The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Monoclonal anti gfp

Manufactured by Roche
Sourced in United States

Monoclonal anti-GFP is a laboratory antibody product used for the detection and quantification of Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) in various experimental systems. It is a highly specific and sensitive tool for researchers working with GFP-tagged proteins or cells.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

29 protocols using monoclonal anti gfp

1

Transcriptional Regulation Analysis Using ChIP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis (ChIP), gene expression analysis by RT-PCR, protein co-immunoprecipitation assays and western blot analysis were performed as previously described (Gomar-Alba et al., 2017 (link)). In ChIP assays, Dynabeads Protein G magnetic beads were incubated with HA-probe (F-7) antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; SC-7392) or monoclonal anti-GFP (Roche Diagnostics; 11814460001). The primary antibodies used in the western blot analysis were monoclonal anti-HA peroxidase 3F10 antibody (Roche Diagnostics; 12013819001) diluted 1:5000, monoclonal anti-GFP (Roche Diagnostics; 11814460001) diluted 1:5000 and monoclonal anti Cdc2 p34 (PSTAIRE; Santa Cruz Biotechnology; SC-53) diluted 1:2000. Blots were developed using anti-mouse IgG and anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:20,000; Thermo Fisher Scientific; 170-6516 and 31460, respectively) and Supersignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Bands were quantified using an ImageQuant LAS 4000mini Biomolecular Imager (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunoblotting Analysis of Cell Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cell extracts were prepared by incubation in lysis buffer containing 50 mmol/l Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mmol/l NaCl, 150 mmol/l KCl, 1 mmol/l dithiothreitol, 5 mmol/l EDTA, pH 8.0, 1% Nonidet P-40 plus a mix of protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche Diagnostic) and resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (PVDF, Millipore) and incubated with the primary antibodies followed by an anti-immunoglobulin-G-horseradish peroxidase antibody (Bio-Rad). Specific proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) (Amersham). Immunoblotting was performed with: mouse monoclonal anti-Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) (cleaved form, BD Pharmingen), rabbit polyclonal anti-p53 (FL393) mouse monoclonal anti-p53 (DO1) (both from Santa Cruz Biotechnology), monoclonal anti-GFP (Roche Diagnostic), polyclonal anti-Bax (N20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), monoclonal anti-phospho-Histone H2A.X (Ser139) (Millipore) (a kind gift from S. Soddu) and monoclonal anti-β-actin (Calbiochem) antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Yeast Mating Pathway Regulation by Fus2p and Cla4p

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All yeast culture and genetic techniques were performed as previously described [24 (link)]. S. cerevisiae strains used in this study are listed in Table S1 in the Supplementary Materials. Yeast strains were constructed using a PCR-based one-step gene disruption technique [30 (link)]. Various deletion constructs were constructed on centromeric shuttle plasmids and transformed in to yeast for analysis [31 (link)]. The GAL1 promoter was induced for full-length Fus2p and Cla4p expression using 2% galactose and for Fus2p truncations with 2% galactose + 0.2% glucose. To induce mating differentiation, 10 µg/mL α-factor was used. Plasmids used in this study are listed in Table S2 in the Supplementary Materials. Point mutations of FUS2 or CLA4 were generated by PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis. Proteins were prepared by TCA precipitation, resolved on gels with or without Phos-tag (Wako Chemicals, Richmond, VA, USA), and detected on Western blots with monoclonal anti-GFP (Roche, South San Francisco, CA, USA), monoclonal anti-c-Myc (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), monoclonal-HA (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and monoclonal anti-MBP (Millipore, Burlington, MA USA). Band intensity was quantified using a G:BOX imaging system (Syngene, Frederick, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Analysis of mRNP Complex from Yeast Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
mRNP isolation from yeast cells expressing a tagged-version of the nuclear cap-binding complex (Cbc2-protA) was performed as previously described (19 (link)). Total protein extraction from yeast cells was performed by the NaOH-TCA lysis method (31 (link)). Samples were separated on 4–12% SDS-PAGE gels (Invitrogen) and transferred to PVDF membranes. Western-blot analysis was performed using the following antibodies: monoclonal anti-GFP (1:500, Roche Diagnostics); monoclonal anti-Dpm1 (1:2000, Invitrogen); polyclonal anti-Hpr1 (1:1000) (32 (link)); polyclonal anti-Mex67 (1:1000) (32 (link)) and polyclonal IgG-HRP (1:5000, Dakocytomation, to detect protA-tagged proteins). Polyclonal anti-SUMO antisera (1:2000) were obtained from Agrobio following immunization of rabbits with recombinant yeast SUMO expressed in bacteria from pET15-HisScSMT3 (see Supplementary Table S2). Quantification of signals was performed based on serial dilutions of reference samples using the ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Protein Expression Analysis in C. elegans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein lysates were prepared from synchronous populations of young adult or gravid adult worms. Proteins (50 µg) were separated on precast denaturing polyacrylamide gels (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and transferred to PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad) using a Trans-Blot Turbo Transfer System (Bio-Rad). Membranes were blocked and probed with primary antibodies: monoclonal anti-FLAG (Sigma, M8823), monoclonal anti-GFP (Roche, 11814460001), monoclonal anti-TUBULIN ALPHA (AbD Serotec, MCA77G), and anti-mini-AID-tag (MBL International, M214-3). Primary antibodies were detected using HRP-linked secondary antibodies: donkey anti-rat IgG(Jackson ImmunoResearch, 712-035-150) or goat anti-mouse (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 62-6520).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Protein Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Detection in Western blots was performed using monoclonal anti-HA (1:1000; Covance), monoclonal anti-myc (1:1000; 9E10; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), monoclonal anti-GFP (1:100; Roche), monoclonal anti-ubiquitin (P4G7) (Covance), and polyclonal anti-CPY (1:5000; Abcam), anti-Cdc48 (anti-VCP, ab138298; 1:500; Abcam), and anti-Ddi1 (1:5000; Lustgarten and Gerst, 1999 (link)) antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Yeast Protein Extraction and Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein extraction from yeast cells was performed by the NaOH–TCA lysis method (42 (link)). Samples were separated on 4–12% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to PVDF membranes. Western-blot analysis was performed using the following antibodies: rabbit IgG-HRP polyclonal antibody (Dakocytomation), 1:5000; monoclonal anti-GFP (Roche Diagnostics), 1:500; monoclonal anti-HA (Covance), 1:1000; monoclonal anti-Pab1 (Santa-Cruz), 1:1000; polyclonal anti-Yra1 (6 (link)), 1:1000; polyclonal anti-Nab2 (32 (link)), 1:100 000; polyclonal anti-Hpr1 (39 (link)), 1:1000; and polyclonal anti-Mex67 (39 (link)), 1:50 000. Quantification of signals was performed based on serial dilutions of reference samples using the ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Ribosomal Protein Analysis by Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells cultured with or without inhibitor were harvested and suspended with 1 ml of buffer B (50 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM NaCl, and 1 mM DTT, pH 7.5) supplemented with complete mini protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche), and kept on ice. Cell suspension was lysed with glass beads, and supernatant was collected after centrifugation and used for SDS-PAGE with 10% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide gels. To detect GFP-labeled ribosomal proteins or α-tubulin for loading controls, monoclonal anti-GFP (1:5,000; Roche) or anti–α-tubulin (1:5,000; Oncogene Research Products) antibodies were used, respectively. In each case, an anti–mouse immunoglobulin G (H+L) horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody (1:5,000; Promega) was used for secondary antibody reaction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Western Blot Analysis of Parasite Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Parasites were incubated in culture media supplemented with or without 1 μM Shld1 (overexpression assays and Cas9-mediated disruption assays) or 50 nM of rapamycin (inducible knockout assay). Protein extracted from parasites were prepared for Western Blot analysis as described previously (Hettmann C., 2000 (link)), using 12% polyacrylamide gels under reducing condition with 100 mM DTT. Equal number of parasites was loaded per experiment. Polyclonal anti-Tryp-Sub2 (1:1000) (Serpeloni et al., 2011a (link)), monoclonal anti-GFP (1:500) (Roche, #cat11814460001) and monoclonal anti-flag (1:500) (Fisher/Thermo Scientific, #cat 11525702) antibodies were used for specific protein detection respectively. Monoclonal anti-aldolase (1:10.000) (Starnes et al., 2006 (link)) was used as loading control. ImageJ software with the densitometry plugin (Version 1.6, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) was used for protein quantification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Protein Immunoblotting Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were isolated using glass bead lysis as described (Abrams et al, 2014). Protein samples were heated (65°C, 15 min) in SDS–PAGE sample-loading buffer, loaded into 10% bis-acrylamide/SDS gels and separated by electrophoresis. Separated protein samples were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane, blocked in 5% nonfat dry milk and proteins detected using monoclonal anti-GFP (Roche), monoclonal anti-PGK (Invitrogen), and monoclonal anti-Ub (EMD Millipore) antibodies, followed by detection with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (MilliporeSigma) with enhanced chemiluminescence reagent and direct photon emission imaging. Protein bands were quantitated using Image Studio Lite (LI-COR Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!