The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Nanoflex source

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific

The NanoFlex source is a high-performance X-ray source designed for advanced materials analysis applications. It generates a high-intensity, high-brilliance X-ray beam that can be used for various analytical techniques, including X-ray diffraction, X-ray reflectivity, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The NanoFlex source features a compact and stable design, ensuring reliable and consistent performance for demanding research and industrial applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using nanoflex source

1

Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were performed on
a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Lumos instrument. Proteins were introduced
into the instrument via nanospray using a nano flex source from Thermo
Scientific that was modified with a platinum wire to allow the use
of tips pulled from borosilicate glass (Harvard Apparatus GC100T-10).
Nanospray tips were ∼1–15 μm in diameter and had
a taper length of ∼1 mm. Proteins were isolated using the quadrupole
and subjected to CID, HCD, or ETD prior to analysis in an Orbitrap
mass analyzer. In subthreshold CID experiments, CID energy was incrementally
increased until just below the observation of fragment ions, and the
protein ion was then reisolated and subjected to MS3 fragmentation
by CID, HCD, or ETD. For proton transfer charge reduction experiments
(PTCR), nitrogen-adducted fluoranthene (m/z 216 Da) was used as a proton-scavenging anion.43 (link) Following proton transfer during MS2, the desired charge state was isolated and subjected to MS3 fragmentation. All mass spectra were acquired in the Orbitrap mass
analyzer using a resolution of 120,000, and 200 scans were averaged.
Replicate spectra for each condition were collected immediately after
the initial run.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nano-RPLC-MS/MS Analysis of Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The collected fractions were examined by nano-RPLC-MS/MS using a Dionex's Ultimate 3000 RSLCnano system (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA) coupled to a Thermo Scientific Q Exactive mass spectrometer equipped with a NanoFlex source (Thermo Fisher Scientific). A capillary RP-LC column (75 um i.d. x 150mm, filled with Acclaim PepMap RSLC C18, 100Å, 2 um, nanoViper Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA) was used for separation of peptides by LC. First, samples were desalted from the autosampler at 5 μL/min by loading onto a trap column (Acclaim PepMap 100 C18, 100 Å, 3 μm, 75 μm×2 cm, Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA). Thereafter, desalted samples were washed for 12 min with 0.1% FA in HPLC grade water and the system changed into line with the analytical RP capillary column. The tryptic digest was analyzed within 65 min 3-step gradient (80% ACN in 0.1% methanol from 4% to 50% over 45 min, 50% to 90% over 5 min and kept at 95% for 15 min) at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. Key parameter settings for the Thermo Scientific Q Exactive mass spectrometer were as follows:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analyzed on a LC/MS system comprised of an Easy nLC 1000 (Thermo) coupled to a Q Exactive hybrid quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer with a NanoFlex source (Thermo Scientific). Peptides were trapped on an Acclaim PepMap 100 (75 µm × 20 mm, Thermo Scientific) and desalted. Chromatography was performed on an analytical column (75 µm × 150 mm, Thermo Scientific) packed with C18, 2 µm particles using a 115-min water/acetonitrile reversed-phase gradient method.
The Q Exactive was operated in data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode. Full scan MS spectra (m/z 400–1800) were acquired in the Orbitrap analyzer with a resolving power of 70,000 (at m/z 200). The fifteen most intense multiply charged ions (z ≥ 2) were sequentially isolated with a 1.0 Da isolation width and fragmented in the collision cell by higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD). Fragment ions were mass analyzed to a 35,000 resolving power (at m/z 200).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Orbitrap Exploris 480 MS Proteomics Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Orbitrap Exploris 480 Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) is equipped with an Easy nLC-1200 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and a Nanoflex source (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The peptides were re-dissolved in 12 μL loading buffer (0.1% FA). Peptide samples were loaded onto a trap column (100 μm × 2 cm, homemade; particle size, 3 μm; pore size, 120 Å; SunChrom, USA), separated by a homemade silica microcolumn (150 μm × 30 cm, particle size, 1.9 μm; pore size, 120 Å; SunChrom, USA) with a gradient of 4–100% mobile phase B (80% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid) at a flow rate of 600 nL min−1 for 150 min.
LC–MS/MS based proteomic and phosphoproteomic experiments were conducted with Field Asymmetric Ion Mobility Spectrometry (FAIMS). FAIMS voltages were set to −45 V and −65 V, respectively, and other parameters were consistent and set as follows: protein quantification consisted of an MS1 scan at a resolution of 120,000 (at 400 m/z). The automatic gain control (AGC) for full MS and MS/MS was set to 3e6 and 5e4, respectively, with maximum ion injection times of 80 and 22 ms, respectively. The signature was collected and recorded by the Xcalibur (v4.5) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Optimized LC-MS/MS Peptide Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liquid chromatography for all LC-MS/MS runs was performed on an EASY-nLC 1000 Liquid Chromatography system (Thermo Scientific) coupled to the spectrometers via modified NanoFlex sources (Thermo scientific). Peptides were loaded onto 250-mm x 75-μm PicoFrit (C18 2 μm medium) analytical columns (New Objective) at a maximum pressure of 800 bar. Solutions A and B for the UPLCs were 0.1% formic acid in water and acetonitrile, respectively. Samples were loaded in 0.1% formic acid in water to maximize retention of highly hydrophilic peptides. Gradients varied slightly in length (90 to 150 min) and mixture, and may be extracted from the respective raw files. In general they incorporated a linear gradient from very low or zero %B to 20 or 30% for 65-100 minutes, followed by a steeper phase and a wash. This length of gradient was maintained despite the relative simplicity of the protein mixture in order to improve the resolution and identification of as many modified peptide forms as possible, including those of low abundance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Peptide Separation and Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liquid chromatography for all LC-MS/MS runs was performed on an EASY-nLC 1000 Liquid Chromatography system (Thermo Scientific) coupled to the spectrometers via modified NanoFlex sources (Thermo scientific). Peptides were loaded onto 250-mm x 75-μm PicoFrit (C18 2 μm medium) analytical columns (New Objective) at a maximum pressure of 800 bar. Solutions A and B for the UPLCs were 0.1% formic acid in water and acetonitrile, respectively. Samples were loaded in 0.1% formic acid in water to maximize retention of highly hydrophilic peptides. Gradients varied slightly in length (90 to 150 min) and mixture, and may be extracted from the respective raw files. In general they incorporated a linear gradient from very low or zero %B to 20 or 30% for 65-100 min, followed by a steeper phase and a wash. This length of gradient was maintained despite the relative simplicity of the protein mixture in order to improve the resolution and identification of as many modified peptide forms as possible, including those of low abundance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Optimized LC-MS/MS Peptide Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liquid chromatography for all LC-MS/MS runs was performed on an EASY-nLC 1000 Liquid Chromatography system (Thermo Scientific) coupled to the spectrometers via modified NanoFlex sources (Thermo scientific). Peptides were loaded onto 250-mm x 75-μm PicoFrit (C18 2 μm medium) analytical columns (New Objective) at a maximum pressure of 800 bar. Solutions A and B for the UPLCs were 0.1% formic acid in water and acetonitrile, respectively. Samples were loaded in 0.1% formic acid in water to maximize retention of highly hydrophilic peptides. Gradients varied slightly in length (90 to 150 min) and mixture, and may be extracted from the respective raw files. In general they incorporated a linear gradient from very low or zero %B to 20 or 30% for 65-100 minutes, followed by a steeper phase and a wash. This length of gradient was maintained despite the relative simplicity of the protein mixture in order to improve the resolution and identification of as many modified peptide forms as possible, including those of low abundance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!