The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Electronic data capture tool

Manufactured by REDCap
Sourced in United States

REDCap is a secure web application for building and managing online surveys and databases. It is designed to capture and store data for research studies and clinical trials. REDCap provides a user-friendly interface for data entry, data manipulation, and data exports. The application is highly customizable and offers features such as real-time data validation, branching logic, and advanced data reporting.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

28 protocols using electronic data capture tool

1

COVID-19 ECMOCARD: Global ICU Cohort Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The COVID-19-CCC/ECMOCARD is an international, multicentre, cohort observational study ongoing in 351 hospitals across 53 countries. The full study protocol is available elsewhere [15 ]. To summarize, participating hospitals obtained local ethics committee approval and a waiver of informed consent was granted in all cases. ISARIC/SPRINT-SARI data collection began at admission to hospital, while data collection for the COVID-19–CCC observational study commenced at admission to the ICU. De-identified patient data were collected retrospectively and stored via the REDCap electronic data capture tool, hosted at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom or Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Digital Data Capture and Privacy for Clinical Trials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Study data will be recorded digitally using the secured REDCap electronic data capture tool (REDCap, Nashville, USA)106 (link) hosted at the UMCG. Data and biological materials will be stored for 15 years. Data analysis will take place with validated and pseudoanonymised data. To protect participant privacy, public access to the dataset will not be provided. After the last visit of the last participant and before disclosure of treatment arm allocation, data will be extracted from REDCap and exported to SPSS for analysis. No interim analyses will be performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Feasibility of Recovery-Oriented Assessment Scale

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The survey instrument was developed for this study and pilot-tested with two RAS-DS users from Australia and Canada. It collected information on: a) participants’ demographics and practice context, b) current or previous use of RAS-DS; and c) feasibility aspects of RAS-DS using items developed from the updated feasibility framework (Table 1). No items were included around RAS-DS being low cost, multidimensional and able to be aggregated given that these are objective features of RAS-DS (which is cost-free, is arranged around four domains and has demonstrated measurement properties that support aggregation) (31 (link)).
Throughout the survey, participants were given the option to explain or comment on their responses, and they provided free-text responses to questions about most and least useful aspects of RAS-DS. Current RAS-DS users were also asked further questions regarding their RAS-DS use (e.g., why and how RAS-DS was used, frequency of use and whether RAS-DS helped them be more recovery-oriented in their practice).
Study data were collected and managed using the REDCap electronic data capture tool hosted at The University of Sydney (38 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) is an ongoing UK birth cohort designed to further knowledge of determinants of illness and health.27 (link),28 (link) All pregnant women in the catchment area with a due date between April 1, 1991 and December 31, 1992 were eligible for invitation at antenatal appointments and through advertisements, and 14 541 were originally recruited.27 (link),28 (link) Their children were followed into adulthood. At age 7, 913 additional children were enrolled. In total, 14 901 infants surviving to age 1 were included.29 The ALSPAC Law and Ethics Committee and Local Research Ethics Committees provided ethical approval for the study and participants gave written informed consent. Study data were collected and managed using the REDCap electronic data capture tool hosted at the University of Bristol: a secure, web-based software platform.30 (link)Further details of the cohort profile and a fully searchable data dictionary can be obtained through the study website (https://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Ethical and Secure Research Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study was conducted in HealthPartners, a nonprofit health care system in Minnesota, and was approved by HealthPartners Institute Institutional Review Board. The procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation. Informed verbal consent was obtained from all adult participants for their own and their child’s participation, and informed verbal assent was obtained from all participants under the age of 18, which covered all study-related activities.
Recruitment and consent data were collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at HealthPartners Institute. REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) is a secure, web-based software platform designed to support data capture [17 (link)]. For this project, it provided an intuitive interface for validated data capture across multiple roles and users.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

CIED-Associated Non-SA GPC Bacteremia Epidemiology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A retrospective cohort study included all adult patients (18 years of age or older) with CIED who developed first episode of non-SA GPC bacteremia from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2019, at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. Exclusion criteria included: (1) patients with a left ventricular assist device, (2) patients who developed polymicrobial bacteremia, and (3) patients who declined Minnesota research authorization to use their medical record for research purposes. Cardiovascular Devices Database and Mayo Data Explorer software were used to identify the cases. Mayo Data Explorer retrieves data from multiple Mayo Clinic clinical databases that contain over 30 years of electronic medical record systems including microbiology data. Clinical variables including demographics, hospitalization, microbiology, treatment, and outcomes were manually abstracted from electronic medical records. All data were collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools15 (link),16 (link) hosted at the Mayo Clinic. The research in this study was conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration guidelines. The study was reviewed by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board and granted an exemption due to the use of de-identified and retrospective data (number 20-009376). The written informed consent was also waived due to the same reasons.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Standardized Outbreak Investigation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention standardized, validated healthcare-associated infection outbreak investigation form and toolkit (33 , 34 ) were adapted to analyze date and location data to identify possible transmission events in the healthcare setting of subjects determined to fall within a cluster based on WGS and phylogenetic analysis. Demographic, patient location, and microbiological data were collected from the EHR, then assembled and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at National Jewish Health.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Dietary Assessment in Pregnant South Africans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Habitual dietary intake was assessed at the second pregnancy visit (14-18 weeks) using an interviewer-administered quantitative food-frequency questionnaire (QFFQ). This nationally utilised QFFQ was developed by the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) based on analyses of 11 dietary surveys conducted in rural and urban South Africa and includes all foods consumed by at least 3% of the population (21 ). Retrospective data was collected on the frequency and quantity of food and beverage intake during the previous week using food flash cards (high quality photographs of food items) and a combination of household measures, two-dimensional life-size drawings of foods and utensils, and three-dimensional food models as described and validated by Steyn et al (22 (link)). According to the criteria developed by Dennis et al, this QFFQ is a very high quality tool – scoring a total of 13 points (high quality classified as a score of seven or higher) (23 (link)). This QFFQ has been extensively piloted and utilised in this setting and results are published elsewhere (10 ,24 (link),25 (link)). QFFQ data was captured electronically using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at The University of the Witwatersrand (26 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Data Collection and Analysis Protocol for Parasitic Disease Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data will be collected using electronic tablets, with REDCap electronic data capture tools [32 (link)] hosted at UNSW Sydney. Data will be collected offline and sent to the secure REDCap server daily using a secure wireless connection. Results of the qPCR analysis will be entered into a customised database and sent securely to UNSW Sydney. Regular data management meetings will be held to examine data quality and completeness, and review any queries. Trial data will be accessible only by a limited number of study investigators. De-identified data will also be provided to the Center for Parasitic Disease Control & Prevention in Dak Lak province.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Remote Research Participation during COVID-19

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All baseline study visits were conducted in-person at Helfgott Research Institute at NUNM in Portland, Oregon. Baseline visits included a review of participant eligibility, a discussion and signing of the informed consent, completion of self-report questionnaires, and surface electromyography testing (to be reported elsewhere). Baseline study visits lasted between 30 and 75 minutes, depending on participant questions and timeliness in survey completion. Follow-up visits contained, at most, the self-report questionnaires and surface electromyography testing; because of the nature of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic at the time of study implementation, participants were offered the opportunity to complete follow-up visits virtually, with self-report questionnaires delivered remotely through Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). Study data were collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at NUNM.31 (link),32 (link),47 REDCap is a secure, web-based software platform designed to support data capture for research studies, providing (1) an intuitive interface for validated data capture; (2) audit trails for tracking data manipulation and export procedures; (3) automated export procedures for seamless data downloads to common statistical packages; and (4) procedures for data integration and interoperability with external sources.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!