The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Autopore 4

Manufactured by Micromeritics
Sourced in United States

The Autopore IV is a mercury intrusion porosimeter that measures the pore size distribution and total pore volume of solid materials. It automatically measures the volume of mercury intruded into a sample as a function of pressure, providing information about the sample's pore structure.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using autopore 4

1

Characterization of Porous Coating Layers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The
images of the surface structure were obtained by a field-emission
scanning electron microscope (AURIGA, Carl Zeiss). The pore structure
of the coating layer was investigated using a focused ion beam microscope
(AURIGA, Carl Zeiss) and a mercury porosimeter (AutoPore IV, Micromeritics
Instrument Corp., USA). The coating color was applied to a 100 μm
thick polyethylene terephthalate film using a four-sided gap applicator
and dried at room temperature.
The porosity of the coating layer
was also measured using a mercury porosimeter and by the silicon oil
saturation method. In mercury porosimetry, the porosity was calculated
by the intrusion volume per coating layer volume (eq 6). The diameters of the pores ranged
from 10 to 100 nm, and they were assumed to have a cylindrical shape.
When the porosity was checked with silicon oil, the same film used
in the mercury porosimeter measurement was used as a coating substrate,
but a bar coater was used to apply the coating.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Porous Foam Structure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The foam was cut into small pieces and a MIRA3 field-emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, TESCAN, Czech) with an accelerating voltage of 5.0 kV was operated to investigate the microstructure of the foam after being sputter-coated with gold powder. The pore size distribution of the foam was measured by mercury porosimetry (Autopore IV, Micromeritics, USA). A commercial XG-CAM7.1 optical system was used to measure the contact angle (CA) of the foam through the sessile drop method. The droplet volume in the experiment was about 6–8 μL, and at least three different points on the same sample surface were tested for contact angle measurements (XG-CAMB3) to receive an average value.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Porous Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The specific surface area (SSA) was determined by nitrogen sorption using the Brunauer- Emmett-Teller method (ASAP 2020, Micromeritics, USA). Prior to the measurements, the samples were outgassed at 10 mmHg at a holding temperature of 100 °C for 2 h in vacuum conditions.
Mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP, AutoPore IV, Micromeritics, USA) was carried out to characterize the open porosity and pore entrance size distribution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of POSS-PCUU Porosity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were dehydrated and critical point dried as outlined earlier. POSS-PCUU porosity and pore size distribution were measured by adding the sample to a glass penetrometer (3 mL bulb volume; 1.1 mL stem volume), evacuating air from the penetrometer and sample, then intruding mercury under controlled pressure. A pressure range of 3 kPa–207 MPa was employed (AutoPore IV, Micromeritics, UK). The Washburn equation was used to determine the pore size distribution for each sample. The bulk density of the sample was estimated using the volume excluded within the penetrometer at the lowest intrusion pressure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Scaffold Porosity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Textural properties of the scaffolds (total pore volume (Vp), pore size distribution, and open porosity (εMIP)) before and after storage were measured through mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) with an Autopore IV equipment (9500 model, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA). MIP was operated with a 3 mL penetrometer for solids and at working pressures ranging from 0.07 to 1724 bar. Porosity and mean pore size (MIP—mean pore size) were determined using the Washburn equation from the variation of the intruded volume of mercury (Vp,MIP) in the scaffolds with the increase of pressure [73 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Porosity Analysis of Lunaria Septa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To measure the porosity of the Lunaria septa, mercury porosimetry was performed using an AutoPore IV porosimeter (Micromeritics, GA) with a pressure range of 0 to 33,000 psi. From the raw data of intruded volume versus pressure, differential intrusion as a function of pore size was calculated using the Washburn equation (assuming contact angle θ = 130° and surface tension γ = 0.485 N/m). To ensure enough material in the penetrometer, three septa were used for each porosity measurement. In total, four measurements were performed for statistical reliability and repeatability of the porosity measurement.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Pore Characterization of Plug Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pore characteristics of the plugs were analyzed using a Micromeritics AutoPore IV mercury porosimeter, which measured the pore size distribution, porosity, permeability, and grain density. The analysis was carried out on small subvolumes of the plug measuring 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm x 0.3 cm (see Fig. 1B), and pore pressure ranges from 0.5 to 40,000 psi were used. The Washburn equation was employed to calculate the pore size distribution, assuming cylindrical pores. The equation converted the imposed pressure p into the corresponding pore radius r , using parameters such as the mercury contact angle θ (130°) and surface tension γ (485 mNm-1) (Equation 2) [42 ]. p=2γcoscosθr
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Ceramic Hollow Fiber Membranes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface and cross-sectional morphology of the fabricated ceramic hollow fibre membranes (KHFMs) were measured using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) (TM 3000, Hitachi). The contact angle of the ceramic hollow fibre membrane was measured at the surface before and after hydrophobization by the sessile drop technique using a goniometer (Model: OCA 15EC, Dataphysics). Mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP, AutoPore IV, Micromeritics, USA) was used to measure the porosity and pore size distribution of the KHFMs prepared at different sintering temperatures and addition of pore agents. The KHFMs were broken into pieces and transferred to the 5 cm3 penetrometer sample holder (Micrometeritics, USA) which was then pressurized from 38.6 to 4.2 × 106 mbar for mercury intrusion.31 In this study, liquid entry pressure (LEPw) was used to measure the wettability properties of the grafted ceramic hollow fibre membranes. Distilled water flowed into the lumen side of the hollow fibre membranes using a diaphragm pump. The pressure was slowly increased, at 0.5 bar intervals, and the pressure at which the first water droplets appeared on the shell side surface of the hollow fibre was recorded as the LEPw.13,14 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Pore Structure Analysis of Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Porosimetry of the scaffolds was accomplished by means of mercury intrusion porosimetry using an Autopore IV mercury intrusion porosimeter (Micromeritics). The microsphere size used was 300–355 µm. Intrusion pressure and resulting volume change was recorded and converted to porosity and pore diameter distribution. After completion of testing, all toxic waste was disposed of properly according to institutional protocols.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterizing Alumina Supports via MIP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To account for the possible
presence of macropores, the alumina supports were further characterized
by mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) on an AutoPore IV instrument
(Micromeritics). Prior to analysis, both aluminas were subjected to
a pretreatment at 250 °C for 2 h to ensure equilibration.28 (link) The PSD was evaluated from the mercury intrusion
process to compare with the N2 desorption PSD. The grain
density, ρg, was measured at an intrusion pressure
of 0.2 MPa, which corresponds to the filling of only the intergrain
porosity with an expected relative uncertainty of 5%. The total porosity
from mercury intrusion, εMIP, was then determined
as
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!