The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using f6627

1

Establishing 5-FU Resistant Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5-FU-resistant SW620 cells (SW620-R) were generated by continuously exposing the cells to an increasing concentration gradient of 5-FU (#F6627, 10–200 μM, Sigma-Aldrich) and cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, #12800017, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, #26400044, Invitrogen, USA), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (#15070063, Gibco, BRL) at 37℃ in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 based on the recent report in 2020 [32 (link)]. 5-FU-resistant HCT116 cells (HCT116-R) were established by treating them with gradually increasing concentrations of 5-FU (#F6627, 5 μM to 50 μM, Sigma-Aldrich) for 9 months and were maintained in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM, #12440–053, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with 10% FBS (#26400044, Invitrogen, USA) and 1% penicillin and streptomycin (#15070063, Gibco, BRL), in a humidified incubator (5% CO2) at 37℃, as previously described [33 (link)]. In addition the cell culture media was collected for follow-up tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Metronomic 5-FU Chemotherapy in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemotherapy was based on 5-FU (F6627, Millipore Sigma), which was first solubilized in dimethyl sulfoxide (97063-136, VWR) to a concentration of 50 mg/mL. This solution was then diluted in sterile saline to concentrations of 3.0 mg/mL (for the MTD group) and of 1.2 mg/mL (for the MET group), stored at -20 • C and thawed before administration. Mice were randomly distributed between maximum-tolerated (MTD, n=27), metronomic (MET, n=20) and control (CG, n=14) groups. All therapy was provided via intraperitoneal injection as follows: MTD, 20 mg/kg of 5-FU for five consecutive days every other week; MET, 8 mg/kg of 5-FU every other day three times a week; CG, 200 µL of sterile saline every other day (Figure 1A). Dosing and schedule for administration were determined using both reported MTD of 5-FU MTD in mice 30 (link) , and the NAC cycling in the clinical setting. For MET, we followed previously reported MET 5-FU dosing in mice 31, (link)32 (link) . The next day of the first treatment injection (either 5-FU or saline), mice started to receive endoscopic examination for the acquisition of DRS and biopsies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Metronomic vs. Maximum-Tolerated 5-FU Dosing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemotherapy was based on 5-FU (F6627, Millipore Sigma), which was first solubilized in dimethyl sulfoxide (97063-136, VWR) to a concentration of 50 mg/mL. This solution was then diluted in sterile saline to concentrations of 3.0 mg/mL (for the MTD group) and of 1.2 mg/mL (for the MET group), stored at -20 C and thawed before administration. Mice were randomly distributed between maximum-tolerated (MTD, n=27 ), metronomic (MET, n=20 ) and control (CG, n=14 ) groups. All therapy was provided via intraperitoneal injection as follows: MTD, 20 mg/kg of 5-FU for five consecutive days every other week; MET, 8 mg/kg of 5-FU every other day three times a week; CG, 200 µL of sterile saline every other day (Figure 1A). Dosing and schedule for administration were determined using both reported MTD of 5-FU MTD in mice [30] (link), and the NAC cycling in the clinical setting. For MET, we followed previously reported MET 5-FU dosing in mice 31 (link), 32 (link). The next day of the first treatment injection (either 5-FU or saline), mice started to receive endoscopic examination for the acquisition of DRS and biopsies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cytotoxic Compound Preparation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PTX (T7402, Millipore Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA), 5-FU (F6627, Millipore Sigma), CPT (22-515-0, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and TMS (10038, Cayman Chemicals, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA) were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; D2650, Millipore Sigma). The final concentration of DMSO in the media did not exceed 0.1%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Anticancer Drug Cytotoxicity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Determination of concentration for each anticancer drug in our experiments was based on its reported concentration in human cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) in chemotherapy, literature report of its neurotoxicity in culture, and our preliminary in vitro experimental data. At 13 d.i.v., the neuronal cell cultures were insulted with 100 μM of MTX (M9929, Sigma) [27 (link)–30 (link)], 25 μM of 5-FU (F6627, Sigma) [31 (link)–33 (link)], or 3.5 μM of CDDP (sc-200896, Santa Cruz) [34 (link), 35 (link)] for 3 days in absence or presence of PAN-811·Cl·H2O. For ROS examination, the neurons were insulted with both 100 μM of MTX and 25 μM of 5-FU by 15 d.i.v. PAN-811·Cl·H2O was added to cultures to final concentrations of 1.25, 2.5, 5, and 10 μM at the same time as addition of the anticancer drugs. For cancer cell lines, the cells were insulted by the second day of cell seeding with the same concentration of MTX, 5-FU, or CDDP as used in neuronal culture in the absence or presence of 10 μM PAN-811·Cl·H2O for another 3 days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cytotoxicity Assay for NOMO1 and SW620 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NOMO1 cells were seeded at a density of 16,667 cells/mL in 6-well plates in 3 mL of culture medium. After 24 hr incubation, cells were treated with 5-FU (Sigma-Aldrich F6627) (100 nM, 1 μM, 10 μM, 100 μM, or 1 mM) or doxorubicin (Sigma-Aldrich 44583) (1.95 nM, 7.81 nM, 31.25 nM, 125 nM, or 500 nM). All wells, including untreated controls, contained 0.5% DMSO. Following addition of drugs, plates were gently shaken for 2 min. After 4 days of treatment, 200 μL from each well was transferred to a white 96-well plate (Greiner) and cell viability was assessed with Cell Titer-Glo (Promega). Luminescence was measured with a SpectraMax M5 Plate Reader (Molecular Devices) and normalized to an untreated control.
SW620 cells were seeded in white 96-well plates (Greiner) at a density of 2000 cells/well and allowed to attach for 24 hr. 5-FU and doxorubicin were prepared in DMSO and dispensed using an HP D300 compound dispenser. Cell viability was assessed with Cell-Titer Glo at 4 days following treatment and luminescence was measured as described above.
Dose-response values were plotted in GraphPad Prism and fit using a One Site-Fit logIC50 equation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cell Viability Assay with 5-FU and Sodium Arsenite

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Control cells or MAGE-expressing cells were treated with indicated concentrations of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU, Sigma Aldrich F6627) or Sodium Arsenite (Sigma Aldrich, S7400) for 72 h and viability was measured using Cell-titer Glo (Promega G7570) on a Tecan luminescence plate reader. Viability at each time point was normalized to luminescence of DMSO control. Error bars indicate mean and standard deviation from n = 3 measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

CCK8 Assay for 5-FU Cytotoxicity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For cell counting kit 8 (CCK8) assay (#BB‐4221; BestBio, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China), SW620 cells transfected with Mex3a siRNA or HCT116 cells transfected with Mex3a overexpression plasmid were resuspended and counted, then cells were plated into 96‐well plates at a density of 1 × 104 cells per well and were treated with 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) (50, 100, 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000 µmol/L) (#F6627, Sigma, Shanghai, China). After 24 h of 5‐FU treatment, the cell viability was evaluated by assessing the optical density (OD) at 450 nm following the manufacturer's instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Organoid-Based Chemo-Sensitivity Screening

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Organoids were utilized in chemo-sensitivity screens mimicking intravenous conditions during which these were treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin, irinotecan, FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, or regorafenib as described previously.11 (link) Stock solutions of 10 mM were prepared for 5-FU (F6627; Sigma), irinotecan (I1406; Sigma), and regorafenib (S1178; Selleckchem) by dissolving in dime-thyl sulfoxide (DMSO), while oxaliplatin and folinic acid (47612; Sigma-Aldrich) were dissolved in deionized H2O. Treatment solutions were prepared in cell culture media to the following concentrations: 10 μM 5FU, 1 μM oxaliplatin, 1 μM irinotecan, 1:10:1 μM folinic acid:5FU:oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), 1:10:1 μM folinic acid:5FU:oxaliplatin (FOLFIRI), and 1 μM regorafenib. After 7 days, spent media was removed from organoids, and treatments were added to the wells. Organoids were treated for 72 h, after which viability assays were performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

MERS-CoV Infection Inhibition Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HuH7 cells seeded in 6-well clusters were infected with recombinant MERS-CoV at low MOI (30 PFU/well) for 1 h at 37°C. Subsequently, the inoculum was replaced with 2 ml of a 1.2% suspension of Avicel (RC-581; FMC Biopolymer) (101 (link)) in Dulbecco’s minimal essential medium (DMEM) (containing 2% FCS and antibiotics) and serial dilutions of 5-FU (F6627; Sigma-Aldrich) or ribavirin (R9644; Sigma-Aldrich) ranging from 0 to 400 μM. Cells were incubated at 37°C for 72 h and fixed with 7.4% formaldehyde, and plaques were visualized using crystal violet staining.
To compare the effect of 5-FU treatment on the progeny titers of wt and nsp14-E191D rMERS-CoV, confluent monolayers of HuH7 were incubated for 30 min at 37°C with solvent or a range of 5-FU concentrations. The drug was then removed and cells were infected at an MOI of 0.1 for 1 h at 37°C. After removal of the inoculum, EMEM containing 2% FCS and solvent or a matching concentration of 5-FU was added to the wells. Supernatants were collected after 30 h, and rMERS-CoV progeny titers were determined by plaque assay. All drug-treated samples were normalized to the untreated vehicle control, and values were expressed as fold change compared to untreated-virus titers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!