The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cd3 apcefluor780 ucht1

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific

CD3-APCefluor780 (UCHT1) is a fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibody that binds to the CD3 epsilon chain on the surface of T cells. It is a tool used for the identification and enumeration of T cells in flow cytometry applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using cd3 apcefluor780 ucht1

1

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry of T Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Methods have been previously reported [20 (link)]. Briefly, cryopreserved PBMCs were thawed and stained with surface antibodies against CD3-APCefluor780 (UCHT1; eBiosciences, San Diego, CA); CD4-Qdot 655 (S3.5) and CD8-Qdot 605 (3B5) (both from Life Technologies, Eugene, OR); CXCR3-APC-CD183 (1C6), CCR4 BV421-CD194 (1G1), CCR5-PE-Cy7-CD195 (2D7), CCR7-Alexa Fluor700-CD197 (150503), CD38-FITC (HB7) and HLA-DR-PE (L243) (all from BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Cells were then incubated for 30 minutes and centrifuged at 1200 rpm for 10 minutes. PBMCs were fixed with 2% formalin before analysis. Stained cells were acquired using an LSR II flow cytometer (BD Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA). Using 10-color flow cytometric analysis, we investigated T cell phenotypes classified by the markers listed above. Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (v9.8.5, TreeStar, Ashland, OR). Lymphocytes were analyzed based on forward scatter (FSC) and side scatter (SSC) profiles. A single cell population was selected with SSC-A vs. SSC-H and then with FSC-A vs. FSC-H before gating for other markers. Gates were set based on Fluorescence Minus One (FMO) control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Phenotypic Characterization of Lymphocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated using density centrifugation. PBMCs and aliquots of donor lymphocytes were analyzed immediately or cryopreserved. Thawed PBMCs were stained in MACS buffer on ice for 30 min using pre-determined concentrations of the following antibodies: CD14-Pacific Blue (M5E2), TCRα/β-AF488 (IP26), CD56-PE (HCD56), CD8-PerCP-Cy5.5 (SK1), and CD45-AF700 (HI30) from Biolegend; CD19-PE-Cy7 (HIB19), CD4-APC (SK3), and CD3-APC-eFluor780 (UCHT1) from eBioscience. After washing in MACS buffer, and addition of Sytox Blue (Invitrogen) for dead cell discrimination, cells were acquired on an LSRII (BD) flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter). Doublets, CD14+ monocytes and dead cells were excluded before a minimum of 30,000 CD45+ lymphocyte events were recorded. Data were analyzed using FacsDIVA software version 6.1.3 (BD). Lymphocyte counts, from routine clinical analysis of whole blood, were used to calculate lymphocyte subset frequency.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry for PBMC and MMC Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PBMCs and MMCs were stained with fluorescent antibodies against cell surface markers and analyzed using 10-color flow cytometry by previously reported methodology [3 (link)]. Briefly, PBMCs and MMCs were labeled with LIVE/DEAD fluorescent reactive dye (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and stained with surface antibodies against CD3-APCefluor780 (UCHT1; eBiosciences, San Diego, CA); CD4-Qdot 655 (S3.5) and CD8-Qdot 605 (3B5) (both from Life Technologies, Eugene, OR); CXCR3-APC-CD183 (1C6), CCR4 BV421-CD194 (1G1), CCR5-PE-Cy7-CD195 (2D7), CCR7-Alexa Fluor700-CD197 (150503), CD38-FITC (HB7) and HLA-DR-PE (L243) (all antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Cells were then incubated for 30 minutes and centrifuged at 1200 rpm for 10 minutes. Both PBMCs and MMCs were fixed with 2% formalin before analysis. Using an LSR II flow cytometer (BD Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA), CD3+ events were acquired from each sample. Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (v9.8.5, TreeStar, Ashland, OR). Lymphocytes analysis was based on forward and side scatter profiles after exclusion of dead cells (Fig 1). Gates were either set using negative sample or Fluorescence Minus One (FMO) control and were then applied to all samples from each participant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!