The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using genotyping console 4

1

Genome-Wide SNP Array Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were hybridized to the Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0 from Affymetrix (Santa Clara, CA, USA). The sample preparation, including DNA extraction, digestion, labelling and hybridization, was performed as directed by the manufacturer. Data were analyzed using Partek Genomics Suite v6.4 (Partek Incorporated, St. Louis, MO, and Genotyping Console 4.1 (Affymetrix), GISTIC2.0 (Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genetic Analysis of IDUA Mutation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All biological samples were obtained following written informed consent from the studied individuals legal representatives. DNA samples from whole blood were isolated by standard procedures. PCR and Sanger sequencing of the IDUA gene (GenBank database accession number NM_000203.4) was performed in the index patient as described previously [23 (link)]. Consecutively, segregation analysis for the familial variant was performed on DNA samples of the healthy parents. This was followed by a microsatellite analysis confirming the paternity of the father and marker analysis [27 (link)]. Consecutively, SNP array analysis was performed using the Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0 (Affymetrix) according to the manufacturer's instruction. Copy number and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) calculation was performed by the Genotyping Console 4.1 and CHAS 3.0 software (Affymetrix) Abnormalities were mapped according to Genome Build hg19.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SNP genotyping and Sanger sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SNP genotyping to confirm the NGS data was performed using an Axiom genotyping solution with an Axiom Genome-Wide ASI 1 Array Plate (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and a reagent kit according to the manufacturer's protocol. Total genomic DNA (200 ng) was used and the resulting data in the form of a DAT file was automatically saved as a CEL file. The CEL intensity file was normalized, and genotype calling was performed using Genotyping Console 4.1 (Affymetrix) with Axiom GT1 algorithms according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cutoff value for data quality control was a DISHQC ≥ 0.82 for hybridization and a QC call rate ≥ 97%.
Twenty-six SNVs, including 15 coding variations, were validated by conventional Sanger sequencing using dye-terminator chemistry. The sequences were analyzed using an automatic sequencer ABI 3730 (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The target regions were amplified by PCR followed by direct sequencing or were cloned into TA vectors. Details of the PCR and sequencing primers are provided in Supplementary Table 11.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Melanoma Genotyping with Affymetrix SNP Array

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotyping of DNA from melanoma specimens (n=78, Table S1) was performed using the Affymetrix Genome-Wide SNP 6.0 array and analyzed using Genotyping Console 4.0 (Affymetrix) as previously described (Marzese et al., 2014a (link)). More details are provided in the Supplementary Materials and Methods section.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

SNP 6.0 Array Genotyping Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA labelling, hybridization, and array scanning were performed for SNP 6.0 arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol and processed with the Affymetrix Genotyping Console 4.0 software to generate Birdseed .chp and .txt files using the Birdseed v2 algorithm with the default parameters., Model-based expression analysis was performed and imported into R for reference normalization to a diploid reference chromosome determined for each tumour, resulting in a normalized probe level summarization value and a genotype call for each individual probe58 (link). Circular binary segmentation was performed in R using the DNAcopy BioConductor package. Default parameters included nperm=10,000 (the number of permutations used for Pvalue calculation), α=0.01 (the significance level for the test to accept change points), and random seed=12,345,678 (the seed for the random number generator). This resulted in a segmented file for each tumour sample relative to the corresponding normal sample. Segments containing at least eight markers in which the log2 value was ≥+0.5 or ≤−0.5 were considered regions of gain or loss, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Melanoma Genotyping with Affymetrix SNP Array

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotyping of DNA from melanoma specimens (n=78, Table S1) was performed using the Affymetrix Genome-Wide SNP 6.0 array and analyzed using Genotyping Console 4.0 (Affymetrix) as previously described (Marzese et al., 2014a (link)). More details are provided in the Supplementary Materials and Methods section.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genome-wide SNP Typing in Narcolepsy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genome-wide SNP typing was performed in 13 orexin mutation-positive IH patients, 116 orexin mutation-negative IH patients, and 420 healthy controls using the Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0 according to the manufacturer’s protocols (Affymetrix Inc., Santa Clara, CA). Data generated by the array were analyzed with GeneChip Operating Software and Genotyping Console 4.0 (Affymetrix Inc). We included SNPs that showed genotyping call rates of >97%, MAFs of >5%, and P values of more than the threshold of the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P > 0.001), which was evaluated using the Chi-2 test. We checked unknown familial relationships between subjects in this study with PIHAT values as calculated by PLINK 1.952 (link).
When calculating PIHAT values, linkage disequilibrium-based SNP pruning was conducted (r2 < 0.5). PCA was performed using the EIGENSTRAT program53 (link) and PLINK 1.9 to evaluate population stratification or differences in genetic background among the study subjects genotyped with the SNP array. In the PCA, 45 JPT (Japanese in Tokyo, Japan), 90 CEU (Utah residents with Northern and Western European ancestry from the CEPH collection), 90 YRI (Nigeria Yoruba in Ibadan, Nigeria), and 45 CHB (Han Chinese in Beijing, China) were utilized that were derived from the International HapMap project.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genetic Linkage Analysis of Affected Family

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The five affected family members and the unaffected individual were genotyped using the Genome-wide Human SNP array 6.0 (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The genotypes of each family member were determined using the Genotyping Console 4.2 (Affymetrix). A parametric multipoint linkage analysis (autosomal dominant model with complete penetrance) was conducted using the pipeline software programs SNP-HiTLink (6 (link)) and Allegro version 2 (7 (link)), employing single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) satisfying a p value of >0.001 in the Hardy-Weinberg test, a call rate of >0.98, a genotyping confidence score of <0.02, a minor allele frequency in the controls >0, and intermarker distances of 80 to 120 kb. The candidate variants were validated by PCR followed by Sanger sequencing according to the standard protocols to confirm the genotypes. The analysis workflow is shown in Fig. 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Affymetrix SNP Typing Copy Number Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Copy number analyses were performed using the SNP typing data with Genotyping Console 4.2 (Affymetrix).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genome-wide DNA Analysis of Gastric Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNAs from gastric tumours and matched normal gastric tissues were hybridized on Affymetrix SNP6.0 arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). Data in CEL format was processed in the following order: (1) Normalization: Raw.CEL files were processed using Affymetrix Genotyping Console 4.2. Reference models were created from SNP6.0 profiles of normal gastric tissues according to the hybridization batch. Copy number changes in cell lines and primary tumour samples were determined by using the reference model from primary normal samples. (2) Segmentation: Copy number segmentation data were produced using the circular binary segmentation (CBS) algorithm implemented in the DNAcopy R package. The P-value cutoff for detecting a change-point was 0.01, with a permutation number of 10,000. Copy number gain and loss regions were defined for showing average log ratios of >0.6 and<−1.0, respectively. Illumina HumanMethylation450 (HM450) Infinium DNA methylation arrays were also used to assay DNA methylation levels. Methylation β-values were calculated and background corrected using the methylumi R BioConductor package. Normalization was performed using the BMIQ method (watermelon package in R).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!