The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cantilevers

Manufactured by Bruker
Sourced in Germany

Cantilevers are a core component in atomic force microscopy (AFM) instruments. They are small, flexible beams that are used to detect and measure the interactions between a probe tip and a sample surface at the nanoscale level. Cantilevers are designed to respond to very small forces, allowing for high-resolution imaging and measurement of surface topography and properties.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using cantilevers

1

Atomic Force Microscopy of Supported Lipid Bilayers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM experiments were always done in liquid, imaging was performed at the SPM@ISMN facility in Bologna [27, (link)28] (link) using a Multimode VIII (Bruker, Santa Barbara, CA, US) and at the Partnership for Soft Condensed Matter (PSCM) in Grenoble using a Cypher S (Asylum Research, Santa Barbara, CA, US). In the first case images were collected in peakforce tapping using SNL Bruker cantilevers with nominal spring constant of 0.24 N/m and 2-10 nm curvature radius, in the second one Olympus BL-AC40TS cantilevers were chosen to perform tapping mode imaging. Images were processed with Gwyddion (D Nec ˇas & P Klapetek. ''Gwyddion: an open-source software for SPM data analysis, by simply plane-fitting. SLBs and SLBs + SPIONs were prepared according to the previously described protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Atomic Force Microscopy of Self-Assembled Spidroins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For atomic
force electron microscopy (AFM) measurements, self-assembled recombinant
spidroin dispersions were diluted to 0.1 mg/mL by deionized water.
10 μL of the aqueous solution was then added onto a clean mica
surface for coating for 120 s, followed by purging with nitrogen gas.
The morphologies of the nanoparticles and nanofibrils were observed
by an ICON AFM fast scanning system (Bruker ICON). A silicon tip with
a nominal spring constant of 0.4 N/m (ScanAsyst-Air, Bruker) was used
for the AFM measurements. The mechanical properties of self-assembled
spidroins was measured by a cantilever with a spring constant of ≈34.32
N m–1 and a tip radius of 8 nm. Of note, the spring
constant of the cantilevers (Bruker, Germany) was calibrated by a
sapphire wafer. The morphological and mechanical data of self-assembled
spidroins were processed by the software NanoScope Analysis 1.8.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Surface Characterization by Tapping Mode AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning of the surfaces was performed using tapping mode atomic force microscopy (AFM; Nanowizard 3 from JPK). Cantilevers (Bruker) with a force constant of 3 N m–1 and a resonance frequency of 75 kHz were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Mechanical Characterization of Hydrogels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 48 h of culture, gels were immersed in HBSS and immediately mechanically tested with FV-AFM, as we previously described for embryonic chick tendons and agarose gels (Marturano et al., 2013 (link)). Cantilevers with 0.06 N/m spring constants (Bruker, Camarillo, CA) and either 20 nm or 5 μm tip radius were employed for nano- and microscale measurements, respectively. Indentation force curves were measured over 10×10 μm2 areas, with 256 indentations per area, at two different locations near the gel center. The linear regions of force curves were converted to elastic moduli using an empirically derived calibration curve developed with agarose gel standards, as previously described (Marturano et al., 2013 (link)). In previous work, we derived moduli of embryonic tendon from AFM measurements using either agarose gel standards or Hertzian theory calculations, and found that the two methods yielded similar values of embryonic tendon modulus over the entire range of development (Marturano et al., 2013 (link)). Three different gels were tested for each experimental condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!