The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Vantec 2000

Manufactured by Bruker

The VANTEC 2000 is a high-performance X-ray diffractometer designed for advanced materials analysis. It features a state-of-the-art detection system and a flexible configuration to accommodate a wide range of sample types and measurement requirements.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using vantec 2000

1

X-Ray Diffraction Characterization of Thin Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XRD measurements at small angles were
performed with a Bruker Nanostar system (Cu K α radiation, parallel
beam formed by cross-coupled Goebel mirrors, and a 3-pinhole collimation
system, VANTEC 2000 area z detector). The temperature of the sample
was controlled with a precision of 0.1 K. Samples were prepared as
thin films on Kapton tape or silica wafer substrates. X-ray diffractograms
at wide angles were obtained with the Bruker D8 GADDS system (Cu Kα
line, Goebel mirror, point beam collimator, Vantec2000 area detector).
Experimental diffractograms were analyzed using Topas 3 software (Bruker).
Samples were prepared as thin films on Kapton tape or silica wafer
substrates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Powder SAXS and WAXS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The small angle X-ray diffraction (SAXS) patterns for powder samples were obtained with a Bruker Nanostar system using CuKa radiation and patterns were collected with an area detector VANTEC2000. The temperature of the sample was controlled with precision of AE0.1 K. Wide angle diffractograms (WAXS) were obtained with a Bruker D8 GADDS system (CuKa line, Goebel mirror, point beam collimator, VANTEC2000 area detector). Samples were prepared as droplets on a heated surface.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Structural Characterization of LUVs by SAXS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The structural characteristics of LUVs were studied using small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). SAXS patterns were obtained using a Bruker NanoStar instrument equipped with a turbo rotating anode operated at 50 kV and 50 mA, evacuated beam path, two-pinhole collimators, Göbel mirrors selecting Cu-Kα radiation, and a large 2D Vantec-2000 detector. Samples were measured in 1.5 mm quartz capillaries; the measurement time was 3 h. Scattering patterns were collected in the range 0.006 Å-1 < q < 0.35 Å−1. The sample to detector distance of 67.8 cm was verified using silver behenate as a calibration standard. The SAXS patterns were corrected for sample transmission and empty cell scattering. One-dimensional (1D) SAXS patterns were obtained by azimuthal integration of the resulting 2D images around the beam center, to obtain the intensity (ISAXS) vs. q profiles. The magnitude of the scattering vector was calculated as q = (4π/λ) sin(°/2), where θ is the scattering angle and λ is the X-ray wavelength for Cu-Kα (λ = 1.5418 Å).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Small-Angle X-Ray Diffraction Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The small-angle X-ray diffraction
(SAXRD) measurements were performed with a Bruker Nanostar system
(Cu Kα radiation, parallel beam formed by cross-coupled Goebel
mirrors and 3-pinhole collimation system, area detector VANTEC 2000).
The temperature of the sample was controlled with a precision of 0.1
°C. Samples were prepared as a thin film on a Kapton tape substrate.
For all samples temperature-dependent measurements were performed
in the same manner—data were collected every 5 °C for
60 s. A quasi-monodomain sample was prepared by a mechanical shearing
at elevated temperatures (10 °C below the phase transition point)
on a heating table.
Fitting of the experimental diffractograms
and simulation of the patterns were done using Topas 3 software (Bruker).
Each procedure started with choosing the most probable symmetry of
the lattice. Then, the unit cell parameters, intensities of the (Pseudo-Voigt)
signals, and (1/x) background intensity were considered
as independently adjustable parameters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nanostructural Characterization by SAXS/WAXS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SAXS and WAXS experiments were performed
at the Multipurpose X-ray Instrument for Nanostructural Characterization
(MINA) at the University of Groningen. The instrument is equipped
with a high-intensity Cu rotating anode X-ray source, providing a
parallel collimated X-ray beam with a photon wavelength of λ
= 0.1543 nm. In order to explore a very broad q-range (0.05–8
nm–1), the SAXS data were acquired using two different
sample-to-detector distances of 3 and 0.24 m, while the WAXS measurements
were performed using a sample-to-detector distance of 0.08 m (q-range
8–20 nm–1). The scattering patterns were
collected using a Bruker Vantec2000 detector (pixel size of 68 μm
× 68 μm) and a Bruker Vantec500 detector (pixel size of
136 μm × 136 μm). The samples were prepared by loading
the complex coacervate samples in a sealed glass capillary of 1.5
mm outer diameter with 0.01 mm wall thickness. The SAXS and WAXS patterns
were converted into the 1D scattering intensity profiles by using
Fit2D software. After subtracting the scattering signal from the solvent
background, the three data sets were merged to generate the final
SAXS/WAXS curves, where the scattering intensity profiles are plotted
as a function of the modulus of the scattering vector q = 4πsin
θ/λ. The sample-to-detector distance and the beam center
position were calibrated by using the scattered rings from a standard
silver behenate powder sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Structural Characterization of Functionalized Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1H NMR studies were recorded by using either 200 MHz or 500 MHz NMR Varian Unity Plus. Proton chemical shifts are reported in ppm (δ) relative to the internal standard—tetramethylsilane (TMS δ = 0.00 ppm). For assessing ligand stoichiometry, the nanoparticles were oxidized with I2 and the reaction mixture after the oxidation process was analyzed.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed using Zeiss Libra 120 microscope, with LaB6 cathode, fitted up with OMEGA internal columnar filters and CCD camera. For TEM studies, the solutions of functionalized particles were deposited onto carbon-coated copper grids and then thermally annealed at 120 °C for 3 min and slowly cooled down to 30 °C
The small angle X-ray diffraction (SAXRD) and scattering (SAXS) experiments were realized with the Bruker Nanostar system (CuKα radiation, working in parallel beam geometry formed by cross-coupled Goebel mirrors and 3-pinhole collimation system, area detector VANTEC 2000). The temperature of the sample position was maintained with accuracy of 0.1 °C. Specimens were prepared in thin-walled glass capillaries or as thin films on Kapton tape. For all of the samples, temperature dependent measurements were performed in the same manner—the XRD diffractograms were collected every 5 °C for 300 s with 40 °C/min heating rate between consecutive data collection points.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!