The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Acurate neo

Manufactured by Boston Scientific
Sourced in United States

The ACURATE neo is a medical device designed for the implantation of aortic valve prostheses. It is used in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures. The device is intended to assist in the placement and deployment of the valve prosthesis within the patient's native aortic valve.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using acurate neo

1

ACURATE neo Valve Implantation in High-Risk Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The bench-models were derived from a real cohort of consecutive patients who underwent ACURATE neo (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) valve implantation to treat degenerated SBV across three high-volume European centres between February 2018 and February 2020. All patients were deemed high-surgical risk for re-do SAVR following local heart team discussion. All procedures were performed from transfemoral access and choice of valve sizing and implantation technique was left to the operator’s discretion. Ethical approval for this study was obtained in accordance to the local policy of each institution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

TAVR Conduction Disturbances Impact

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We analyzed the data from patients collected in the prospective Swiss TAVR registry (NCT01368250) for the period from August 2014 to August 2020, treated at our institution. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients and the study was approved by the local ethics committee.
Patients included in the present analysis were those with pre-existing or new-onset LBBB after TAVR. The clinical and procedural characteristics were obtained from the electronic patient medical records. Exclusion criteria were TAVR performed through other than transfemoral implantation route, valve-in-valve implantation, previous PPI, and HAVB after TAVR requiring PPI, and missing electrophysiological (EP) measurement of the HV interval. Valve types included in our study were self‐expandable Evolut R and Evolut R Pro (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN), Portico (St. Jude Medical, St Paul, MN), Acurate NEO (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA), balloon‐expandable Sapien 3 (Edwards Life Science, Irvine, CA), or mechanically expandable Lotus and Lotus Edge (Boston Scientific Inc., Marlborough, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

ACURATE neo and neo2 TAVR Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this retrospective analysis, patients with severe native aortic stenosis who underwent transfemoral TAVR with the ACURATE neo (n = 464) or ACURATE neo2 (n = 191) valve (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) at two German high-volume centers (Kerckhoff Heart Center, Bad Nauheim; St. Johannes Hospital, Dortmund, Germany) between June 2012 and December 2021 were included. The valve design and the implantation technique have been described previously [6 (link),7 (link)]. Baseline characteristics such as comorbidities, risk scores, echocardiography, MDCT and cardiac catheterization data were prospectively recorded in a dedicated database, as were procedural data and complications from each participating center. The pooling and review of all data was led by a single investigator, and discrepancies were resolved through direct communication with both centers. Follow-up data were collected at outpatient visits, from recent medical reports or by telephone interview. The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Acurate neo Transcatheter Heart Valve

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Boston Scientific Acurate neo (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) THV has a SE nitinol frame carrying porcine pericardial leaflets in a supraannular position (Figure 1). The most important difference to other self-expanding platforms is the top-down deployment with minimal protrusion of the stent toward the left ventricular outflow tract. In addition, supraannular leaflet function provides very low gradients even in small anatomies (17 (link)) and the pericardial skirt in the new generation neo 2 design seals effectively against PVL. The transfemoral delivery system has a 18Fr outer diameter shaft. In detail, first the upper crown is opened, which guarantees stable positioning and supraannular anchoring of the valve. Then the flexible stabilization arches are opened, responsible for the self-aligning properties of the valve, thereby ensuring coaxial alignment. Finally, in step two the lower crown is deployed anchoring the device inside the annulus. The THV is available in three sizes for aortic annulus sizes from 20.0 to 26.3 mm and are labeled small (S: for aortic annulus sizes 20.0–22.4 mm), medium (M: for aortic annulus sizes 22.5–24.3 mm) and large (L: for aortic annulus sizes 24.4–26.3 mm) (16 (link), 18 (link)) in AS patients.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

TAVI Patients with LBBB Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this prospective study, all patients undergoing TAVI were screened for LBBB. Patients with both, new‐onset LBBB after TAVI and pre‐existing LBBB before TAVI were included in the analysis. Exclusion criteria for the analysis were pre‐existing high‐grade atrioventricular block or high‐grade atrioventricular‐block directly after TAVI requiring pacemaker implantation, a previously implanted pacemaker, and a nontransfemoral implantation route.
The self‐expandable Evolut R and Evolut R Pro (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN), Portico (St. Jude Medical, St Paul, MN), and the Acurate NEO (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA), the balloon‐expandable Sapien 3 (Edwards Life Science, Irvine, CA), or the mechanically expandable Lotus (Boston Scientific Inc., Marlborough, MA) were used. Informed consent was obtained from all patients and the study was approved by the local ethics committee for Northwest/Central Switzerland. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comparison of TAVI Valve Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We conducted a single-centre, retrospective, observational study comparing the outcomes of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) who underwent TAVI with mechanically expandable intra-annular Lotus and Lotus Edge (Boston Scientific, USA) versus self-expandable supra-annular Evolut R (Medtronic, USA) and Acurate Neo (Boston Scientific, USA) transcatheter valves.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Transfemoral TAVI with ACURATE Prostheses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Consecutive patients with symptomatic severe native aortic stenosis who underwent transfemoral TAVI between May 2012 and July 2022 using the ACURATE neo (n = 2055) or ACURATE neo2 (n = 955) prosthesis (Boston Scientific, Ecublens, Switzerland) were retrospectively included from two high-volume German centers (Kerckhoff Heart Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany; St. Johannes Hospital, Dortmund, Germany). The design and implantation technique of this transcatheter heart valve design have been described previously [5 (link),6 (link)]. Baseline characteristics such as risk scores, comorbidities, MDCT (multidetector computed tomography), echocardiography, and cardiac catheterization data were recorded prospectively in a dedicated database as well as procedural data and complications from each participating center. Follow-up data were collected from recent medical reports, at outpatient visits, or by telephone interview. This study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Due to its retrospective nature and anonymous data processing, ethical approval was waived by the respective local ethics committees.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Transfemoral TAVI Outcomes Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data of all patients who underwent transfemoral TAVI between 2014 and 2019 were extracted from the database of GARY which is a nationwide multicenter all-comers registry. The registry design has been previously published [12 (link)]. Prostheses studied in this analysis included the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) and the self-expanding Acurate neo™ (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA), Evolut™ R (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and Portico (Abbott). Prostheses selection was at the discretion of the operating physician.
Transvalvular gradients and paravalvular leakage were assessed pre-discharge by transthoracic echocardiography. Procedural data, procedural success and severe intraprocedural complications were analyzed.
Patients were followed-up at 30 days and one year regarding adverse clinical events and NYHA classification by phone interviews. One-year follow-up was not available in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI in 2016 and 2017. The primary outcome was the mortality rate at one year.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Coronary Access Feasibility in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
THVs used were the intra‐annular Sapien 3 and Ultra (Edwards Lifesciences), the supra‐annular Evolut R and Pro (Medtronic), and the Acurate Neo (Boston Scientific). The RP was defined, according to manufacturer's instruction, as the level under which the stent frame of the first THV would be covered after its leaflets were displaced vertically with the implantation of a second TAVR device (Figure 1A).11, 12Intra‐annular balloon‐expandable Edwards Sapien 3 and Ultra have a low frame height (15.5–22.5 mm, according to valve size) and an upper row of open cells, where commissural posts are located. Accordingly, the RP is found ≈1 mm below the upper part of the prosthesis frame.
The frame of the supra‐annular self‐expanding Evolut R and Pro extends beyond the coronary ostia jailing the coronary sinuses and has a constrained central portion. CA is possible through the prosthesis frame cells. Importantly, the height of commissural posts, and thus of the RP, is 26 mm from the bottom part of the THV.
The supra‐annular self‐expanding Acurate Neo valve has a commissural post height (and thus an RP) of 28 to 31 mm according to valve size but carries an open cell architecture in the upper part of the frame that allows easier access to the coronary ostia.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

TAVR with Acurate Neo/Neo 2 THV

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Starting from June 2020 up to November 2020, 45 consecutive patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR with Acurate Neo or Acurate Neo 2 THV (Boston Scientific) at I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Donato (Milan, Italy) were prospectively enrolled in the study. Consensus to proceed with TAVR was reached after Heart Team discussion and all patients provided written informed consents for participating in the study. Transfemoral TAVR was performed in all cases, under local anesthesia and mild sedation if needed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!