The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Scd 030

Manufactured by Oerlikon Balzers
Sourced in Liechtenstein, Germany

The SCD 030 is a sputter coater device designed for the deposition of thin films on various substrates. It utilizes the sputtering technique to deposit conductive or non-conductive materials onto the target surface. The core function of the SCD 030 is to provide a controlled environment and process parameters for the thin film deposition.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

18 protocols using scd 030

1

SEM Analysis of 3D-Printed Mesh Microstructure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM analysis of 3D-printed meshes was run with freeze-dried samples that were then covered with a gold layer thickness of 15–20 nm using a Balzers SCD 030 metallizer. Images were obtained in a Philips SEM 505 scanning electron microscope and processed in an image digitizer program (Soft Imaging System ADDA II, SIS). Later, the images were analyzed with ImageJ® software (NIH, United States), and the surface roughness was estimated by the standard deviation of grey values in the image histogram (Wang et al., 2005 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Fungal Spores

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Submerged sporidia harvested from 4-day-old liquid culture and aerial spores from a one-week-old culture on YMPD gel were fixed for one hour in 2.5% of glutaraldehyde 0.1 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at pH 7.4. After fixation, the suspensions were centrifuged and washed thrice for 5 min in distilled water to remove chemicals. Sporidia were then freeze-dried and mounted on aluminum stubs using double-sided carbon tape and Pt-coated in a Balzers SCD 030 sputtering unit. For AS and sporogenesis cycle studies, samples were taken from Petri dish, left to air-dry on the stubs without fixation, and Pt-coating.
Scanning electron micrographs were taken at graded magnifications (between x1000 and x10000) in a JEOL JSM 840-A Scanning Electron Microscope working at 20 kV accelerating voltage and with the Orion 6.60.6. software (E.L.I. Vision) for digital image capture.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterizing Biomaterial Surface Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The three biomaterials were mounted on a glass slide double-sided carbone tape with platinum (20 nm) coated in a Balzers SCD030 sputtering unit. The surface characteristics were then captured using a scanning electron microscope ESEM-FEG XL30 (Philips Electron Optics, Hillsboro, OR, USA) at magnification levels of ×20,000, ×5000, and ×50 for descriptive analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Membrane Degradation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Finally, the degraded and perfused membranes were visually assessed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), in order to evaluate the surface structure alterations due to collagen degradation and sperm cell penetration at the different time periods.
Samples were fixed for 24 h in 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution, then rinsed with PBS and dehydrated twice for 15 min in ascending concentrations of ethanol (50%, 70%, 80%, and 90%, respectively). The membranes were then immersed three times for 15 min in 94% and 60 min in 100% ethanol, respectively. Finally, samples were subjected to critical point drying (Bal-Tec CPD030, Balzers, Liechtenstein). All the samples were then cut in the middle and mounted on SEM mounts (Bal-Tec AG, Blazers, Liechtenstein), with each cut shown on the side of the membrane (i.e., upside-down and vice versa). Samples were gold sputtered (Balzers SCD 030, Balzers Union, Balzers, Liechtenstein) for 60 s in an argon gas atmosphere at a target distance of 50 mm and pressure of 5 Pascal (Pa) at 45 mA. SEM images (Supra 50 VP FESEM, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) were taken at a working distance of 9.2 mm, an acceleration voltage of 10 kV, and a magnification of 5000×.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Biofilm Growth and Plasma Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The biofilms were grown on stainless steel coupons placed in a 12-well polypropylene microplate (Microtech, Naples, Italy). A volume of 1 mL of bacterial suspension at a density of 1 × 108 CFU/mL was added to each selected well and the plate was statically incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. After that, the coupons were washed with 1X PBS, air-dried, and treated with plasma for 0, 3, and 30 min. Samples were fixed in glutaraldehyde (2.5% v/v) for 30 minutes and then dehydrated with cold solutions of ethanol at increasing concentrations (30, 50, 70, 90, 95, and 100% v/v), each for 20 minutes. All samples were dried in a critical point desiccator (Emitech K850, Kent, UK). Then, about 15–20 nm gold spray coating was performed with the Balzers SCD 030 (New York, USA) and the images were achieved using the Supra 40 ZEISS (EHT = 5.00 kV, WD = 22 mm, detector in the lens) (Berlin, Germany) [28 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Biofilm Growth and Plasma Treatment Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biofilms were grown on stainless steel coupons placed in a 24-well polypropylene microplate (Greiner CELLSTAR Sigma Aldrich). Each well was inoculated with 2 mL of a bacterial suspension in LB medium at a final OD550nm of 0.1 and the microplate statically incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Then coupons were rinsed with 1 mL of sterile saline, air-dried, and plasma-treated for 0, 3, and 30 min. Samples were fixed in 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde for 30 min and then rinsed in water to remove excess reagent. Dehydration was carried out by placing the coupons in a series of increasing concentration of cold ethanol solutions. The ethanol concentration in the dehydrating solution was 30, 50, 70, 90, and 95% v/v and each iteration lasted 20 min. Two additional increments at 100% ethanol for 20 min each were added to ensure complete ethanol saturation. All samples were critical-point dried in an EMITECH K850 dryer displacing ethanol with liquid CO2 and further evaporated at 31.1°C and 1072 psi. A ~15–20 nm gold sputter-coating was accomplished in a Balzers SCD 030 apparatus, and images were obtained using a SEM Philips 505 scanning electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Larvae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For SEM, larvae were bathed in hot water for 1.5–2 min. Fixation was carried out in 2.5% glutaraldehyde buffered in 0.05 M Na-cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4, 396 mOsm) at 4°C. After 30 min, approximately the anterior third was cut off and put back in fresh fixative for additional 18 h at 4°C. After fixation, samples were washed three times for 10 min, respectively, in 0.1 M Na-cacodylate (pH 7.4), followed by post-fixation in 1% osmium tetroxide (OsO4) for 2 h at 4°C. After additional washing steps (3 × 10 min with 0.2 M Na-cacodylate, pH 7.4), specimens were dehydrated in ascending ethanol concentrations and then transferred into a critical point device (Bal-Tec CPD 030, Liechtenstein) and dried via CO2. After mounting on aluminum stubs with CCC (Conductive Carbon Cement, Plano GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), specimens were coated in a sputter coater (Balzers SCD 030, Liechtenstein) with 5 nm gold-palladium in order to enhance conductivity. Samples were examined in a FESEM Auriga TM Crossbeam workstation (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Images were analyzed and processed with Image J software (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Gel Formation for SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To produce gels for SEM imaging the solutions were prepared according to the procedure described in Section 2.2. For gelation, the samples were heated in a water bath at 90 °C for 30 min. After cooling, cubes with an edge length of 1 cm were cut from the gels. To observe the optical effects of the thermally induced gel formation, photos were taken after gelation. For freezing the samples were immersed in liquid nitrogen. The sample 100 mM, 5 wt%, Lev4 did not gel during the heat treatment. Therefore, it was placed in a container made of aluminum foil and frozen therein. Immediately after freezing, the samples were dehydrated by freeze drying (Beta 1–8 LSCplus, Martin Christ Gefriertrocknungsanlagen GmbH, Osterode, Germany). Lyophilized samples were carefully broken into pieces and the breakage site was gold sputtered in a sputter coater SCD 030 (Balzers, Wiesbaden-Nordenstadt, Germany). SEM imaging was carried out at the Center for Electron Microscopy (ZELMI, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany) with an S-2700 scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Images were recorded at a magnification of 100×, 300× and 1000×. SEM was carried out at least on time for each formulation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Microstructural Analysis of Nodules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nodules were soaked with low viscosity epoxy in a vacuum before and between cutting. The most representative areas, up to 25 × 45 mm, were selected and then thin sections (about 200 µm thick) were made for SEM investigation. Backscattered electron (BSE) imaging, secondary electron (SE) imaging and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analyses were performed using Tescan scanning electron microscope Mira 3 with analytical equipment of the Oxford Instruments AztecLive Automate with detector Max 80. The SEM was operated at 10 kV for BSE images, 4 kV for SE images and 20 kV for EDS analyses. Sections were subsequently mapped in Si, Mn, Fe, Ca and P X-rays using the Aztec program. Si, Mn, Fe, Ca and P were measured using Kα lines. Investigations of the nodule microstructures were made by SEM analyses with a Mira 3 TESCAN. Polished thin, 150 μm-thick sections were prepared. Fragments of the outer parts and central zone of nodules were selected for the identification of microbial associated structures. The surface of the samples was covered with 15 nm-thick gold with Balzers SCD 030 equipment. Major element concentrations were determined using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy on an X-MAX 80 (EDS, Oxford Instruments, UK). Analyses were conducted at 20 kV using a diaphragm of 60 μm. Data analysis was carried out using the INCA Oxford software package.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Scanning Electron Microscopy Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were xed with 2% paraformaldehyde, dehydrated in ascending ethanol series, and the critical point was reached in a Bal-Tec CPD - 030 with carbon dioxide. The gold plating was obtained in a Balzers SCD-030. SEM analysis were performed in a scanning electron microscope JEOL-JSM 6360 L at the Electron Microscopy Center of UFPR, Curitiba, PR. Brazil.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!