The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

29 protocols using somatom definition flash scanner

1

3D Reconstruction from Heterogeneous Imaging Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The image data available for 3D reconstruction was heterogenous in quality. In eight patients a CT scan had been performed using a Siemens Somatom Definition Flash scanner (Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany). Tube currents were adapted individually according to the body mass (CARE Dose), whereas a constant tube voltage of 100 kV was used (CARE kV). Spatial resolution of the CT images varied from 0.27 × 0.27 mm2 to 0.40 × 0.40 mm2, based on the slice thickness of 0.50–0.70 mm and reconstruction increment of 0.40 mm. While the CT device used has a minimal slice thickness of 0.625 mm, the lower values result from overlapping acquisition and respective reconstruction of the image data. Image acquisition was not ECG gated to reduce applied radiation doses. For one patient, cardiac MRI had been performed using a 1.5 Tesla Philips Achieva scanner (Philips Medical Systems, Best, Netherlands) with a 5-element cardiac phased-array coil. For assessment of the end-diastolic anatomy, a balanced 3D steady-state-free-precession imaging sequence (3 signal averages, navigator gated, ECG triggered) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Optimized CT Imaging Protocol for Comprehensive Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT examinations were performed with a SOMATOM Definition Flash scanner (Siemens, Germany). Automatic exposure control (care KV) and automatic tube current modulation (care dose 4D) were activated on all patients. The preset parameters were as follows: tube voltage: 80–120 kVp, quality reference mAs: 100 mAs, detector collimation: 128×0.6 mm, acquisition matrix: 512×512, field-of-view 314×314 mm, reconstruction source image slice thickness: 1 mm, and inter-slice spacing: 1 mm. Care KV and care dose 4D would adjust appropriate parameters according to patient’s size. (Table 1). All patients were placed in a supine position with the head first. The scanning range was from the lung apex to the adrenal glands. All images included in this study were rated as excellent by the reporting physician in the daily quality control evaluation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Retrospective Analysis of Repaired TAAD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two patients with repaired TAAD were retrospectively selected from the validated database of patients at the Royal Brompton and Harefield hospitals, United Kingdom. The first patient was a 44-year-old male who underwent graft replacement of the ascending aorta. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) in this patient was performed on a Sensation 64 scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Germany), where the slice thickness and increment of CTA images were 1-mm. The second patient was a 51-year-old male, who underwent replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta for TAAD 4 years prior to CTA scan. This patient was examined by a SOMATOM Definition Flash scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Germany), and the images were reconstructed with 0.75-mm slice thickness and 0.5-mm slice increment. All medical data included in this study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the Institutional committee of Health Research Authority (HRA) and Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW). Need for patients’ informed consent was waived.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

MRI-Guided Mock-DBS Surgical Procedure on Cadavers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An MRI-guided mock-DBS surgical procedure using the 3D-printed stereotactic system was developed and performed on human cadavers and deemed exempt by the Mayo Clinic’s Institutional Review Board (Supplemental Information) [30 (link)]. The specimen group consisted of four male human cadaver heads. MRI imaging was conducted in a Siemens™ (Munich, Germany) Magnetom Prisma 3 Tesla MRI, using the MPRAGE pulse sequence. CT imaging was conducted in a Siemens™ Somatom Definition Flash scanner. The surgical time for device platform placement and both unilateral and bilateral lead implantations were recorded in the last four of five experiments. The device platform placed in experiment 1 was left secured to the cadaveric specimen for experiment 2, and thus only three device platform placement times were recorded. After implantation, the vector error (3D Euclidean distance from the distal end of the first contact to the intended target) and the radial error (shortest 2D difference from the intended trajectory to the center of the implanted lead) were calculated using the post-operative CT image.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

High-Resolution CT Imaging of Distal Tibia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT scans of the distal tibia at high‐resolution mode were collected on a 128 slice Siemens SOMATOM Definition Flash scanner (Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) at the University of Iowa Comprehensive Lung Imaging Center. The scans were acquired in single tube spiral acquisition mode using the following parameters: 120 kV; 200 mA effective; 1 second rotation speed; pitch factor 1.0; detector rows 16; scan time 23.2 seconds; collimation 16 × 0.6 mm; total effective dose equivalent 170 μSv ≈ 20 days of environmental radiation in the United States. Siemens z‐UHR scan mode was applied enabling Siemens dual z sampling technology, which splits the signal on 0.6‐mm detectors delivering 0.3 mm effective spatial resolution in the z‐direction.(29) Images were reconstructed at 300 μm thickness and 200 μm slice‐spacing using a normal cone beam method with a special U70u kernel achieving high spatial resolution. Three repeat CT scans were collected for each specimen on the same day after repositioning the specimen on the scanner table between scans. A Gammex RMI 467 Tissue Characterization Phantom (Gammex RMI, Middleton, WI, USA) was scanned on each day of a tibia scan using the same protocol to calibrate CT numbers into BMD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

CT-based 3D Surface Reconstruction of Humerus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Axial CT scans of all humeri were acquired using a Siemens SOMATOM Definition Flash scanner (120 kVp, 100 mAs, 512 × 512 acquisition matrix, 0.6‐mm slice thickness, B50s kernel, 150‐mm field‐of‐view). CT images were segmented and reconstructed in Amira (v5.4.1, FEI, Hillsboro, OR) using semi‐automatic thresholding techniques to identify both the medullary (inner) and periosteal (outer) cortical surfaces. Three‐dimensional surface reconstructions were generated from the respective segmentations. Interoperator surface reconstruction repeatability was assessed for three operators on a single humerus by comparison to reference periosteal and medullary surfaces generated by an experienced segmentation operator from high‐resolution MicroCT (0.059‐mm isotropic voxel spacing, PerkinElmer QuantumFX). Surface deviations from the MicroCT generated reference surface were calculated following iterative closest point alignment. Alignment and surface deviation analyses were performed in 3‐Matic Research 18 (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT imaging was performed using a Somatom Definition Flash scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). CACS was measured using the following parameters: 120 kV, 150 mA, and 3-mm thickness. CACS was calculated using an automated computerized system (Virtual Place, Raijin; AZE Inc., Tokyo, Japan) and the Agatston method, which involved multiplying the area of each calcified plaque by a density factor determined by the peak pixel intensity within the plaque. The plaque-specific scores for all the slices were added together. The density factor was 1, 2, 3, or 4 for plaques with peak intensities of 130–199, 200–299, 300–399, and ≥ 400 Hounsfield units (HU), respectively [15 (link)]. In addition, patients were divided into three groups according to CACS: CACS 0, CACS (1–99), and CACS (≥ 100).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Preoperative Imaging for Deep Brain Stimulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To avoid movement artifacts, preoperative imaging was performed with patients under general anesthesia at a 3 T Magnetom Skyra scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Imaging parameters were used as previously described by Strotzer et al. [34 (link)]. MR imaging included a T1-weighted sequence + one and a half times dose of Gadolinium to visualize crucial blood vessels, a T2-weighted sequence parallel to the AC-PC line to visualize relevant subthalamic structures for targeting and a DTI sequence with 64 gradient directions. DTI imaging included b0 images as well as a b0 image with inverted phase-encoding direction (posterior to anterior, “P2A”). Targets were defined in the dorsolateral aspect of the STN based on the Beijani line [35 (link)] at the anterior border of the red nucleus at its biggest expansion. At the day of surgery, a CT scan with a CRW head ring (Integra Radionics, Burlington, VT) mounted on the patient’s head was performed for definition of stereotactic trajectories at a Somatom Definition Flash scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). MR and CT imaging was fused with Brainlab® iPlanNet 3.0 (BRAINLAB, Munich, Germany). Trajectories were defined avoiding blood vessels, sulci, and eloquent neuronal structures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Contrast-enhanced Imaging of Abdominal Organs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT examination was performed with Siemens Somatom Definition FLASH scanner (Siemens, Germany), with contrast agent Iohexol Injection (300 mg/mL, dose 1.5mL/kg).
MRI examination was conducted with Siemens 3.0T trio class scanner (Siemens AG, Germany), and contrast agent was Gadolinium diethylenetriaminepenta-acetic acid (Gd-DTPA, Bayer Schering Pharm AG, Germany, dose 0.2 mmol/kg).
Each contrast-enhanced examination was recorded at 25s, 75s and 120s after contrast injection, corresponding to the arterial phase, portal phase and delayed phase.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

4D-CT Imaging of Sedated Animals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sedated animals were immobilized using a vacuum mattress and thermoplastic mask for reproducible positioning (Fig. S3). The CT reference point (calibrated room laser) was marked on the mask with radio-opaque markers and tattooed on the skin. Cardiac-gated (4-dimensional [D]), native and contrast-enhanced CT scans (10 phases) were acquired using a 64 row Siemens Somatom Definition Flash scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany). Scans were acquired at end-expiration using a 25 sec. respirator breath-hold remotely controlled through a Labview software interface (National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA). For enhanced scans, 50cc contrast medium were injected (4cc/sec, 8–10 sec. delay, Omnipaque 350 mg I/cc, GE Healthcare, USA). A field of view of 400 mm and 1 mm slice thickness was reconstructed. The native 4D-CT protocol was validated against the standard planning CT protocol of the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT) for correct HU and resulting ion beam ranges.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!