The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using sc 514032

1

Protein Expression Profiling in Spinal Cord

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein from the spinal cord tissue was purified using protein extraction reagents containing 1% protease and phosphatase inhibitors. The protein concentration of each sample was quantified with Carmassi Bradford reagents (Thermo). An equivalent amount of protein (60 µg) was separated by 10% SDS‐PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membranes (Bio‐Rad). After blocking with 5% (w/v) non‐fat milk, the membranes were further incubated with primary antibody solutions overnight at 4°C. The following primary antibodies were including: TrkA (ab‐76291, Abcam, 1:5000), FGFR1 (ab‐58516, Abcam, 1:1000), P‐AKT (sc‐514032, Santa Cruz, 1:1000), AKT (sc‐81434, Santa Cruz, 1:1000), P‐ERK (sc‐16982, Santa Cruz, 1:1000), ERK (sc‐514302, Santa Cruz, 1:1000), Bcl‐2 (60178‐1‐Ig, proteintech, 1:3000), Bax (60267‐1‐Ig, proteintech, 1:2000), cleaved caspase‐3 (sc‐373730, Santa Cruz, 1:500), GAP43 (ab75810, Abcam, 1:10 000), GFAP (ab7260, Abcam, 1:2000), NF‐200 (ab8135, Abcam, 1:5000) and GAPDH (K200057M, Solarbio, 1:5000). After three washed with TBST, the membranes were incubated with a 1:10 000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase‐conjugated secondary antibodies for 60 minutes at room temperature. Finally, signals were visualized by Chemi DocXRS + Imaging System (Bio‐Rad). All experiments were repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of AKT Phosphorylation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thirty hours after transfection, SKBR3 cells were lysed in RIPA buffer, and protein concentrations were measured by Bradford assay. Total protein was separated by SDS-PAGE using a 10% polyacrylamide gel and electroblotted onto a PVDF. The membrane was immunoblotted overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies against phospho-AKT (Santa Cruz, USA, sc-514032), AKT (cell signaling), and β-actin (Santa Cruz, USA, sc-130301) and a secondary goat anti-mouse antibody (BIORAD, USA, 1721011) were diluted according to the manufacturers' instructions and was incubated with the membrane for 1 h after three washes with TBST. Signals were detected with ECL detection reagent (Pierce, Rockford, IL). The images were obtained by Quantity One (Bio-Rad). Original blots are shown in Supplementary Figure 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunofluorescence Staining for Neuronal Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed in 4% PFA in Pagano solution (250 mm sucrose, 25 mm MgCl2, 2.5 mm KCl, 25 mm HEPES, pH 7.4; + phosphatase inhibitors for phospho immunostaining) for 15 min at room temperature, rinsed 3× for 5 min in Pagano, and incubated with blocking solution (Pagano + 0.25% Saponin + 2% BSA) for 1 h. Cells were incubated in primary antibodies diluted in blocking solution for 1 h, rinsed 3× for 5 min with Pagano solution, incubated with appropriate secondary for 1 h, then rinsed 3× for 5 min with Pagano solution. The primary antibodies used were anti-MAP2 (1:250, Chemicon, ab5756), anti-SMI-312 (1:1000, Covance, SMI312R), anti-p-Akt (1:100, Santa Cruz, sc-514032), Cat-315 (1:20, from R. Matthews; Dino et al., 2006 (link)), CS56 (1:200, Abcam, ab11570), and anti-DCX (1:500, gift from C. Walsh; Gleeson et al., 1999 (link)) polyclonal sera. Appropriate Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated, Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated, and Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated secondary antibodies were used. Hoechst 33342 (2 μg/ml; Invitrogen) was used to counterstain nuclei. Immunohistochemistry for explants was performed as previously described (Nichols et al., 2013 (link)). Images were collected with a Zeiss LSM780 laser scanning confocal microscope (SUNY Upstate Advanced Fluorescence Imaging Core).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!