by purification before heterologous expression in Xenopus oocytes66 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

In vitro Transcription Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Templates for in vitro transcription were amplified by PCR using either Phusion polymerase (NEB) or Pfx (Thermo) with primers M13 forward (5′-GTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3′) and reverse primers to either exclude or include the TYMV 3′-UTR and the various plasmids described above. The reverse primers used when the TYMV 3′-UTR was included were modified to ensure precise 3′ ends (CC and CCA). Specifically, the two penultimate DNA nucleotides were modified with 2′OMe50 (link) to reduce N + 1 T7 polymerase nucleotide addition. Methylated reverse primers were ordered from GE Dharmacon and IDT. PCR reactions of volume 200–500 µL were conducted, the DNA was purified using the Promega Wizard Kit, and ~1 µg of template was used in T7 in vitro transcription kits mMessage mMachine and MEGAscript (Thermo). RNAs were then purified using the Qiagen RNeasy kit and the concentration was determined using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo) at absorbance 260 nm. The quality of the RNA was determined by 8% denaturing PAGE and imaged using ethidium bromide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Foxc1 Gene Expression during Embryogenesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Capped mRNA was generated from a linear DNA template in a pCS2+ vector using the mMessage mMachine (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) kit, purified using TRIzol™ (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and microinjected into the one-cell stage embryo at doses of 5, 15, and 75 pg. The highest 75 pg dose was used for all subsequent experiments unless otherwise stated. All RNA technical replicates were performed on a single day, injecting foxc1 transcripts and control RNA at the same dose into the same clutch of embryos. Morpholino oligonucleotides foxc1a—CCTGCATGACTGCTCTCCAAAACGG—and foxc1b—GCATCGTACCCCTTTCTTCGGTACA—were previously reported [46 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Synthesis and Expression of NMDAR Subunits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
cDNAs for rat wild type NMDAR subunits GluN1-1a (GenBank U11418, U08261; hereafter GluN1 or GluN1a), GluN1-1b (U08263, hereafter GluN1b), GluN2A (D13211), GluN2B (U11419), GluN2C (M91563), and GluN2D (L31611, modified as described in Monyer et al., 1994 (link)) were provided by Drs. S. Heinemann (Salk Institute), S. Nakanishi (Kyoto University), and P. Seeburg (University of Heidelberg). Site-directed mutagenesis was conducted using the QuikChange kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) following the recommended protocol. DNA sequencing was used to verify all mutations. The amino acid numbering system started with the initiating methionine as residue number one. For expression in Xenopus laevis oocytes, cDNA constructs were linearized by restriction enzymes, and subsequently used to synthesize in vitro cRNAs following the manufacturer’s protocol (mMessage mMachine, Ambion, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Visualizing H3K27ac and miRNA during Zebrafish Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
pcDNA3-BD2-sfGFP-NLS-polyA was linearized with XhoI and treated with proteinase K. After purification of the linearized template by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation, in vitro transcription was performed using mMESSAGE mMACHINE (Thermo Fisher Scientific). RNA was purified by LiCl precipitation and re-suspended in H2O.
Before microinjection, zebrafish eggs were dechorionated manually using tweezers. A mixture (∼0.5 nl in PBS) of BD2-sfGFP-NLS mRNA (375 pg) and Cy5-labeled miR430-MO (0.8 pg) was injected into the yolk of 1-cell-stage embryos. Five minutes after mRNA injection, Cy3-labeled Fab specific to H3K27ac was injected (100 pg in ∼0.5 nl). Injected embryos were incubated at 28°C until the 4-cell stage and embedded in 0.5% low-gelling temperature agarose in 0.03% sea salt with animal pole down on a 35-mm glass-bottom dish. Fluorescence images were collected as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!