The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss for windows software

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States, Japan, Germany

SPSS for Windows is a statistical analysis software package developed by IBM. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data analysis, including data management, statistical modeling, and visualization. The software is designed to work on the Windows operating system and is widely used in various industries and academic settings for data-driven decision making.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

296 protocols using spss for windows software

1

Screening for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Prevalence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chi-squared test was used to compare the prevalence and confirmation rate of OCD between screening based on physical findings (2006-2007) and ultrasonographic screening (2011-2012) and the prevalence of OCD by school grade and radiographic classification. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows software (version 27; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Lung Cancer Prognosis and Pneumonia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Pearson’s Chi-square tests and Student’s t-test were used to compare clinical characteristics between lung cancer patients with and those without pneumonia. The survival curve according to the pneumonia development was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (Cis) were calculated for predictos that were significant in multivariate Cox regression analysis. A two-sided P value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows software (ver. 20.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Quantitative Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS for Windows software (version 19.0, IBM) was used for all data analyses. The normality of the quantitative variables was analyzed by the Shapiro-Wilk test. Quantitative variables with a normal distribution were analyzed by the independent-sample t test. Quantitative variables departing from a normal distribution were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test. Pearson's χ2 test and McNemar's exact test were used to test the differences in the distribution of categorical variables where appropriate. All significance levels refer to two-sided tests. A P value of < 0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of lncRNA Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows software (version 27.0; IBM SPSS Statistics, USA) and GraphPad Prism 9.1.2 software were used for data analysis. Data were presented as the median and interquartile range or frequency and percentage. Chi-square (χ2), Fisher’s exact, and Mann–Whitney U (MW) tests were used. Spearman correlation analysis was carried out to assess lncRNAs co-expression. Cox proportional regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictor risk factors for mortality. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported. Statistical significance was set at a p-value <0.05. Heatmap, hierarchical clustering, box plots, and correlation matrix were generated using “reshape2”, “scales”, “RColorBrewer”, “gplots”, “psych”, “factoextra”, “FactoMineR”, and “ggpubr” R package.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis Using SPSS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SPSS for Windows software (version 21.0; IBM Corp.) was used to perform all the statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Esophageal Cancer Distress Risk Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Risk factors for psychological distress related to treatment for esophageal cancer were assessed by bivariate logistic regression analysis (Backward stepwise selection). We selected 31 variables which are the perioperative information including the operative findings accumulating regularly unintentionally at our hospital. Differences between the group with HADS scores ≤ 10 and the group with HADS scores ≥ 11 were tested for statistical significance using Fisher’s exact test, the unpaired Student’s t-test, the Mann–Whitney U test, and Pearson’s chi-squared test as appropriate. The variables with a p-value less than 0.05 in univariate analysis were entered into bivariate logistic analysis. The sets of bivariate logistic analysis were constructed in the development cohort using backward stepwise selection of predictors (a p-value < 0.05 was required for inclusion). Odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant in bivariate logistic analysis. The discrimination ability of the model was assessed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, that is, the concordance (C)-index (area under the curve) values, at times 1–5. All analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows software (version 19.0 J; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Anemia Impact on Clinical Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Baseline demographics and clinical outcomes were compared between patients with anemia and non-anemia. We used Pearson’s chi-square test to compare discrete variables and Student’s t-test or analysis of variance to compare continuous variables. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare median value. Hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for predictors that were significant in multivariate Cox regression analysis. A two-sided P value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows software (ver. 20.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Radiological Outcomes of Disc Degeneration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The preoperative anterior/posterior disc heights and segmental angle were compared with those on the last follow-up radiographs using a paired t test. The associations between the radiological parameters and patients’ demographics, cage parameters, or vertebral EP lesions were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance test, chi-square test, or Pearson’s correlation test. Inter- and intraobserver reliabilities for the categorization of the vertebral EP lesions were estimated using kappa values. Agreement was rated as fair, moderate, substantial, or excellent with respective kappa values of 0.21 to 0.4, 0.41 to 0.60, 0.61 to 0.8, or >0.81. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS for Windows software (version 19.0; IBM Corp). In all analyses, P < .05 was taken to indicate statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comparison of Biometric Device Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows software (version 26; IBM Corporation), and Microsoft Excel 2013. Power calculations were performed using PASS version 16.0.12. Normality of AL data was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk test. A two-sided t-test for paired samples was used to test AL differences between both devices. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comparing Bony EAC Volume and Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To compare the data, we used SPSS for Windows software (ver. 20.0; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). We deemed p<0.05 to indicate statistical significance. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test whether our data were normally distributed. In cases of normally distributed data, we used the paired t-test; if the date were not normal, we used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. To analyze the correlation of the volume of the bony EAC with the others, we used a multiple linear regression model.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!