The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using nexsa spectrometer

1

Comprehensive Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The structure and morphology of the samples were characterised by a wide range of analytical techniques. The size and microstructure of samples were studied by transmission electron microscope (FEI Titan Themis 300: X-FEG 300 kV S/TEM). A software ‘ImageJ (1.46r)’ was used to measure the particle size from TEM images. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was used to analyse the surface elemental composition on a Thermo Scientific NEXSA spectrometer. Samples were analysed using a micro focused monochromatic Al X-ray source (72 W) over an area of approximately 400 µm. Data were recorded at pass energies of 200 eV for survey scans and 50 eV for high resolution scan with 1 eV and 0.1 eV step sizes, respectively. Raman spectra were obtained through a Renishaw plus Raman spectrometer using 532 nm laser excitation. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were recorded on a Bio-Rad FTIR spectrometer (Cary 630 FTIR, Agilent Technologies) using Diamond ATR.KBr tip. The pH of the samples was monitored with the help of pH meter (Mettler Toledo, FiveEasy pH meter). The absorption and fluorescence spectra were recorded on Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrophotometer and Shimadzu RF-6000 spectrofluorophotometer, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

XPS Analysis of Cerium Oxidation States

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The measurement was performed on a Thermo Fisher Scientific NEXSA spectrometer. The samples were analysed using a micro-focused monochromatic Al X-ray source (72 W) over an area of approximately 400 microns. Data were recorded at the pass energies of 200 eV for survey scans (1.0 eV step) and 50 eV for the high-resolution scans (0.1 eV step). Charge neutralisation of the sample was achieved using a combination of both low energy electrons and argon ions. C 1s electron at 284.8 eV was used as the standard reference to calibrate the photoelectron energy shift. XPS spectra in Ce 3d region from 840 to 940 eV was collected and fitted to identify the ratio of Ce in different oxidation states. Data analysis were performed on the CasaXPS software (version: 2.3.18PR1.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was carried out using a Nexsa spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Sunnyvale, USA) equipped with a monochromatic, micro-focused, low-power Al Ka X-ray source (photon energy: 1486.6 eV). High-resolution spectra were acquired at a pass energy of 50 eV. The source power was typically 72 W. The measurements had been carried out under ultra-high-vacuum conditions, at a base pressure of 5 × 10−10 torr (and no higher than 3 × 10−9 torr). The obtained spectra were analyzed and deconvoluted using Vision software (Kratos). Overlapping signals were analyzed after deconvolution into Gaussian/Lorentzian-shaped components.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of GST-CuNCs by Spectroscopic Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All fluorescence spectra were monitored using an RF-5301 PC spectrofluorometer (Shimadzu, Japan). UV-vis absorption spectra were recorded on a UV1800 spectrometer (Jinghua Instruments, Shanghai, China). A Thermo Fisher Nexsa spectrometer was employed to obtain X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra. The infrared spectrum was characterized using a Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The relative quantum yield (QY) of GST-CuNCs was measured and calculated using the UV-vis absorption and fluorescence spectra of quinine sulfate (QY = 54%) based on the previously reported literature.30 (link) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the products were obtained on a JEOL JEM-2100PLUS (Jeol Ltd, Japan). Time resolved fluorescence lifetime experiments were conducted using an FLS 1000 (Edinburgh Instruments, United Kingdom) combined with a fluorescence life-time and steady state spectrometer (F7100, Hitachi, Hamamatsu device).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy for Surface Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XPS measurements for surface elemental analysis of the films were conducted using a Nexsa spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Manchester, UK) equipped with a monochromatic micro-focused low-power Al Kα X-ray source (photon energy 1486.6 eV). Survey and high-resolution spectra were acquired at pass energies of 200 and 50 eV, respectively. The source power was normally 72 W. The binding energies of all elements were recalibrated by setting the CC/CH component of the C 1 s peak to 285 eV unless otherwise specified. Quantitative surface chemical analysis was performed using high resolution core-level spectra after removal of a nonlinear smart background. Measurements were carried out under UHV conditions at a base pressure of 5 × 10 -10 torr (no higher than 3 × 10 -9 torr). Spectra were analyzed and deconvoluted using Vision 2 Software (Kratos, Manchester, UK). Overlapping signals were analyzed after deconvolution into Gaussian/Lorenzian-shaped components.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Characterization of GDEs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis was conducted on a Jeol 7000F SEM. A TM3030Plus SEM was used for the cross-sectional analysis and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) mapping. A Thermo Scientific TM Talos F200X (S)TEM with an accelerating voltage 200 kV was used for all transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) analysis. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was conducted on both entire GDEs (1 cm 2 ) and the CL (0.5 -1 mg scrapped off) by a Perkin Elmer Nexion 300X with plasma strength 1500 W. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was carried out with a Bruker D8 auto-sampler using a Cu X-ray source (λ = 0.15406 nm) with a step size of 0.02°. A Thermo Fisher Scientific NEXSA spectrometer with a micro-fused monochromatic Al Kα source (72 W) and a spot size 300 x 300 μm was used for X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of the GDE surface. Data analysis was performed with the Casa XPS software (version 2.3.18PR1.0) and sample charge corrected using the C1s peak at 284.8 eV as the reference point.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

XPS Characterization of Surface Compositions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XPS was performed on a Thermo Fisher Scientific NEXSA spectrometer using a microfocused monochromatic Al X-ray source (72 W) over an area of approximately 100 µm 2 . Data were recorded at pass energies of 150 eV for survey scans and 40 eV for high resolution scans with 1 eV and 0.1 eV step sizes, respectively. Charge neutralization of the sample was achieved using a combination of both Ar + ions and low energy electrons. The XPS data was analysed using CasaXPS v2.3.19 software using sensitivity factors supplied by the manufacturer with all binding energies referenced to the C (1s) peak at 284.5 eV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis for the sample was
performed on a Thermo Fisher Scientific NEXSA spectrometer at HarwellXPS.
This spectrometer was equipped with a microfocused monochromatic Al
X-ray source (72 W, 400 μm). Data were recorded at pass energies
of 50 eV for Co 2p and O 1s scans with a 0.1 eV step size. The sample
was measured under a vacuum of 10–9 mbar and at
room temperature with a charge neutralization mode. The recorded data
were analyzed by CasaXPS (version 2.3.19PR1.0).66 (link) The binding energy was calibrated using C 1s (284.8 eV).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Multifunctional Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface charge (zeta potential) of the different nanoparticles was analyzed using a Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern, England). A Perkin Elmer LAMBDA 25 spectrometer was used in detecting the ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) absorption spectra. The powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns were measured with the X’Pert-Pro MPD diffractometer (Netherlands PANalytical). The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was recorded on a Thermo Fisher Scientific Nexsa spectrometer. The morphologies and structures of different nanomaterials were characterized through a transmission electron microscope (TEM, H—7650, Hitachi, Japan). Agilent 8900 inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was used to measure the proportion of metal contents in PDA@Pt. O2 levels were detected using a dissolved oxygen meter (JPB-607A model portable dissolved oxygen meter). Illumination using an 808nm laser (Beijing Raycus Power, LWIRL808nm-30W-F). An infrared (IR) thermal image camera (FLIR E60, FLIR Systems, Inc., USA) was used to monitor the temperature changes. Confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) images were taken using ZEISS LSM 880.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

XPS Analysis of Charged Battery Electrodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electrodes were extracted from the cells at different states of charge (i.e. OCV, 0.01 V and 3 V). These were washed with dimethyl carbonate (DMC), dried under vacuum in the antechamber of an argon-filled glovebox and sealed under argon in a vial prior to measurement. Samples were analysed using a micro-focused monochromatic Al X-ray source (19.2 W) over an area of approximately 100 μm on a Thermo Fisher Scientific NEXSA spectrometer. Data were recorded at pass energies of 150 eV for survey scans and 40 eV for high-resolution scans with 1 eV and 0.1 eV step sizes respectively. Charge neutralisation of the sample was achieved using a combination of both low energy electrons and argon ions. To remove any surface contaminants, cluster cleaning was performed with 2 keV energy at 0.5 × 0.5 mm area for 60 s. Peak fitting and analysis was carried out using CASA-XPS software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!