The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Tm 1000 tabletop sem

Manufactured by Hitachi
Sourced in Japan

The TM-1000 tabletop Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) is a compact and versatile instrument designed for high-resolution imaging of a wide range of samples. It features a simple and user-friendly interface, making it suitable for both educational and research applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using tm 1000 tabletop sem

1

Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization and SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cryosectioned animals were processed after fluorescent in situ development as previously described (Tu et al., 2012 (link)). For nuclear fast red staining, animals were processed for colorimetric ISH and were subsequently fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde (PBS) at 4°C followed by dehydration in 30, 50, and 70% ethanol. Fixed specimens were embedded in paraffin and serial sectioned at 10 μm thickness and counter stained with nuclear fast red.
For scanning electron microscopy, animals were immersed in a relaxant fixative (1% HNO3, 0.85% formaldehyde, 50 mM MgSO4) as described elsewhere (Rompolas et al., 2013 (link)) for 5 min and were replaced with fresh fixative and rocked overnight at room temperature. Animals were then transferred to a solution containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde, 2% paraformaldehyde, 1% sucrose, 1 mM CaCl2 in 0.05 M NaCacodylate buffer pH 7.36 and left at 4°C until ready for processing. Animals were rinsed in ultrapure water, and secondary fixation was performed at 4°C overnight in 2% aqueous osmium tetroxide. Samples were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol and dried in a Tousimis Samdri-795 critical point dryer. Samples were mounted on stubs and sputter coated with gold palladium. Imaging was done with a Hitachi TM-1000 tabletop SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Nanoparticle Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All extinction spectra were obtained using a Cary 50 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was conducted with a Hitachi TM-1000 Tabletop SEM (Tokyo, Japan). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was conducted with a Philips FEI Tecnai 12 TEM (Andover, MA) in CFAMM at UC Riverside.
Mass spectra were collected using a Voyager-DE STR MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Framingham, MA) set in positive reflector mode at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV. The spectrometer is equipped with a pulsed nitrogen laser operating at 337 nm, with each spectrum acquired as an average of 60 laser shots.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Analyzing Wood Particle Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The
morphology of the
ball-milled birch and spruce wood particles was studied with a tabletop
scanning electron microscope (Hitachi TM-1000 Tabletop SEM, Tokyo,
Japan). The acceleration voltage was 15 kV, and the current was between
31.7 and 34.9 μA. 100× and 500× magnifications were
used, and for all samples, the working distance varied between 5760
and 6160 μm. The samples were placed on a carbon tape for imaging
and were not coated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

SEM Sample Preparation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 1 hr at room temperature (then stored at 4°C until processing) and treated with tannic acid, osmium, thiocarbohydrazide, and osmium (TOTO) as described in Jongebloed et al. (1999) (link). Samples were then dehydrated in an ethanol dilution series, critical point dried in a Tousimis Samdri 795 CPD, mounted on stubs and coated with gold palladium. Samples were imaged in a Hitachi TM-1000 tabletop SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analyzing Wood Particle Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The
morphology of the
ball-milled birch and spruce wood particles was studied with a tabletop
scanning electron microscope (Hitachi TM-1000 Tabletop SEM, Tokyo,
Japan). The acceleration voltage was 15 kV, and the current was between
31.7 and 34.9 μA. 100× and 500× magnifications were
used, and for all samples, the working distance varied between 5760
and 6160 μm. The samples were placed on a carbon tape for imaging
and were not coated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Morphological Analysis of Extruded Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the different samples was investigated using a Hitachi TM-1000 tabletop SEM (Tokyo, Japan) (10 kV voltage, 6 mm working distance, backscattering mode). The extruded samples were immersed in liquid nitrogen for 5 min and then fractured. The cryo-fractured cross-sections of the samples were placed on a conductive carbon tape. To evaluate the structure of the samples after being immersed in MQw for 24 h, the extruded swollen samples were frozen at −25 °C during 24 h and then lyophilized for 48 h. The lyophilized samples were immersed in liquid nitrogen and cryo-fractured. The surface morphology was analyzed using a Hitachi S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM). A voltage of 3 kV and a current of 10 µA were used. The lyophilized materials were sputtered with a palladium/platinum (Pt/Pd) target in an Agar High Resolution Sputter Coater (model 208RH). The sputtering time for all samples was 45 s proving an estimated conductive layer of 1–2 nm. The pore size of the extrudates was estimated using ImageJ® [42 (link)], taking at least 50 measurements and reporting the average and standard deviation. The pore size measurements were made using 500× images, and when no porosity was observed at this magnification, the sample was considered non-porous.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Flower Anatomy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Open flowers were infiltrated with a solution of glutaraldehyde (2.5%) and paraformaldehyde (2%) in phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.2), dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, transferred to a mixture of ethanol and hexamethyldisilazane at increasing concentrations of 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%, and dried overnight. Dried anthers were mounted on specimen stubs using double-sided copper tape. The samples were coated with gold/palladium in a sputter coater (Balzers SCD 030; Leica, Vienna, Austria) and imaged using SEM (S800; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Petals were directly observed with a Hitachi TM-1000 table-top SEM. Single flowers from young buds were selected for TEM analysis as described previously (Cheminant et al., 2011) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cryo-fractured Foam Morphology Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the samples was analysed using a FE-SEM Hitachi S-4800 at a voltage of 3 kV and a current of 10 µA. The foamed samples were frozen by immersing them in liquid nitrogen for 1 minute and then breaking them into pieces. The cryo-fractured pieces were fixed onto aluminum specimen holders using conductive carbon tape. The samples were coated with palladium/platinum, using an Agar High-Resolution Sputter Coater (model 208RH) for 30 s. The samples’ morphology of the foams compressed at the same repetitive compression strain was observed using a Hitachi Tabletop SEM (TM-1000, Japan) at a 10 kV voltage. The average cell pore size was obtained from a minimum of 50 measurements in SEM micrographs using the image analysis software Image J.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Ultrastructural Microscopy of Plant Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The root samples were first soaked in 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution (25% glutaraldehyde/1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0)/ddH2O = 1:1:8) overnight at 4°C, then fixed with 1% osmic acid for 1–2 h at room temperature. The fixed samples were dehydrated with a graded ethanol series (50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95% and 100% ethanol). The dehydrated samples were treated as follows: (1) for SEM, the dehydrated samples were treated with mixture of ethanol and isoamyl acetate and isoamyl acetate, respectively, then the samples were critical-point dried in liquid CO2, fastened on metallic stubs, coated with gold powder and viewed using Tabletop SEM TM-1000 (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan); (2) for TEM, the ethanol-dehydrated samples were permeated with grated embedding agent and finally embedded in pure Spurr resin and polymerized at 70°C. The embedded samples were cut in an ultramicrotome, the thin slice was stained with 2% (w/v) uranyl acetate for 5 min and Reynolds’ lead citrate for 2 min at 25°C and then observed using a JEM-1010 EX electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Microscopic Particle Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The processed samples were individually placed on a microscope slide. They were examined within one hour on an AxioScope A1 light microscope (Zeiss, Germany) using an AxioCam 3 digital video camera (Zeiss, Germany). The length and width of each particle were measured using the Axio Vision 4.2 program (Zeiss; Oberkochen, Germany). Their morphologies were evaluated by SEM using a Hitachi S-3400N (Hitachi; Tokyo, Japan) with an ultra-dry energy dispersive spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA) or with a tabletop SEM TM1000 (Hitachi; Tokyo, Japan). When examined under the S-3400N microscope, the samples were sprayed with platinum; they remained unsprayed when using the TM1000. The definitions of morphotypes as well as the descriptions of phytoliths and other unidentified mineral particles were carried out according to the International Code for Phytolith Nomenclature 1.0 (Madella et al., 2005) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!