The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

439 protocols using volocity

1

3D Microscopic Tissue Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For 3D analysis of tissue sections by conventional microscopy, slides were imaged with a Hamamatsu Orca AG CCD camera (Hamamatsu Photonics), Zeiss Axioplan II fluorescence microscope with Plan-neofluar or Plan apochromat objectives, a Lumen 200 W metal halide light source (Prior Scientific Instruments) and Chroma #89014ET single excitation and emission filters (Chroma Technology Corporation) with the excitation and emission filters installed in Prior motorised filter wheels. A piezoelectrically driven objective mount (PIFOC model P-721, Physik Instrumente & Co, Karlsruhe) was used to control movement in the z dimension. Hardware control, image capture and analysis were performed using Volocity (PerkinElmer). Images were deconvolved using a calculated point spread function with the constrained iterative algorithm of Volocity (PerkinElmer). Image analysis was carried out using the Quantitation module of Volocity (PerkinElmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Lymphatic Vessel Parameters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To quantify EdU+ cells/mm2 SMC surface area, pictures of complete lymphatic collecting vessels were created using manual alignment (Adobe Photoshop) of individual high resolution images. Cells double positive for EdU and α-SMA were manually counted and SMC surface area of a complete collecting vessel was measured using Volocity (Perkin Elmer). To quantify collecting vessel width and SMC coverage, regions with excessive branches and intersecting blood vessels were excluded and vessel width was measured along the vessel and averaged by number of measurements. SMC coverage was quantified using Volocity (Perkin Elmer) (dermal ear skin, popliteal lymphatic vessels) or FIJI (Schindelin et al., 2012 (link)) (mesenteric lymphatic vessels) and indicated as percentage of vessel area covered by SMC areas. ‘Capillary density’ was measured using Volocity as area of capillaries in the complete region of interest. Branch points/mm2 lymphatic capillaries within a defined region of interest were measured using ImageJ. Lymphatic vessel contraction was analysed in Volocity (Perkin Elmer) and plotted as vessel area against time in GraphPad Prism5 (GraphPad Software).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative 3D Co-localization Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative co-localization analysis in 3 dimensions was performed between the phalloidin and anti-FLAG channels. Co-localized voxels were identified by performing co-localization analysis in Volocity (Perkin-Elmer) and generating a channel that displays the product of the differences of the mean (PDM). PDM channels were generated by calculating the product of the difference from the mean for each voxel intensity from the two channels analyzed. This gave a clear visual display of areas of positive (and negative) correlation. The total volume of co-localized voxels per cell was calculated in Volocity (Perkin-Elmer) using 8 cells for each of the 6 transfections performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Visualizing Intracellular Calcium Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa cells stably expressing mitochondria-targeted R-GECO1.2 (mito-R-GECO1.2), which acts as mitochondria Ca2+ sensor and emits red fluorescence, or cyto-GCaMP6s, which acts as cytosol Ca2+ sensor and emits green fluorescence, were used for the Ca2+ imaging experiments. Ca2+ imaging was performed with a spinning-disk UltraVIEW VoX imaging system (Perkin Elmer) equipped with a 20 × /0.75 NA objective lens (Nikon).
For histamine-induced Ca2+ dynamics, cells were washed twice with Hank’s balanced salt solution, followed by the addition of Ca2+ buffer (150 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 20 mM HEPES, 10 mM glucose, 1 mM MgSO4, and 1.8 mM CaCl2, pH 7.4), immediately before imaging. Cells were excited at either 561 nm (for mitochondria Ca2+) or 488 nm (for cytosol Ca2+), and images were acquired every 5 s for 5 min. Approximately 30 s after the start of the experiment, histamine was added at a final concentration of 100 μM. Images were post-processed with Volocity (Perkin Elmer).
For mitochondria Ca2+ upon DNA damage, cells were treated with 1 μM cpt for 10 h before imaging. Images were acquired at 30 points randomly, and post-processed and analyzed with Volocity (Perkin Elmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microscopic Imaging and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Live animals and whole-mount in situ hybridization samples were photographed using a microscope (SteREO Discovery.V20; Carl Zeiss) equipped with a Plan Apochromat 1.0× objective and a digital microscope camera (AxioCam HRc; Carl Zeiss) automated by AxioVision Rel.4.8 software (Carl Zeiss). Confocal images were captured on a Leica SP5 confocal microscope with a 20×, 40×, or 63× objective. All the quantifications were using the Measurement program of Volocity (Perkin Elmer) and normalized by the quantified animal area. For H3P quantifications, all the mitotic events were determined by counting nuclei labeled with the anti-H3P antibody. For quantification of notum+, wnt1+ or fst+ cells, all the probe signals surrounding the nucleus in the vicinity of the wounds were calculated. For cells under apoptosis quantifications, we obtained all the TUNEL signal using confocal microscope (about fifty 1 μm stacks), then we used Volocity software (PerkinElmer) to build 3D image for these stacks and quantify TUNEL+ nuclei in our region of interest (ROI), and finally the number of TUNEL+ nuclei was normalized by the area of the upper surface of ROI.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of Neuronal and Glial Changes in Neuropathic Pain Models

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serial sections of entire L4/5 DRGs from 4 to 7 animals were cut (14 μm) and placed on Superfrost microslides. For quantitative analysis, 4 to 7 sections from each DRG were used for ATF-3 and NeuN immunoreactive quantification. The number of NeuN+ and ATF3+ neurons was counted in the L4/5 DRGs for sham, NP, SNI, and CCI animals.
F4/80 immunofluorescence intensity in sciatic nerves was quantified by PerkinElmer Volocity software (version 6.5.1). Each group consisted of 4 to 9 mice, and 5 to 10 sections per mouse were quantified. F4/80 immunofluorescence intensity across sections with background subtracted was averaged to produce a final intensity for each animal.
Transverse sections (14 μm) of sciatic nerve were prepared from 4 mice per group, and the diameter of the sciatic nerve was measured using PerkinElmer Volocity software (version 6.5.1). Three measurements were collected and averaged across sections to produce a final average diameter for each animal.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying HP1a Accumulation at Satellite Repeats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Embryo microinjections were performed as described in Farrell et al. (2012) (link). JabbaTrap and Cdc25 (twine) mRNAs were synthesized using the CellScript T7 mRNA production system and injected at a concentration of 600 ng/µL. dsRNA against the cyclins A, B, and B3 was prepared as described in McCleland and O'Farrell (2008) (link). Imaging was performed using a spinning-disk confocal microscope as described in Seller and O'Farrell (2018) (link). Image processing and analysis were done using Volocity (PerkinElmer) and ImageJ. When quantifying the accumulation of HP1a at a TALE-light-labeled satellite repeat, a Volocity protocol (described in Supplemental Fig. S3A) was used to first identify the region of the nucleus labeled by the TALE-light probe. The mean intensity from the HP1a channel in this region was calculated for each time point. After setting the intensity at the beginning of interphase 14 as zero, the mean intensity of HP1a at the repeat was graphed over time. Unless noted otherwise, all images are presented as Z-stack projections.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fluorescence Microscopy for DNA FISH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Slides were imaged using a Photometrics Coolsnap HQ2 CCD camera and a Zeiss AxioImager A1 fluorescence microscope with a Plan Apochromat 100x 1.4NA objective, a Nikon Intensilight Mercury based light source (Nikon UK Ltd, Kingston-on-Thames, UK) and either Chroma #89014ET (3 colour) or #89000ET (4 colour) single excitation and emission filters (Chroma Technology Corp., Rockingham, VT) with the excitation and emission filters installed in Prior motorised filter wheels. A piezoelectrically driven objective mount (PIFOC model P-721, Physik Instrumente GmbH & Co, Karlsruhe) was used to control movement in the z dimension. Step size for z stacks was set at 0.2 μm. Hardware control, image capture and analysis were performed using Nikon Nis-Elements software (Nikon UK Ltd, Kingston-on-Thames, UK). Images were deconvolved using a calculated point spread function with the constrained iterative algorithm of Volocity (Perkinelmer Inc, Waltham, MA). Image analysis was carried out using the Quantitation module of Volocity (Perkinelmer Inc, Waltham, MA). For DNA FISH, only alleles with single probe signals were analysed to eliminate the possibility of measuring sister chromatids.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Smc6-3×HA Localization on Mitotic Chromosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mitotic spreads were prepared as described [58] (link) with the exception that 5% Lipsol (Dynalab) was used as a detergent. Wild-type and mutated Smc6-3×HA-expressing cells were arrested in G2/M after a synchronous S-phase at 35° before preparation of spreads. Monoclonal rat-anti-HA (Roche) was used as the primary antibody followed by Cy3-conjugated goat-anti-rat (Invitrogen) to detect Smc6-3×HA on spreads. Each image was acquired under identical exposure conditions using a Leica microscope and 100× objective. Image analysis was carried out in Volocity (Perkin Elmer). Signals from >50 chromosome spreads were quantified using the analysis tools provided by the Volocity software (Perkin Elmer), and background staining in adjacent regions of the same size were subtracted. Box plots were made using standard statistical tools and represent all values measured between the maximum and the minimum. Statistical analysis to measure significance of differences between strains was done using a two-tailed T-test, with Welch's correction, which was used because the two populations compared had unequal variance. P-values greater than or equal to 0.05 were considered insignificant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

3D Reconstruction of Microscopy Images

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were acquired as a series of 2D tiff (FIB-SEM) or dm3 (3view) files. In order to compile a 3D tiff file format, the images were registered in Fiji (Schindelin et al., 2012 ) (http://fiji.sc/Fiji; Plugin Registration > StackReg > Translation) or IMOD (Kremer et al., 1996 (link)) (http://bio3d.colorado.edu/imod/; tiltxcorr algorithm). Representation of orthogonal views and/or threshold-based segmentation was done in Imaris (BitPlane, www.bitplane.com) or Fiji’s 3D Viewer. Manual segmentation and visualization of 3D data was done using 3DMOD (http://bio3d.colorado.edu/imod/doc/3dmodguide.html).
3D reconstructions of confocal images were done using Volocity (PerkinElmer, Volocity">www.perkinelmer.co.uk/Volocity).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!