The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using abi fast sybr green master mix

1

Extraction and Quantification of RNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was prepared from cells using RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (QIAGEN) following manufacturer's protocol. RNA concentration was measured using NanoDrop (Wilmington, DE, USA). Reverse transcription was performed using iScript DNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and qRT-PCR reactions were performed using ABI Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) as previously described [36 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Validating HIST1H1A target genes by ChIP-qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP-qPCR was used to validate target genes derived from the ATAC-seq analysis. Three independent clonal isolates from LNCaP cells stably over-expressing HIST1H1A or control vector were used for ChIP assays as previously described [45 (link)]. Briefly, 1% formaldehyde was used to fixed cells, followed by cell lysis. Cell lysates were pre-cleared with Protein G Sepharose beads (GE Healthcare), then incubated with HIST1H1A (HPA043753, Sigma Life Science) or IgG (12-370, Millipore), and Protein G Sepharose beads were added for overnight incubation at 4° C. NaCl was used for reverse cross-linking, and DNA was extracted using Qiaquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen). The DNA product was used for ChIP-qPCR analysis, and samples were amplified in duplicates using ABI Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY USA). Student’s T-tests was used to calculate statistical significance, and data are presented as mean ± SD with P < 0.05 being considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP assays were performed as previously described [38 (link)]. Briefly, after pre-clearing with Protein G Sepharose beads (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA), antibodies targeting endogenous NDN (N-20, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), HA (anti-HA, Roche) or IgG (12-370, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) was added to the sonicated cell lysates and incubated at 4°C for 2 hours. Protein G Sepharose beads were then added and incubated overnight. The following day, immunocomplexes were washed twice with lysis buffer, once with high salt buffer (50 mM HEPES-KOH pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate), twice with LiCl buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.25 M LiCl, 0.5% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA) and once with TE buffer, followed by elution in TE buffer containing 1% SDS. Samples were incubated at 65°C overnight for reverse-crosslinking, and treated with RNAse A and proteinase K the next day. ChIP DNA was purified using QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN) according to manufacturer's protocol. The DNA obtained was analyzed either by high-throughput sequencing or qPCR. All ChIP-qPCR reactions were performed in duplicate using ABI Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (Life Technologies) mentioned above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Roots were dipped in a solution containing an amino acid or plant hormone. Roots and fourth leaves harvested from 2 plants were pooled, and total RNA was isolated from each pool using an RNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen). cDNA was generated from 0.5 μg of total RNA with a ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Master Mix reagent kit (Toyobo) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. qPCR was performed on an ABI 7500 Fast Real-time PCR System with ABI Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (Life Technologies). Amplification was performed by two-step PCR with 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 3 s and extension/detection at 60 °C for 30 s. UBQ (Shimono et al. 2007) and elongation factor 1a (eEF-1a) [32 (link)] were used as internal standards for leaves and roots, respectively. Primer sets for PCR (Additional file 3) were tested by dissociation curve analysis and verified to confirm that the absence of non-specific amplification. Gene names which we analyzed by qPCR, are listed in Additional file 3.
For microarray analysis, roots were treated with Glu solution or water as mock, fourth leaves were harvested and pooled as described above. Total RNA was isolated by using an RNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen). Microarray analysis was performed as described [10 (link)] (Shimono et al. 2007).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transcriptomic Analysis of HIST1H1A Overexpression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from clonal isolates of PC-3 or LNCaP cells expressing HIST1H1A or the control vector using RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (QIAGEN). The concentration and purity of isolated RNA was measured using a NanoDrop (Wilmington, DE USA). Total RNA was reversed transcribed using iScript DNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. qRT-PCR were performed for gene expression using ABI Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY USA) as previously described [45 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of mRNA Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Lipid Tissue Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). cDNA was synthesized from RNA using the ABI High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Life Technologies/Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). qPCR was performed on an ABI7500 instrument using the ABI Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (Life Technologies/Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Relative mRNA abundance was calculated as relative Ct value and normalized to 18 s by the ΔΔCt method. Primer sequences are available upon request.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

RNA Extraction and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Lipid Tissue Mini Kit (Qiagen) for animal tissues and the Direct-zol RNA microprep kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) for cell culture samples. cDNA was synthesized from RNA using the ABI High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Life Technologies/Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). qPCR was performed on an ABI7500 instrument using the ABI Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (Life Technologies/Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for animal tissues and 2x SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (Bimake, Houston, TX, USA) for cell culture samples. Relative mRNA abundance was calculated as relative Ct value and normalized to 18 s for animal tissues and GAPDH for cell culture samples by the ΔΔCt method. Primer sequences are available upon request.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of immune genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative real-time PCR assay was performed as previously described33 (link). Total RNA was harvested from cells using an RNeasy kit (Qiagen) and subjected to DNase I digestion (New England BioLabs). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using an Applied Biosystems ABI Prism 7900HT instrument with ABI Fast SYBR green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), and data were normalized to endogenous control 18 S rRNA. Relative expression or fold induction was calculated using 2−ΔΔCt method with the normalized Ct value of the untreated or mock treated sample at the earliest time point being the baseline. Primers for mouse genes were chosen according to the recommendation of the qPrimerDepot database39 (link). Primer sequences were as follows: mouse IFN-β, AATTTCTCCAGCACTGGGTG and AGTTGAGGACATCTCCCACG; mouse RANTES, CTGCTGCTTTGCCTACCTCT and CACTTCTTCTCTGGGTTGGC; mouse IL-6,; 18 s rRNA, CCTGCGGCTTAATTTGACTC and AACCAGACAAATCGCTCCAC; HSV-1 ICP27, CCTTTCTCCAGTGCTACCTG and GCCAGAATGACAAACACGAAG; HSV-1 UL23, AGAAAATGCCCACGCTACTG and CACCTGCCAGTAAGTCATCG; HSV-1 UL44, CGACTACAGCGAGTACATCTG and CGATTCCAATCCCCACCC.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Fracture Callus RNA Isolation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fracture samples were fixed for 24 hours in cold 4% paraformaldehyde, decalcified for 5 weeks in 10% EDTA, processed, and embedded in paraffin blocks. Transverse paraffin-embedded sections were prepared as described.(35 (link)) To obtain RNA, 16 days postfracture six WT and six KO calluses were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, ground into powder in the presence of liquid nitrogen using a sterilized mortar and pestle, and isolated with a kit from Ambion (distributed by Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA; Cat# AM1912) per the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA yield was determined on Tecan Infinite M200 (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland). RNA was converted to cDNA using Applied Biosystems (ABI) High-Capacity RNA-to-cDNA kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA; cat# 4387406) and qPCR was performed using ABI Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems; cat# 4385612) on StepOne Plus real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Analysis was performed using the delta delta threshold cycle (ΔΔCT) method, and statistical tests were run on Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification of KCC Isoforms by qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg total RNA using QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Reverse transcribed KCC1, KCC2, KCC3, KCC4 and L32 (housekeeping gene) mRNAs were quantified by PCR using the StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR System, the ABI Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and specific primers (Supplementary Table 2). PCR reactions were performed in triplicate and the data analyzed with the ΔΔCt method as described86 (link). After normalization to internal control L32, the results were expressed as fold change relative to KCC2a or total KCC2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!