The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using bradford assay

1

Cell-free Vaccine Production from EVs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cell‐free vaccine DEXA‐P was produced in the absence of exogenous LPS stimulation using EVs derived from the murine DC cell line DC2.4 (H‐2b) transduced with LVA‐P. In a similar manner, control vaccine DEXVEC was produced using DC2.4 cells transduced with LVVEC.
In short, DC2.4 cells transduced with LVA‐P or LVVEC were cultured for 48 h in DMEM supplemented with 10% EV‐depleted FBS; then DEXA‐P and DEXVEC were collected from the respective conditioned culture medium by sequential centrifugation (first at 500 × g for 10 min, followed by 10,000 × g for 30 min; EV‐containing supernatants were filtered through a 0.22‐μm filter; then Evs in the filtrate were pelleted by centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 1 h and resuspended in PBS). The total protein concentration of EV preparations was quantified by Bradford assay (Sangon Biotech, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Extraction of Vacuolar and Cell Wall Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extraction of vacuolar and cell wall-bound proteins from cucumber and Nicotiana benthamiana leaves essentially followed the protocol described in Link et al. [58 (link)]. Bound proteins were eluted from the resuspended cell wall fraction with 500 mM NaCl (Sangon, Shanghai, China) for 1 h at 4 °C, using an overhead shaker, followed by centrifugation at 10,000× g at 4 °C. Soluble and salt-eluted proteins (cell wall-bound fraction) were washed and concentrated by centrifugal filter (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) with 50 mM NaOAc (Sangon, Shanghai, China) buffer pH 5. Protein concentrations were determined by Bradford assay (Sangon, Shanghai, China). For total soluble carbohydrates extraction from cucumber seedlings, method as described by Wei et al. [59 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Exosome Purification from Biological Fluids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell culture medium was sequentially centrifuged at 1000 × g for 10 min, followed by 10,000 × g for 30 min. Serum was obtained from C57BL/6 wild-type mice or Sprague–Dawley rats and centrifuged at 3000 × g, 6000 × g, and 10,000 × g for 30 min sequentially to remove cell debris. The supernatant was collected and filtered with a 0.22 µm filter (Millex, USA), followed by ultracentrifugation at 100,000 × g for 1 h to pellet exosomes and further purified by sucrose density gradient centrifugation. Briefly, exosomes were layered on a linear sucrose gradient (0.65, 0.85, 1.05, 1.25, 1.45, and 1.65 M sucrose (Sigma, USA). The gradients were centrifuged for 16 h at 100,000 × g at 4 °C. Six fractions from 0.65 to 1.65 M sucrose gradients were collected and ultracentrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h at 4 °C to pellet exosomes. Exosome pellets were washed in a large volume of PBS and recovered by centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 1 h. The total protein concentration of exosomes was quantified by the Bradford assay (Sangon Biotech, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Exosome Purification via Differential Centrifugation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this study, differential centrifugation was used to purify exosomes from cell culture supernatant. Briefly, the cell culture medium was collected and centrifuged at 1000×g for 15 min to remove whole cells. The supernatant was then centrifuged at 2500×g for 15 min to remove cell debris, which was followed by centrifugation at 10,000×g for 30 min to remove debris and large vesicles. The supernatant was collected and filtered with a 0.22-μm filter (Millex, Germany), followed by ultracentrifugation at 100,000×g for 70 min to pellet exosomes. Exosome pellets were washed in a large volume of PBS and recovered by centrifugation at 100,000 g for 1 h. The total protein concentration of exosomes was quantified by the Bradford assay (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). The size distribution of the exosome sample was measured by Zetasizer Nano ZS90 (Malvern, Worcestershire, UK)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Sciatic Nerve Injury Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sciatic nerves and left L3-L5 DRGs were dissected and homogenized rapidly on ice at the time point of one week and two weeks after sciatic injury. The protein concentration of each sample was determined by Bradford assay (Sangon Biotech, China). Twenty micrograms homogenate of DRGs and 30 μg homogenate of sciatic nerves were uploaded onto 10% acrylamide gel for sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The protein was then transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. Afterward, the membranes were blocked with 5% no-fat milk solution and then incubated with mouse anti-TRPV1 (1:4000, Biosensis, USA), mouse anti-GFAP (1:2500, Novus Biologicals, USA), or rabbit anti-GAP-43 (1:5000, Bioworld, USA) overnight at 4°C. On the second day, the membranes were washed with 0.1% Tris-buffered saline and Tween 20, 3× 5 min and then incubated for 1 h in horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat antimouse IgG (1:5000, Sangon Biotech, China) or HRP-conjugated goat antirabbit IgG (1:5000, Sangon Biotech, China). Finally, the protein bands were detected after incubated in Easy See Western Blot ECL reagent (Sangon Biotech, China) and exposed onto X-ray film in dark room. Meanwhile, rabbit anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (1:5000, Bioworld, USA) was used as a loading control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Purification and Characterization of AD5 and Cyclin D1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AD5 and cyclin D1 were purified as previously described (13 (link),21 ). A spectroscopic sample of AD5 was prepared in phosphate-buffered solution (PBS) at pH 7.4. The concentration of purified AD5 and cyclin D1 was determined using a Bradford assay (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), according to the manufacturer's protocol. The anti-V5-tag antibody (cat. no. M1008-2) was purchased from Hangzhou HuaAn Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou, China). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) (cat. no. SA00001-1) was purchased from the ProteinTech Group, Inc. (Chicago, IL, USA). Bovine serum albumin (BSA) and o-phenylenediamine (OPD) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany). CuCl2 and FeCl3 were purchased from Beijing Chemical Works (Beijing, China). All other chemicals were of analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Recombinant SjE16 Protein Production

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
rSjE16 was produced by the prokaryotic expression system as previously described.16 (link) Briefly, based on the SjE16 sequence published in GenBank (FN320650.1), full-length SjE16 was acquired from S. japonicum eggs, cloned into the pET-28a (+) vector preserved in our laboratory,16 (link) and validated by restriction analysis (using Eco RI and Hind III) and sequencing. Then, pET-28a-SjE16 was constructed and transformed into Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) preserved in our laboratory,16 (link) and recombinant SjE16 soluble protein was induced by isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) in E. coli BL21 (DE3). Harvested bacterial cells underwent ultrasonic treatment and were combined with Ni-NTA His•Bind Resin (Novagen, Madison, WI, USA). Then the protein was eluted with elution buffer containing imidazole at different concentrations (50 mM, 100 mM, 250 mM, 500 mM, and 750 mM). After dialysis with elution buffer containing a low concentration of imidazole, it was dialyzed three times with phosphate-buffered saline without imidazole. After identification by western blotting, rSjE16 was treated with polymyxin B-agarose beads (Sigma) to remove endotoxins, then its concentration was determined by the Bradford assay (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The supernatant was sequentially centrifuged at 500 g for 10 min, followed by 2000 g for 30 min, and filtered with a 0.22 μm filter (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) to remove cells and cellular debris. The EXOs were isolated by ultracentrifugation at 110,000 g for 70 min at 4 °C. EXOs pellets were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and ultracentrifugated at 110,000 g for 70 min. The cell lysates were obtained by five successive cycles of freeze-thawing. Cell lysates were then followed by centrifugation at 3000 g for 30 min, and filtered with a 0.22 μm filter. The protein concentration of EXOs and cell lysates were quantified by the Bradford assay (Sangon Biotech, shanghai, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Isolation and Purification of Exosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell culture medium was sequentially centrifuged at 1000 g for 10 min, followed by 10,000 g for 30 min. The supernatant from different cells was collected and filtered with a 0.22-μm filter (Millex, Germany), followed by ultracentrifugation at 100,000 g for 1 h to pellet exosomes. Exosome pellets were washed in a large volume of PBS and recovered by centrifugation at 100,000 g for 1 h. Exosomes were further purified with sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation (Sigma, China) as previously described [14 (link)]. Exosome pellets were dissolved in PBS, and the total protein concentration of exosomes was quantified by the Bradford assay (Sangon Biotech, USA) and stored at − 80 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Schwann Cell-Derived Exosome Isolation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The resulting culture medium of Schwann cells was harvested to obtain exosomes via multiple ultracentrifugation steps. The first centrifugation was conducted at 1000×g for 10 min, while the second centrifugation was performed at 10,000×g (Beckman Optimal-100 XP, Beckman Coulter, Germany) for 30 min. Subsequently, the supernatant was collected for the third time and ultracentrifuged at 100,000×g for 1 h. After washing the SCDEs with PBS, the SCDEs were obtained after a final ultracentrifugation for 1 h at 100,000×g and been resuspended in sterile PBS for the following experiments. The total protein concentration of exosomes was quantified using a Bradford assay (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!