The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Em cpd3000

Manufactured by Leica
Sourced in Germany

The EM CPD3000 is a critical point dryer designed for the preparation of biological samples for electron microscopy. It uses a controlled temperature and pressure process to replace the liquid in the sample with a gas, preserving the sample's structure without damage.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using em cpd3000

1

SEM Sample Preparation of Cultured Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For observation of the cells under SEM, the cells were first fixed after 6 h seeding on the PDMS platform, which was described in ‘Immunofluorescence staining and confocal imaging’ section. The cells were rinsed with PBS at 37°C, followed by fixation with 4% PFA for 15 min. After thoroughly rinsing with PBS, the PDMS platforms were dehydrated through an ascending concentration of ethanols (30, 50, 70, 80, 90, 95, and 100%). To reduce the artifacts created by surface tension, the cells were supercritically dried using a critical point dryer (EM CPD3000, Leica, Hesse, Germany). The PDMS platforms were then sputter-coated with gold.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Scanning Electron Microscopy of 2d Compound on T. rubrum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To investigate the effect of 2d compound on T. rubrum CBS cells, scanning electron microscopy was applied. The healthy volunteer nails were cut into small pieces of 2.5 × 3.5 mm2 and sterilized at 121 °C for 15 min. The sterilized nail fragments were exposed to a spore suspension containing 2–5 × 105 CFU/mL for 2 h at 28 °C. The nails were then removed from the spore suspension and placed in a 24-well plate containing MM-Cove medium86 . 2d solution was added at concentrations 0.5 × MIC (16 mg/L), 1 × MIC (32 mg/L), and 2 × MIC (64 mg/L). After 24 h of exposure to 2d, the nail fragments were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and dehydrated in a graded ethanol series. Then, the samples were placed into a critical point dryer (Leica EM CPD 3000) and were coated with ionized gold (Leica EM ACE 200). The nail fragments were observed in the Phenom ProX Scanning Electron Microscope belonging to the Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, University of Lodz. The SEM method was carried out following relevant guidelines and regulations. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee (the Local Ethics Committee in Lodz, Poland). Written informed consent was obtained from the volunteer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cellular Morphology Characterization via Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cell samples cultured to specific time points were extracted and fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde. Subsequently, they underwent three rounds of PBS cleaning and visualized using a confocal laser microscope (HR Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope, Nikon, A1). The Z‐stack imaging covered a range from 0 to 1000 µm, with intervals of 10 µm. The fixed sample was also subjected to a gradient alcohol dehydration process followed by treatment with a critical point dryer (Leica, EM CPD3000) to obtain a wholly dried sample. Subsequently, the dried samples were subjected to sputtering techniques, and the cellular morphology of each sample was examined using scanning electron microscopy at a 5 kV acceleration voltage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Tissue ECM Hydrogel Microstructure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface microstructure of tissue ECM hydrogels was assessed using SEM (N = 6/group). Hydrogels were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution (Cat# A17876.AE) (in 1x PBS) for 15 min and washed in ultrapure water. Following this, the hydrogels were dehydrated serially using ethanol (20%, 50%, 75%, 90%, and 100%) for 15 min at each concentration. Hydrogels were then submerged in 100% ethanol for 1 h and exposed to critical point drying (Leica EM CPD3000, Wetzlar, Germany). The dried hydrogels were placed on stubs, sputter coated with gold for 60 s, and imaged using SEM (Joel JSM-6380LV).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Visualizing Cell Morphology via SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To observe cell morphology, cells were fixed on PDMS platforms and observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). After confocal imaging for 6 h, the cell culture dish was opened and top micropost layer was separated from the bottom layer. Cells were rinsed with 37 °C PBS and fixed in 4% (w/v) 37 °C paraformaldehyde (PFA, Sigma-Aldrich, WI, USA) in PBS for 15 min at room temperature. After washing the excessive PFA thoroughly with PBS three times, the PBS in the PDMS platforms was replaced by an ascending concentration of series of ethanol (30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, and 100%). To reduce the artifacts created by surface tension, the cells were supercritically dried using critical point dryer (EM CPD3000, Leica, Hesse, Germany). A thin layer of gold was coated on the platforms to avoid charging. A field emission SEM (SU5000 FE-SEM, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) was used to image the coated samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Pollen Size and Viability Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anthers were collected from mature buds and no distinction was made between the two whorls of anthers. Material for scanning electron microscopy was washed in 70% ethanol for 20 minutes and washed twice with 100% DMM (dimethoxymethane) for 20 minutes while being sonicated each time for a couple of seconds. Then it was washed with 100% acetone. The material was critical point dried using liquid CO2 with a Leica EMCPD3000 critical point dryer. The dried samples were mounted on aluminum stubs using carbon adhesive tape and coated with a platinum palladium mix with a Cressington JFC-2300/208HR sputter coater. SEM images were obtained with a JEOL JSM7100F field emission scanning electron microscope. Pollen size was measured on 200 grains for each parent and for the hybrid. The diameter of the roughly spherical pollen was measured horizontally on the photograph regardless of orientation of the pollen grain. Pollen viability was measured using the staining protocol of Peterson et al. (2010) (link). Viability was evaluated by counting the proportion of stained versus unstained pollen grains. More than 100 grains were counted per flower for a total of three flowers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!