The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Waveguard

Manufactured by ANT Neuro
Sourced in Germany, Netherlands

Waveguard is a high-quality, durable, and reliable EEG recording system developed by ANT Neuro. It is designed to provide precise and accurate data acquisition for various research and clinical applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

20 protocols using waveguard

1

Electroencephalographic Recording of Brain Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each participant was asked to relax his or her facial muscles and keep head, neck, arms, and hands as motionless as possible. Eyes should be focused on the center of the monitor to reduce the number of eye blinks during recording (cf. general guidelines of ERP measurement, Picton et al., 2001 (link)).
Brain electrical activity was recorded with Ag/AgCl electrodes using a 32-channel electrode cap (waveguardTM) as well as Advanced Source Analysis (ASATM, version 4.73) as recording software (both ANT-Neuro, Netherlands). Channel activity was referenced to the left mastoid (M1), and a position between FPz and Fz was used for the ground electrode. EEG signals were digitized with a sampling rate of 625 Hz during recording. In addition, ocular artifacts were registered with vertical and horizontal electrooculography (EOG) electrodes set above and below the right eye and at the outer canthi of both eyes, respectively. The impedance at each channel was kept below 10 kΩ. Tapping responses (button press) were also registered during recording.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multi-modal neuroimaging of healthy subject

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Structural MRI scans were collected from one healthy young subject at Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital. The subject gave written informed consent, and the study protocol was approved by the Massachusetts General Hospital Human Research Committee. Brain structural anatomical details were obtained from a T1-weighted multi-echo sequence (MEMPRAGE, TR/TE/TI = 2530/1.64/1200 ms, 7° flip angle, 1.0 × 1.0 × 1.0 mm3 voxel resolution) and a fast low-angle shot gradient echo sequence (FLASH, TR/TE = 20/1.85 ms, 5° flip angle, 1.3 mm sagittal slice thickness, 1.3 × 1.0 mm2 in-plane resolution) using a 12-channel RF receive coil array on a 3T Siemens TrioTM MR scanner. An equidistant 128-channel montage (WaveguardTM, ANT Neuro, The Netherlands) was used for EEG electrode placement, and electrode positions were digitized using the Polhemus FastSCAN II laser scanner, aligned to the subject’s structural MRI based on fiducial points (nasion and preauricular points) using the iterative closest point algorithm, and projected onto the scalp surface.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Toddler and Adult Cortical Activity Comparison

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Toddlers and adults wore a 32-channel and 64-channel EEG cap (WaveGuardTM, ANT-Neuro, Enschede, the Netherlands; and TMSi REFA, TMSi Twente, the Netherlands, respectively) to record electrical cortical activity. For toddlers, the EEG cap was pre-gelled before mounting it on the head. After placement, with the help of a blunt plastic little stick we distributed the impedance gel (SonoGel, Bad Camberg, Germany) homogeneously and, if required, we injected additional gel to improve the impedance between the skin and electrode. In adults, the EEG cap was aligned to the fiducials. We injected impedance gel in every channel to lower the impedance. Toddler and adult nylon EEG caps with sintered electrodes were mounted in accordance with the international 10–20 system. EEG data were sampled at a frequency of 2,048 Hz (eegoTM mylab, ANT B.V., Enschede, the Netherlands). Reference and ground electrodes were mounted on channel CPz and AFz, respectively. To compare the cortical activity of toddlers and adults, the 64-channel configuration of adults was reduced to match the 32 channels of toddlers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Continuous EEG Acquisition Across Multiple Tasks

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous EEG data were collected using a compact 32-channel system (eego™sports 32, ANT Neuro®, Enschede, The Netherlands). A gel-based electrode cap with sintered Ag/AgCl electrodes was used (Waveguard, ANT Neuro®, 10–20 system). The online reference was placed at the CPz electrode. Signal was acquired with eego sports acquisition software connected to a 24 bits amplifier at a sampling rate of 500 Hz. Impedances for all electrodes were kept below 20 kΩ. EEG signals were recorded across 30 channels: Fp1, Fpz, Fp2, F7, F3, Fz, F4, F8, FC5, FC1, FC2, FC6, T7, C3, Cz, C4, T8, CP5, CP1, CP2, CP6, P7, P3, Pz, P4, P8, POz, O1, Oz, and O2 excluding the mastoids electrodes (M1 and M2). The starting and ending points of each block composing the acquisition (Rest, Task 1, Task 2, Task 3) were manually labeled using the acquisition software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Eyes-Closed Resting-State EEG Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eyes-closed resting-state EEGs were recorded using an EEG-1200 Nihon Kohden (Neurofax 1200, Tokyo, Japan) system. We used 30 Ag/AgCl sintered ring electrodes (Waveguard; ANT-Neuro, Enschede, Netherlands). Data were sampled at 500 Hz, and recorded with a low-pass filter at 0·5 Hz and a high-pass filter at 60 Hz. The recordings lasted 5 min and were carried out twice for each participant.
For processing, raw EEG data were bandpass filtered at 1–30 Hz. EEG fragments contaminated with muscle artifacts and eye blink noise were excluded by visual inspection. After removing the contaminated fragments, we used an artifact detector in LORETA-KEY software (http://www.uzh.ch/keyinst/loreta.htm) 30 (link) and distinguished possible artifacts autonomously. We adopted 2-min epochs with as few artifacts as possible in each session.
Current densities were calculated from the EEG data using standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA)30 (link). The region of interest (ROI) for the rACC (x = 0, y = 45, z = 0 in the Montreal Neurological Institute space) was selected based on a previous study investigating neurophysiological mechanisms in patients with MDD22 . The ROI for the DLPFC is defined by the location under the stimulation site, based on the 10–10 EEG coordinates (x = –52, y = 26, z = 28)31 (link). We analysed the alpha band between 8.5 and 13 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Streamlined EEG Setup for BCI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The general experimental procedure for each subject is depicted in Fig. 3. Subjects were first fitted with and EEG cap (Waveguard, ANT-Neuro, Germany) with 64 actively-shielded electrodes. Only a subset of 33 electrodes was used (see Fig. 4), and their impedances were reduced to <10 kΩ using conductive gel. The conventional BCI utilized 32 channels (32 electrodes all referenced to AFz), while the custom BCI used only 4 channels (C1, C3, C5, and CP3, all referenced to AFz). Specifically, AFz was the V- electrode in Fig. 2 for every channel of the custom BCI. In addition, the custom BCI used a bias electrode (Fz) during testing. For subject S3, FC3 was used instead of C5 due to excessive noise in that channel. The 4 channels used by the custom BCI were chosen based on their proximity to the expected hand representation area of the primary motor cortex. Although the custom BCI could accommodate up to 8 channels, preliminary post-hoc analysis of foot movement data from a previous BCI study [17 (link)] demonstrated no significant loss of decoding accuracy when only ~4 (albeit well chosen) EEG channels were used instead of all 32. In addition, our results from [13 ] suggested that high decoding performance was attainable with only 4 EEG channels. Therefore, we used only 4 of the 8 channels for this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Newborn EEG Data Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EEG data were recorded with a NicOne EEG amplifier (Cardinal Healthcare/Natus, USA) or a Cognitrace amplifier (ANT B.V., Enschede, The Netherlands). EEG caps (sintered Ag/AgCl electrodes; Waveguard, ANT-Neuro, Germany) had 19 or 28 scalp electrodes positioned according to the International 10–20 standard. The same 19 EEG channels (Fp1, Fp2, F7, F3, Fz, F4, F8, T7, C3, Cz, C4, T8, P7, P3, Pz, P4, P8, O1, O2) across all recordings were selected for analyses. Further details regarding EEG acquisition in newborns can be found elsewhere38 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

High-Density EEG Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EEG was acquired from 64 scalp positions using NeurOne amplifiers (NeurOne Tesla, Mega Electronics Ltd, Kuopio, Finland) with a 24-bit-resolution, Input Impedance >1 GΩ and a 128-channels wet-gel electrode EEG cap (WaveGuard, ANT Neuro, Hengelo, Netherlands). The 64 scalp positions followed the 10–20 system. The Ag/AgCl electrodes were filled with conductive electrode gel, using a blunt needle to abrase superficial layers of the skin, i.e., stratum corneum. Cz was the reference electrode. The ground electrode was localized between Fz and AFz. The signal was sampled at 5,000 Hz. An anti-aliasing hardware filter was applied at 1,250 Hz. The amplifier was localized in a distance of 3 m and powered through a battery pack. The subjects’ scalp below the electrodes was treated to obtain impedance values below 5 kΩ. Therefore, subjects were instructed to wash their hair thoroughly before the experiment. For all subjects, the mean number of electrodes with impedances between 5 and 10 kΩ was 6 electrodes, maximum 14 electrodes, minimum 0 electrodes. Average impedance of these “high impedance” channels (impedance >5 kΩ) was at 5.7 kΩ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

High-Density EEG and Motion Capture Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High‐density EEG data were acquired using 126‐channel Ag‐AgCl electrodes embedded in an electrode cap (WaveGuard; ANT Neuro, Hengelo, the Netherlands), with electrode distribution according to the 5% electrode system.19 The ground electrode was placed on the left mastoid. EEG was sampled at 2,048Hz using a biosignal amplifier (REFA; TMSi, Oldenzaal, the Netherlands) with a built‐in antialiasing low‐pass filter (552Hz) and average reference. Electrode impedance was ≤10kΩ.
Movement data were acquired using a 10‐camera 3‐dimensional motion capture system (Vicon, Oxford, UK), with a sampling rate of 100Hz. Thirty‐five reflective markers were placed on anatomical landmarks as defined by the PlugInGait Full Body Model,20 excluding the head markers for EEG purposes. In addition to the trigger line for external cueing and action observation, a digital trigger signal was simultaneously recoded by the EEG and motion capture systems for data synchronization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Neonatal EEG Acquisition and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scalp EEG was measured at conceptional age of 42.1 ± 0.9 weeks in AED and 42.2 ± 0.9 weeks in HC groups (or 2.0 ± 1.0 and 2.0 ± 1.1 weeks from birth, respectively; mean ± SD for all) with no significant difference (P = 0.51, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). The EEG recording was performed during daytime sleep with a NicOne EEG amplifier (Cardinal Healthcare/Natus, USA), using initial sampling frequency (Fs) of 250 Hz or 500 Hz. The neonatal Waveguard caps had 20–32 sintered Ag/AgCl electrodes (ANT-Neuro, Germany) placed according to the 10–20 international system. For further analysis, the same 19 channels were selected from all subjects: Fp1, Fp2, F7, F3, Fz, F4, F8, T7, C3, Cz, C4, T8, P7, P3, Pz, P4, P8, O1, and O2.
EEG epochs for the network analyses were selected from both neonatal sleep (vigilance) states, AS and QS. They were identified visually using the standard combination of electrophysiological and behavioral measures (André et al. 2010 (link)), including polygraphic channels (submental electromyogram, electrocardiogram, electrooculogram, and respiration sensor). EEG signal during AS is known to exhibit continuous fluctuations, while polygraphic channels show irregular respiration and occasional eye movements. Conversely, EEG signal during QS is characteristically discontinuous, while respiration is markedly regular.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!