The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Hypersil gold c18 column

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, France

The Hypersil GOLD C18 column is a reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column. It is designed for the separation and analysis of a wide range of organic compounds. The column features a chemically bonded C18 stationary phase, which provides efficient and selective chromatographic separations.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

219 protocols using hypersil gold c18 column

1

HPLC Separation of PapB and QueE Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All of the assays and controls were analyzed as described (30 (link), 40 (link)) with the following modifications for the assays that contained both prereduced wildtype (WT) PapB and QueE. A 50-μl aliquot was injected onto a Hypersil GOLD C18 column (2.1 mm x 150 mm, 1.9 mm particle size) (Thermo Fisher) preequilibrated in 0.1% (v/v) Optima TFA (Fisher) in LC-MS Optima water (Fisher). The separation consisted of washing with 100% A (0.1% [v/v] TFA in Optima water) from 0 to 3 min, followed by a linear gradient from 0 to 40% B (0.1% [v/v] TFA in Optima acetonitrile) from 3 to 20 min, followed by a linear gradient from 40% B to 100% B from 20 to 23 min, washing with 100% B from 23 to 26.5 min, and re-equilibration into 100% A from 26.5 to 30.1 min.
The assays that contained a PapB variant and QueE were analyzed as follows. A 20-μl aliquot was injected onto a Hypersil GOLD C18 column (2.1 mm x 150 mm, 1.9 mm particle size) (Thermo Fisher) preequilibrated in 0.1% (v/v) Optima TFA (Fisher) in LC-MS Optima water (Fisher). The separation consisted of washing with 100% A (0.1% [v/v] TFA in Optima water) from 0 to 3 min, followed by a linear gradient from 0 to 20% B (0.1% [v/v] TFA in Optima acetonitrile) from 3 to 20 min, followed by a linear gradient from 20% B to 100% B from 20 to 23 min, washing with 100% B from 23 to 26.5 min, and re-equilibration into 100% A from 26.5 to 30.1 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Spectroscopic and HPLC Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1H-, 13C- and 19F-NMR spectra were recorded on DRX500 or ARX-800 spectrometers (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) in [D6] DMSO or CDCl3 with or without the internal standard of TMS at 0.05 or 0.1% v/v. The purity of all final compounds was > 95% purity as assessed by HPLC. Final compounds were analyzed on a 1200 series chromatograph (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The chromatographic methods used were either: (A) Hypersil GOLD C18 column (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) 3 µM particle size, 150 mm length, 4.6 mm ID) or (B) a Thermo Scientific Hypersil GOLD C18 column (3 µM particle size, 250 mm length, 4.6 mm ID). UV detection wavelength = 254 nm; flow rate = 1.0 mL min−1; solvent = acetonitrile/water. Both organic and aqueous mobile phase contain 0.1% v/v trifluoroacetic acid. The mass spectrometer used is a CMS-L Compact Mass Spectrometer (Advion, Ithaca, NY, USA) with an ESI or an APCI ionization source. Samples are submitted for analysis using either the atmospheric solids analysis probe (ASAP) or flow injection analysis (FIA). Compounds were prepared according to the following protocols and are detailed below. Intermediates 13a (Catalog #V4659, AK Scientific, Union City, CA, USA) and 13b (Catalog #7975AH, AK Scientific) were purchased from commercial vendors. These intermediates were left in Scheme 3 for continuity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Plant-Derived Alkaloid Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PAs in the samples were measured using a LC-MS/MS system consisting of an UHPLC (Ultimate 3000, Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) and a Triple Stage Quadrupole mass spectrometer (TSQ Vantage, Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA), as described previously with minor modifications [21 (link)]. Briefly, chromatographic separation was achieved on 150 × 2.1 mm, 1.9 μm particle sizes, C18 Hypersil Gold column fitted with a guard column (Thermo Scientific, Dreieich, Germany). Eluent A was 100% water with 0.1% formic acid and 5 mM of ammonium formate. Eluent B was 95% methanol and 5% water with 0.1% formic acid and 5 mM of ammonium formate. A stepwise gradient elution was conducted as follows: 0–0.5 min for 95% A/5% B, 7.0 min for 50% A/50% B, 7.5 min for 20% A/80% B, 7.6–9.0 min for 100% B and 9.1–15 min for 95% A/ 5% B. A flow rate of 300 μL/minute was applied and 10 μL of each sample was injected. The column temperature was maintained at 40 °C. Details of the mass parameters are listed in supporting data S1, Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

UHPLC Analysis of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All measurements were conducted on an UltiMate 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC) system. Chromatographic reversed-phase (RP) separation with 5 µL injection volume was performed on a C18 Hypersil Gold column (150 mm × 2.1 mm; 1.9 μm particle size) with guard column (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min and with a column temperature of 40 °C. The binary mobile phase was composed of water as mobile phase A and methanol as mobile phase B, both containing 0.1% formic acid and 5 mM ammonium formate. The gradient conditions were as follows: 0–0.5 min A: 95% / B: 5%, 7.0 min A: 50%/B: 50%, 7.5 min A: 20% / B: 80%, 7.6 min A: 0% / B: 100%, 10.1–15 min A: 95% / B: 5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Kinetics of ADO Crystal Dissolution

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The kinetics of ADO dissolution from the formulated crystals were studied using a Slide-A-Lyzer dialysis cassette (Thermo Scientific, 3.5 kDa cutoff) stirred at room temperature for 72 h in a beaker containing phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) under sink conditions. The dialysis cassettes were presoaked in the medium as recommended by the manufacturer followed by loading 1 mL of the respective samples in the dialysis cassette. The cassettes were immersed in a beaker containing PBS with continuous stirring. ADO solution (3 mg/mL) and ADO crystal suspension (25 mM) from the vendor served as controls. At various time points, 1 mL of the medium was collected for measurement using an Agilent 1200 HPLC equipped with a UV detector set at 280 nm. A TSK Gel 4000 SWXL precolumn was used. ADO was quantified using a reverse-phase HPLC method using a C 18 Hypersil GOLD column purchased from Thermo Scientific. The mobile phase used was phosphate buffer pH 4.5 and methanol (90:10) under isocratic flow conditions at a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min. ADO concentrations were quantified based on UV absorbance at 260 nm using a standard curve.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Prodigiosin Extraction from Bacterial Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crude extract was obtained as described previously (Patil et al., 2011 (link)). Briefly, 2 × 500 mL of culture were incubated for 24 or 48 h at 30 and 37°C (only for WT), shaking at 180 rpm. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 3900 rpm for 60 min. Pellets were washed four times with 40 mL acidified ethanol (1% v/v HCl 37% in absolute ethanol). The supernatants were dried under low pressure with a rotatory evaporator (Heidolph Laborota 4000) below 40°C.
Prodigiosin hydrochloride (HPLC purity ≥90%, CAS N°: 56144-17-3; Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved to 0.2 mg/mL in methanol and used without further purification. HPLC samples were prepared from extracts diluted to 10 mg/mL in methanol and 0.22 μm-filtered. For each sample, 10 μL was injected in a Varian 920-LC system equipped with a UV-VIS detector and a photodiode array detector (C18 Hypersil Gold column, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 3 μm, 2.1 × 150 mm, flow rate 0.7 mL/min). All samples were analyzed using a linear gradient of H2O/CH3CN/formic Acid (98:2:0.1 to 2:98:0.1) and detection was performed at 208, 254, 280, and 532 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Determination of Food Contaminants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Determination of toxic metals was performed as described for the mineral analysis (Section 3.7). Cyanotoxins were analysed by the EPA Method 544 using a Liquid Phase Chromatograph Finnigan Surveyor (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA), coupled with a spectrometry detector (MS Mass LCQ FleetTM ion trap), with an electrospray (ESI) interface and a C18 Hypersil Gold column (100 × 4.6 mm I.D., 5 μm, ThermoScientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The absence of microcystins-LR, -RR, -LA, and cylindrospermopsin was confirmed by the non-existence of the precursor ion for each cyanotoxin, 995.5[M + H]+, 519.9 [M + 2H]2+, 910.5 [M + H]+, and 416.5 [M + H]+, respectively. Aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, and G2 were determined using an Agilent Technologies 1200 series HPLC coupled to a SPHERISORB column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 µm ODS2, Waters) according to ISO16050:2003. The analysis of PAHs and pesticides was performed by Silliker Portugal S.A., using certified methods. PAHs were analysed using a 7890 Agilent GC-MS equipped with a J&W VF-17 MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm, Agilent) according to F013550.0. Pesticides, both organochlorine (25 pesticides) and residues (about 250 pesticides), were evaluated using an Agilent 7890 gas chromatograph coupled to a 7000 Series MS according to the PS1052 e PS0001110 methods, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

HPLC Analysis of Culture Media Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The changes in the chemical composition of the experimental and control culture media were assessed by reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using a Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC system (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) equipped with diode array detector (DAD-3000RS). The mobile phase consisted of two solvents: A—MeCN; B—1% HCOOH in H2O. A 28 min gradient elution was used with the following conditions: 1 min 50/50%, A/B; 15 min 50 to 100% A; 5 min 100% A; 2 min 100 to 50% A; 5 min 50/50% A/B. The samples were filtered through non-sterile syringe filters with a pore size of 0.45 μm. A total of 20 μl of each prepared sample was injected onto a C-18 Hypersil Gold column (150 x 4.6, Thermo Scientific Part N 25005–154630), with the retention times and peak intensities of separated compounds assessed at 290 and 360 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

UHPLC Analysis of Compounds Using C18 Column

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All measurements were conducted on an Agilent 1290 Infinity Series UHPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA). Chromatographic reversed-phase separation with 2 μL injection volume was performed on a C18 Hypersil Gold column (150 mm × 2.1 mm; 1.9 μm particle size) with guard column (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min and with a column temperature of 40 °C. The binary mobile phase was composed of water as mobile phase A and methanol as mobile phase B, both containing 0.1% formic acid and 5 mmol ammonium formate. The gradient conditions were as follows: 0-0.5 min A: 95%/B: 5%; 7.0 min A: 50%/B: 50%; 7.5 min A: 20%/B: 80%; 7.6 min A: 0%/B: 100%; 10.1-15 min A: 95%/B: 5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Analysis of Apocynin in Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The detection of apocynin in tissue sample was performed as described previously with some modifications.17 In brief, apocynin was detected using an Accela HPLC coupled to a linear ion‐trap tandem mass spectrometry (LTQ‐Orbitrap XL; Thermo‐Fisher Scientific) (HPLC‐MS/MS) in the negative ion mode. Phenacetin (500 ng/mL) was used as an internal standard in every vial. A reversed‐phase 50 × 2.1 mm ID, 1.9 mm particle, 175 Å pore C18 Hypersil Gold column (Thermo Scientific) was used with injection volume set at 5 µL for the separation of apocynin and phenacetin. Calibration curve used for PK analysis was constructed by spiking apocynin in mouse plasma using eight calibrators ranging from 1 to 10000 ng/mL with great reproducibility and R2 ≥ 0.996 for subsequent 5 separate experiments on different days. Best fit curve was achieved using linear regression model (1/2 weighting factor) which showed minimum percentage relative error. Limit of detection for apocynin was set up at signal to noise ratio ≥ 3,18 which is 1 ng/mL in our system. The limitation of quantification was set up at signal to noise ratio ≥ 10, which is 10 ng/mL in our system. Orbitrap component was used for the full scan spectra of apocynin and diapocynin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!