The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

90 protocols using anti flag antibody

1

Immunoblotting and Immunoprecipitation Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blotting and immunoprecipitation (IP) assays were extracted as described previously.15 The following primary antibodies were used: anti‐LKB1 antibody from Abmart (Cambridge, MA, USA); anti‐Hsp90, anti‐Snail, anti‐AMPK, anti‐Twist, anti‐Slug, anti‐GSK3β, anti‐p‐GSK3β, anti‐HA, anti‐Myc, anti‐flag antibodies and HRP‐conjugated secondary antibodies from Cell Signaling Technology (Boston, MA, USA); and anti‐FBXL14 antibody from ABclonal (Wuhan, China). The experiments were repeated at least 3 times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibody Detection Protocols for Protein Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rabbit polyclonal anti-MuLVp30CA antiserum [47 (link)] and anti-KoRV CA [14 (link)] antiserum were described previously. For detection of epitope tags, mouse and rabbit anti-Flag antibodies (Cell Signaling), anti-V5 (Invitrogen) and anti-GFP (Biovision) were used. Beta-Tubulin levels were used to assess sample loading in the gels and were detected by rabbit anti-beta-Tubulin (Cell Signaling). For western blots, we used anti-mouse IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Thermo Scientific) and anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

LDLRAD3 Mutational Analysis for Viral Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A comprehensive mutation library was generated using gene synthesis by mutating a single amino acid in D1 of the LDLRAD3 protein. The amino acids that are essential for maintaining the structural integrity of LDLRAD3 (the cysteines forming disulfide bonds, the amino acids coordinating the calcium and those forming the hydrophobic core) were kept intact39 (link). The substitutions were determined using the BLOSUM scoring matrix40 (link) and a list of these is provided in Supplementary Table 4. The mutants were cloned into lentivirus vector pLV-EF1a-IRES-Hygro (Addgene, 85134) between the BamHI and MluI restriction enzyme sites (Genscript). An N-terminal Flag tag was added to each LDLRAD3 mutant to monitor protein expression. ∆B4galt7Ldlrad3 Neuro2a cells were transduced with each LDLRAD3 mutant and, 7 d later, were inoculated with SINV–VEEV (TrD)–GFP1 (link) (gift of W. Klimstra, University of Pittsburgh) infection at a multiplicity of infection of 20 for 7.5 h. Cells were stained with anti-Flag antibodies (1:2,000 dilution, Cell Signaling Technology, D6W5B) to measure the surface expression levels of the WT and mutant forms of LDLRAD3. Inoculated and stained cells were analysed using the MACSQuant Analyzer 10 (Miltenyi Biotec), and all flow cytometry data were processed using FlowJo (FlowJo).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of Cell Death Pathways

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Heart tissues and cells were homogenized and sonicated in a RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China), including a protease inhibitor cocktail. Target proteins were separated by SDS/PAGE gels, before being transferred onto 0.22-μm PVDF membranes. After blocking with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA), PVDF membranes were incubated with primary antibodies, including anti-Vinculin (Abcam, #ab219649), anti-FUNDC1(Abcam, #ab224722), anti-AIM2 (Abcam, #ab204995), anti-ZBP1 (Abcam, #ab290736), anti-Pyrin (Abcam, #ab195975), anti-Caspase1 (Abcam, #ab207802), anti-Caspase3 (Abcam, #ab32351), anti-Caspase8 (Proteintech, 13423-1-AP), anti-GSDMD (Abcam, #ab209845), anti-MLKL (Abcam, #ab184718), anti-p-MLKL (Abcam, #ab196436) anti-RIPK1 (Cell Signaling Technology, #73271), anti-p-RIPK1 (Cell Signaling Technology, #44590), anti-RIPK3 (Cell Signaling Technology, #10188), anti-p-RIPK3 (Cell Signaling Technology, #93654), anti-p-TUFM antibodies (Abcam, #ab173300) and anti-Flag antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, #14793) overnight at 4 °C. Secondary antibodies were employed for membrane incubation. Films were scanned and detected with a Bio-Rad calibrated densitometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Lentiviral Transduction of Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
293T, NCCIT, MDA-MB-231, and MDA-MB-468 cell lines were acquired from ATCC. Cells were cultured in “Tumor media” (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s media (DMEM) with ciprofloxacin 10 μg/ml, and 10% fetal calf serum), except NCCIT cells which were cultured in “NCCIT media” (RPMI 1640 medium, ATCC modification; GIBCO with ciprofloxacin 10 μg/ml, and 10% fetal calf serum). Cells were grown in sterile humidified tissue culture incubators at 37 °C with 5% CO2 and ambient (~ 17–18%) O2. Cells were transduced with lentiviral concentrates in the presence of 7 μg/ml polybrene for up to 16 h with transduction efficiency (not shown) suggesting MOI < 1. Cells were subsequently sorted for green fluorescence on a FACSAria fluorescence activated cell sorter (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ), following at least 3 days of culture. ALK4L75A-Fc expression was confirmed by western blot of cell lysates and immune-precipitation from conditioned media with protein A agarose beads (Abcam, Cambridge, UK, ab193254) and anti-Flag antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, 8146). Inducible short hairpin vectors were acquired from Dharmacon, Inc. (Lafayette, CO, Cat# V3SH11255-01EG6997).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibody Procurement for Cell Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human anti-cleaved PARP and anti-flag antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology. Anti-tubulin was procured from Bioworld Company. Anti-GLUT1 and anti-LDHA antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Anti-SUN2 (HPA001209) and anti-Sirt5 (HPA021798) antibodies were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunostaining and Immunoblotting Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies used were anti-FLAG antibodies (1:400 dilution for immunostaining, no. 14793; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA); Alexa Fluor secondary antibodies (1:500 dilution for immunostaining, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA); rhodamine phalloidin (3:500 dilution for immunostaining, PHDR1; Cytoskeleton, Inc., Denver, CO, USA); anti-FLAG® M2-HRP antibody (1:4,000 dilution for immunoblotting, A8592; Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA); anti-GFP HRP-DirecT antibody (1:2000 for immunoblotting, no. 598-7; MBL, Nagoya, Japan); anti-α-tubulin antibody (1:1000 for immunoblotting, no. B-5-1-2; Abcam, Cambridge, UK); HRP-coupled goat anti-mouse antibody (1:8,000, no. 55550; MP biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA); and anti-skeletal RLC known as MYLPF (1:4000, dilution for immunoblotting, 16052-1-AP; Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Probing Transcription Factor Binding Using EMSA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Commercial EMSA kit was used for the Electrophoretic mobility-shift assay (GS009, Chemiluminescent EMSA Kit, Beyotime, China) in this study. In brief, nuclear protein isolated from HepG2 cells applying Nuclear-Cytosol Extraction Kit (Applygen Technologies Inc, Beijing, China) was quantified with the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Boster, China). The rs144334493 insertion allele and deletion allele labeled oligonucleotides were commercially synthesized (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). Gel shift assays were conducted with the LightShift Chemilluminescent EMSA kit (GS009, Beyotime) following the manufacturer's instructions. For competition experiments, unlabeled rs144334493 insertion or deletion oligonucleotides in 100 fold molar excess were added followed by the addition of the biotinylated probes as well as anti-Flag antibodies (#14793, Cell Signaling) used in supershift assays. Three independent experiments were performed for the analysis. Sequence of probes and primers are given in Supplementary Table 6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting of S6 Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293T cells were harvested at 48 h post-transfection as described above and lysed with Cell Lysis Buffer (Cell Signaling Technology). Cell lysates were used for immunoprecipitation using anti-FLAG M2 affinity gel (Millipore) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Eluted proteins and Cell lysates (input) were analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting using following antibodies: anti-S6 monoclonal antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Cat No. 2217) and anti-FLAG antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Cat No. 14793). The chemiluminescence signal was detected using a ChemiDOCTMMP Imaging System (Bio-Rad Laboratories).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative western blot analysis was performed as described previously (Choi et al., 2014 (link)). The following antibodies were used: anti-Tau antibody (HT7, catalog # MN1000, ThermoFisher Scientific, 1:1000 dilution), anti-phosphorylated-Tau (at residue T212) antibody (catalog # 44740G, Invitrogen, 1:1000 dilution), anti-glyceraldehyde-phosphate-dehydrogenase (GAPDH) antibody (G-9, catalog # sc-365062, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 1:2000 dilution), anti-PS1 antibody, (catalog # 3622, Cell Signaling Technology) as well as anti-APP, anti-phospho-APP (at residue T668) and anti-Flag antibodies (catalog # 2452, catalog # 2451, catalog # 9146, all Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1000, 1:1000 and 1:1000 dilution, respectively). Anti-DYRK1A antibody (1:500 dilution) was generated as described previously (Ryoo et al., 2007 (link)). Anti-hnRNP-A1 antibody (1:1000 dilution) was kindly provided by Gideon Dreyfuss (University of Pennsylvania, PA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!