The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

58 protocols using cellcept

1

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of MMF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, sixteen healthy volunteers were enrolled. Healthy male or female subjects 18–55 years of age who gave written informed consent and did not have any disease associated with immune system impairment were included. All subjects received a single oral dose of 1000 mg MMF (CellCept®, Roche Pharma AG, Grenzach Wyhlen, Germany), which is the recommended daily dose for renal transplant patients receiving MMF as maintenance immunosuppressive therapy (1000 mg CellCept® twice daily). A total of twelve subjects received active treatment and four subjects received the placebo. Both PK and PD samples were taken pre-dose (0 h) and at 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 24 h, and 7 days post-dose (Figure 1). This study was approved by the “Medisch Ethische Toetsingscommissie van de Stichting Beoordeling Ethiek Biomedisch Onderzoek” (Assen, The Netherlands) on 30 April 2019 and is registered in the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) under study number NL7804. The study was performed in compliance with the Dutch laws on drug research in humans.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Reliable Orogastric Dosing for IS Maintenance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A pilot study was conducted and demonstrated that orogastric gavage in chair-trained animals was a more reliable and reproducible method to achieve and maintain blood and plasma trough target levels when compared to treat-based voluntarily consumption. Animals were acclimated to the collar, pole capture, and chair restraint. Once acclimated, the animals were trained for insertion of an orogastric feeding tube and were then dosed through the feeding tube with a combination of commercially available IS drugs: a 200 mg/mL oral solution of MMF (Cellcept, Roche Products) and 0.5, 1, or 2 mg coated tablets of rapamycin (aka Sirolimus, Rapamune, Greenstone) crushed in water. The IS regimen was started 3 weeks prior to intrathecal dosing of the test article. Rapamycin (0.75–2 mg/kg, once per day) and MMF (25–100 mg/kg, twice per day) doses were adjusted to maintain a blood target trough level range of 2–3.5 μg/mL of mycophenolic acid and 10–15 μg/L of rapamycin. Rapamycin was used for the entirety of the study, whereas MMF was stopped on study day 60. Trough levels were monitored twice a week, and IS doses were adjusted if the levels were either below or above the target range for two consecutive bleedings. Overall, rapamycin levels were steady and on target.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Kidney Transplant Immunosuppressive Therapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Kidney transplant recipients received the same initial immunosuppressive therapy, except for two patients in the control group who received belatacept (Bristol-Myers Squib, NYC, NY) instead of tacrolimus. The initial immunosuppressive treatment consisted of tacrolimus (Prograft®; Astellas Pharma, Leiden, The Netherlands), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; CellCept®; Roche Pharmaceuticals, Woerden, The Netherlands) and prednisolone treatment. All patients received induction therapy with basiliximab (Simulect®, Novartis Pharma, Arnhem, the Netherlands). The doses, whole blood or plasma target concentrations, and phasing of immunosuppressive therapy have been described elsewhere in detail [36 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Triple-Therapy Immunosuppression Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The immunosuppressive protocol at our institution consists of a triple-drug therapy consisting of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids. Induction therapy included basiliximab 20 mg (Simulect®, Novartis) at day 0 and day 4 after transplantation, 500 mg intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone (Solu Medrol®: Pfizer) pre and 12 h post-operation. Oral tacrolimus (Prograf®, Astellas Pharma) was started at night 1 day before transplantation with a dose of 0.1 mg/kg/day administered in two divided doses. Subsequent doses were adjusted based on clinical evaluation and Tac levels. Mycophenolate mofetil (Cellcept®, Roche) was started with tacrolimus at a dose of 1 g twice a day and adjusted to lower doses in the presence of diarrhea or prolonged fever. The next IV dose of steroid decreased by half in consecutive days to 40 mg/day within one to two weeks post-transplant. Oral prednisolone (15 mg/day) was initiated right after and was tapered every week to a stable period of 5 mg/day.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Kidney Transplant Immunosuppressive Strategies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fifty-one consecutive adult patients (≥ 18 years) who received a kidney transplant were included between March 2019 and August 2019 at the Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients and all living donors before inclusion. All patients could be included, except for patients who also received different organ transplants (i.e. combined transplants). The study was performed in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki (2013) and was approved by the institutional review board of the Erasmus MC (Medical Ethical Review Board number 2018-035).
Donor kidneys in the study included both deceased donor organs and living donor organs (living related donors and living unrelated donors). Kidneys obtained from deceased donors were subjected to either Hypothermic Machine Perfusion (HMP), Normothermic Machine Perfusion (NMP) or Static Cold Storage (SCS).
All patients received induction therapy with either basiliximab (Simulect; Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland), or rATG (Thymoglobulin, Sanofi-Genzyme), or alemtuzumab (Campath, Sanofi-Genzyme, Cambridge, MA). The maintenance immunosuppressive therapy consisted of mycophenolate mofetil (Cellcept; Roche Pharmaceuticals, Basel, Switzerland), glucocorticoids and tacrolimus (Prograft; Astellas Pharma, Leiden, the Netherlands).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Kidney Transplant Immunosuppression Regimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunosuppression regimens were based on institution specific protocols which evolved during the study. Patients received induction therapy including either antithymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin; Genzyme, Cambridge, MA, USA), alemtuzumab (Campath-1H; ILEX, San Antonio, TX, USA), interleukin 2 receptor antagonists (basiliximab) (Simulect; Novartis, Basel, Switzerland), or daclizumab (Zenapax; Roche, Basel, Switzerland) depending on their immunologic risk. Similarly, maintenance immunosuppression protocols changed throughout the study. Regimens consisted of a calcineuin inhibitor (Sandimmune; Sandoz, Holzkirchen, Germany), cyclosporine (Neoral; Novartis) or tacrolimus (Prograf; Astellas, Tokyo, Japan), plus an antiproliferative agent (azathioprine) (Imuran; GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK) or mycophenolic acid (CellCept; Roche), and low-dose corticosteroids. The current standard of care includes tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid, and prednisone.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunosuppressive Regimen for Transplant Models

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following immunosuppressive drugs were used to suppress the immune system of the animals: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) powder for infusion (20mg/kg) (CellCept, Roche, Woerden, The Netherlands), tacrolimus concentrate for infusion (5 mg/ml) (Prograft, Astellas Pharma BV, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands) and oral solution of prednisolone sodium phosphate (5 mg/ml) (Hospital Pharmacy, UMCN St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands). This regimen is similar to the immunosuppressive treatment of patients undergoing solid organ transplantation. To prevent opportunistic infections, all animals received an antibiotic prophylaxis of amoxicillin supplemented with oral suspension of clavulanic acid (250 mg and 62.5 mg per 5 mL, respectively) (Pharmachemie BV, Haarlem, The Netherlands). Oseltamivir phosphate (OSP; 10mg/Kg) was added to the regimes of ferrets receiving antiviral therapy and was provided by Hoffman-La Roche LtD. (Tamiflu, Basel, Switzerland). Preparation of the drugs was done as previous described [5 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Baboon Xenotransplantation with Immunosuppression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All surgical procedures were carried out under general anesthesia with 1–2% isoflurane in oxygen. Following midline incision, the portal and hepatic veins were identified. An arrow double-lumen venous cannula was inserted in the portal vein for NICC infusion under gravity.
Of four baboons receiving WT NICC, two were given 500 U/kg body weight recombinant human anti-thrombin (rhAT; GTC Biotherapeutics, Framingham, MA) infused over 20–25 min; 10–15 min prior to NICC infusion. This was expected to increase circulating AT activity to 15–20 U/mL 16 (link). No immunosuppression was given to WT NICC recipients, but all received intravenous (IV) heparin (100 IU/kg recipient weight) prior to NICC infusion.
Five baboons transplanted with GTKO/CD55-CD59-HT NICC received heparin plus an immunosuppressive regimen based on our clinical islet transplant protocol 19 (link). For the first 3 days, the animals were given 33 mg ATG (Fresenius Biotech GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany) IV and twice daily 500 mg IV mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; CellCept®, Roche, Sydney, Australia). Thereafter, they received twice-daily oral doses of 500 mg MMF and 4.0 mg/kg Tacrolimus (Prograf, Janssen-Cilag Pty Limited, Sydney, Australia) with the dose adjusted to achieve a target trough concentration of 10–15 ng/mL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Mycophenolate Mofetil Administration in Transplant

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; CellCept®, Roche Pharmaceuticals, Basel, Switzerland) was administered at a dose of 20 mg/kg daily from 1 day prior to 6 days post-transplant (Figure 7A) (21 (link)). MMF was resuspended in 5% glucose solution at a concentration of 20 mg/ml. Animals were weighed prior to injection and an appropriate volume of MMF was administered intra-peritoneally using an insulin syringe. Vehicle-treated animals were administered the corresponding volume of 5% glucose solution only.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Pharmacokinetics of MMF in Pediatric SLE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data of patients followed in the Division of Rheumatology of Children's Hospital of Fudan University between December 2015 and December 2017 were included in this study. Patients were enrolled if they fulfilled the following criteria: concentration data for AUC estimation available, diagnosis of SLE according to the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria (Tan et al., 1982 (link); Hochberg, 1997 (link)); treatment with MMF at an initial dosage of 20–40 mg/kg/d twice daily, with a maximum of 1.5 g/d, in addition to prednisolone and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ); treatment with MMF (mycophenolate mofetil capsules (Cellcept®, Roche Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Palo Alto) or mycophenolate mofetil dispersible tablets (Saikeping, Hangzhou Zhongmei Huadong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.)) at a stable dose for at least 10 weeks. Patients were excluded if they were treated with drugs known to effect clinical response, such as cyclosporine, tacrolimus, or methotrexate. Patients' data such as demographics and SLE disease activities were collected at the time of PK evaluation. Only a single time data from each patient were included. The study protocol was approved by the Fudan Children's ethics committee.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!