The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using escalab xi spectrometer

1

Surface and Chemical Analysis of HAP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphology of the pressed HAP samples, before and after treatments, was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using an Apreo S ThermoFisher machine with a resolution of 0.7 nm. The chemical composition of HAP samples, before and after treatments, was determined by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The XPS spectra were acquired using an ESCALAB™ XI+ Spectrometer from Thermo Scientific, with a monochromatic Al Kα source at 1486.6 eV. The survey spectra were recorded with a step of 1 eV, while the high-resolution spectra were recorded with a step of 0.1 eV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Sulfate Detection in Mussel Plaques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sulfate-mediated coacervation is not biologically relevant to mfps in plaques, unless sulfate levels are elevated at the plaque interface. A two-component 5-min epoxy was mixed and deposited into a 6 mm by 6 mm square face mold (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA). A fresh mussel plaque was excised from the mussel using a clean single-edge razor and mounted with the thread down (plaque interface up) into the exposed underside of partially cured epoxy. Sulfate was detected via x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy using a Thermo Fisher Scientific ESCALAB XI spectrometer with Al Kα x-ray source. An overview spectrum was gathered from 700 to 0 eV with a 0.5-eV step size and 100-ms dwell time. A high-resolution spectrum of the sulfur K-edge was then collected from 175 to 144 eV with a 0.1-eV step size and 250-ms dwell time and summed over six scans. Sulfate was identified using the Casa software (Teignmouth, UK), fitting the S 2p3/2 with a Gaussian function centered at 168.12 eV, with a full width height mean of 1.35 eV separated from 2p1/2 by 1.18 eV (169.3 eV) constrained to an intensity ratio of 2:1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of MXene Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The optical absorption spectra of the dispersion sample were recorded on an ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometer (V-770, JASCO). Raman spectra in the radial-breathing mode region were recorded on an inVia Raman Microscope (Renishaw) excited by 785-nm laser light. A single-monochromator micro-Raman spectrometer was employed in the back-scattering configuration. The sample dispersions were drop-casted onto a silicon wafer before the measurement. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data were obtained using an ESCALAB XI + spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using 300 W Al–Ka radiation. To exclude the substrate signals, a highly concentrated MXene dispersion was drop-coated several times onto a Si/SiO2 wafer to form a thick MXene film (>10 nm). Atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements were acquired using a Dimension Fastscan AFM with a NanoScope V stage controller (Bruker). The samples for AFM observation were prepared by spin-coating the Si/SiO2 wafer with 10 µl of the MXene dispersion at 400 rpm for 60 s, followed by 1,000 rpm for 60 s and 1,600 rpm for 60 s. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurements were conducted in an S-4300 (Hitachi) or an ETHOS NX5000 (Hitachi). X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra were obtained by a SmartLab (Rigaku) through Cu Kα radiation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Characterization of Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UV-vis absorption spectra were recorded on an Evolution 220 UV-vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher, USA) using a quartz cell with 1 cm path length. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was carried out on the JEOL JEM 2100F equipment (JEOL, Japan) for morphology observation. All the average sizes were obtained by measuring more than 100 dispersive nanoparticles. The images of elements distribution were observed by the energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) on the JED2300 equipment (JEOL, Japan). X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed on an ESCALAB Xi+ spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, USA) with monochrome Al Kα X-rays. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) data were collected on a Rigaku SmartLab SE diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation (Japan). Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was performed using a Bruker Dimension Icon Microscope (Bruker, USA), and the samples were dispersed on a mica plate for the test. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was conducted on a Thermo IN10 FTIR microscope (Thermo Fisher, USA). Electron paramagnetic resonance spectra (EPR, EMXPLU-12) was recorded to detect ˙OH.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Spectroscopic Analysis of PEI/Glucose Coatings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For UV–vis spectrum measurement, PEI/glucose (2:1 by weight) solutions were firstly coated on the quartz substrate and then heated to different temperature for 10 min. After that they were placed in the solid-state sample holder, while the reference sample holder was a clean quartz substrate. The transmittance spectra from 300 to 800 nm of the samples were measured using a UV spectrometer (UV 2700, Shimadzu Co., Japan) and the transmittance data measured at 380 nm were reported as a function of heating temperature. X-ray photoelectron (XPS) spectroscopy analysis of the PEI/glucose (2:1 by weight) mixtures coated on the silicon wafer after heating to 30, 80 and 100 °C for 10 min was conducted on the ESCALAB Xi + spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Ltd., Germany). For Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) characterization, the PEI/glucose (2:1 by weight) solutions were firstly freeze-dried to form a gel-like solid samples and then placed on the sample holder of attenuated total reflectance (ATR) accessory. The sample was immersed for 10 min at 30, 80 and 100 °C in sequence, before the corresponding FTIR spectrum were acquired on an In situ ATR-FTIR spectrometer (IN 10, Thermo Fisher Scientific Ltd., Germany) in a range from 1000 to 4000 cm−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Materials Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Use Bruker AXS D8 advance X-ray diffractometer (XRD) to test the phase composition of the sample. The radiation source is Cukα rays. Test conditions: tube voltage 40 kV, tube current 40 mA, scanning range 10–80°; the morphology and energy spectrum were analyzed through Thermal field emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM, JSM-7610F) under an acceleration voltage of 11 kV, and energy disperse spectroscopy (EDS, NORAN System7), respectively; X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was carried out on a ThermoFischer, ESCALAB Xi+ spectrometer using the monochromatic Al Kα excitation source (1486.6 eV). The excitation, emission spectra and fluorescence lifetime of the samples were measured with the FLS1000 steady-state transient fluorescence spectrometer from Edinburgh, UK. The 450 w of xenon lamp was used as the excitation source, and the excitation and emission slits were 0.2–1 nm. All tests are performed at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Material Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of all samples was observed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) conducted on an FEI Apreo S instrument. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were acquired using a Rigaku SmartLab SE X-ray diffractometer. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms were measured at −196 °C with a Micromeritics ASAP2460 sorption analyzer. The Au content measurement of all samples was performed using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) on a Agilent 725 instrument. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed using a Thermo ESCA LAB Xi+ spectrometer to analyze the state of the gold and manganese species in the samples, and the results were calibrated using the C 1s peak at 284.8 eV. Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were collected on a Thermo Nicolet iS20 spectrometer. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of the samples, at temperatures ranging from 25–800 °C, was performed using a Henven HTG-4 analyzer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Material Characterization Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the samples were recorded on a Bruker D8 (Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany) advanced diffractometer using a Cu Kalpha radiation (λ = 0.15405 nm). The morphologies of the samples were investigated by scanning electron microscope (SEM, GeminiSEM 500, Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Hitachi HT-7700 at 100 kV, Hitachi Limited, Tokyo, Japan). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) was acquired using a Nicolet iS10 FT-IR spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Raman spectroscopies were studied by a single monochromator with a microscope (Renishaw inVia, Renishaw plc, London, UK) equipped with CCD array detector (1024 × 256 pixels) and an edge filter and 633 nm. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was measured with a Thermo Fisher Scientific ESCALAB Xi+ spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a monochromatic Al Kα radiation. The binding energies were calibrated using the C 1s peak at 284.4 eV. The relative complex EM parameters in the 2–18 GHz frequency were measured by a microwave vector network analyzer (N5227A, Agilent technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multi-Technique Characterization of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker DRX-400 (operating at 400 MHz for 1H and 100 MHz for 13C). GC–MS spectra were recorded on an Agilent Technologies 7890B GC-system with an Agilent 5977B MSD and an HP-5MS column (0.25 mm × 30 m × 0.25 μm). High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were recorded on the Exactive Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) equipped with ESI ionization source. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data were collected with a Thermo Fisher ESCALAB Xi+ spectrometer equipped with monochromatic Al Kα radiation. IR spectra were recorded on a PerkinElmer spectrum two spectrometers using the transmittance method. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopic measurements were performed on the Bruker A300 spectrometer. Elemental analysis (EA) spectroscopic measurements were recorded on the Elemantar Vario EL cube.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Synthesis and Characterization of Ag-EGCG-CTAB Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The formation of Ag–EGCG–CTAB composites was monitored using a PerkinElmer Lambda 25 UV-Visible spectrometer in the range of 250–800 nm. The XRD (X-ray diffraction) patterns were recorded using an Ultima IV Rigaku X-ray Diffractometer at a scanning rate of 4° min−1 and a 2θ value ranging from 5° to 90°. TEM (transmission electron microscope) images were obtained using a JEOL JEM 2100 operating at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. XPS (X-ray Photoelectron Spectra) were recorded using a Thermo-Scientific ESCALAB Xi+ spectrometer with a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray Source at 1486.6 eV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!