The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cypher atomic force microscope

Manufactured by Oxford Instruments
Sourced in United States

The Cypher atomic force microscope is a high-performance instrument designed for advanced nanoscale imaging, measurement, and characterization. It provides a versatile platform for exploring the topography and properties of surfaces at the nanoscale.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using cypher atomic force microscope

1

Visualizing Colloidal Protein Biopolymers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Visualisation of CPB was performed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and atomic force microscopy (AFM). For TEM, we put a few drops of the CPB solution on a carbon-coated copper grid (Structure Probe, Inc.), stained the sample with 2% uranyl acetate (Electron Microscopy Sciences), and carried out TEM (JEOL JEM-2100, Jeol). For SEM, we pipetted a few drops of the CPB solution on a glass microscope slide (Thermo Scientific), dried at room temperature (RT) O/N, mounted the slides on a double sided adhesive conductive carbon tape (Ted Pella), sputter coated with Au-Pd (SC7640, Emitech), and finally performed SEM (Zeiss CrossBeam 1540 XB, Carl Zeiss). For AFM, we pipetted a few drops of the CPB solution on a mica disc (Ted Pella), and conducted AFM using Cypher™ Atomic Force Microscope (Asylum Research).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Atomic Force Microscopy Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PFM was performed by an Asylum Research Cypher atomic force microscope operating in DART mode. ASYELEC-01 probes of force constant ∼1–3 Nm−1 and a conductive coating of Ti/Ir were used. The radius of curvature for these probes is ∼50 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Optimized SrMnO3 Thin Film Growth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The epitaxial
SrMnO3 thin films were grown on TiO2-terminated
(001)-oriented SrTiO3 substrates (Shinkosha) by PLD using
a stoichiometric, polycrystalline target (Lesker). For making the
single terminated TiO2 surface of STO substrates, the STO
substrates were prepared by ultrasonification in water and then treated
by a combination of etching with a buffered HF solution and ex situ annealing at 1050 °C.73 (link) The growth temperature was 800 °C, the oxygen pressure was
0.05 mbar, the laser fluency was 2 J cm–2, the laser
frequency was 1 Hz, and the growth rate was 0.04 monolayer per pulse.
The wavelength of the KrF laser was 248 nm. The growth mode is a layer-by-layer
growth as evidenced by the observation of reflection high-energy electron
diffraction (RHEED) oscillations. The surface morphology was investigated
by a Cypher atomic force microscope (Asylum Research, Santa Barbara,
CA, U.S.A.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

AFM Imaging of Surface Roughness

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM scans were performed under tapping mode in air using a Cypher atomic force microscope (Asylum Research, Goleta, CA). Samples were imaged using a force constant of 0.2 N m–1, scan rate of 2.44 Hz and scan size of 4 μm × 4 μm. Images were processed and analyzed for Root Mean Square (RMS) surface roughness using Igor Pro software (WaveMetrics, Lake Oswego, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Conductance Analysis of Bacterial Filaments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For examination with atomic force microscopy, 25–40 µL of the culture was drop-cast onto a conductive 35 nm platinum-coated silicon wafer as previously described (15 (link)). After 12 min, the excess liquid was wicked off with filter paper, the sample was rinsed with deionized water, and the excess liquid was removed with filter paper. The samples were equilibrated with the chamber humidity (ca. 40%) and visualized with a Cypher atomic force microscope (Asylum Research, Oxford Instruments) as previously described (15 (link)). Initially, the cells and filaments were viewed under tapping mode (AC-air topography) with a Pt/Ir-coated tip (PtSi-FM, NanoWorld) at approximately 2.0 N/m spring force constant and 70 kHz resonance frequency. After filament height determination, contact mode was engaged with the tip gently placed on top of the filament (force 30 ± 1.1 nN) as the translatable top electrode. Quadruplicate amplitude voltage sweeping of ±0.4 V at a frequency of 0.99 Hz was applied and averaged for I–V response curves. The conductance of the filament was calculated using the linear slope between 0.2 V and −0.2 V in the I–V response.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Atomic Force Microscopy of S-layer Sheets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM imaging
was done with an Asylum Research Cypher atomic force microscope (Asylum
Research Santa Barbara, CA, USA). Measurements were performed in liquid
using the AC mode. A cantilever “BioLever mini” (Olympus
BL-AC40TS-C2) with a resonance frequency of about 25 kHz in water
and a stiffness of 0.09 N m–1 has been used. A 10
μL portion of recrystallized S-layer sheets was dropped on freshly
cleaved mica attached to a steel sample puck. They were left undisturbed
for 5 min to promote adhesion. Most of the supernatant was removed
with a pipet and replaced by a droplet of recrystallization buffer
(1.5 mM Tris, 10 mM CaCl2, pH 8) to keep the sample in
liquid upon transfer to a sample stage on AFM and following the measurement.
The temperature was kept at 25 °C, scan frequency at 0.5 Hz,
and scan angle at 90°.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Morphological Characterization of PLA Blends

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM was used to investigate the morphology of the samples. Bar specimens of PLA-c, PLA-g-TPCS, PLA-GRH, and PLA-g-TPCS-GRH blends were produced by compression molding using pellets from the twin-screw extruder. Bars of PLA-g-TPCS and PLA-g-TPCS-GRH were immersed in liquid nitrogen for ~3 min, then fractured by hand, treated with hydrochloric acid (6 N) for 6 h to remove the TPCS phase, and air dried for 12 h in a fume hood [17 (link)]. Finally, the samples were mounted on aluminum stubs using carbon suspension cement (SPI Supplies, West Chester, PA, USA). Samples of films evaluated before and after tensile testing were also mounted on aluminum stubs with high vacuum carbon tabs (SPI Supplies) and coated with iridium at a thickness of ~2.7 nm. Samples were examined in a JEOL 6610LV (tungsten hairpin emitter) and a JEOL 7500F (field emission emitter) scanning electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at various magnifications at 10 and 3.0 kV, respectively.
AFM was conducted using a Cypher™ atomic force microscope (Oxford Instruments Asylum Research, Inc., Santa Barbara, CA, USA) in the contact mode. Roughness parameters, calculated as the root mean square (Rq) and average roughness (Ra), were determined for each type of film and were calculated from the Htr mode image. Images were obtained in the Dfr mode. The film area for the determination of roughness was 900 μm2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Membrane Surface Topography and Chemistry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface topography of membranes is characterized by Cypher Atomic Force Microscope (Oxford Instruments Asylum Research, Inc., CA, USA). A cantilever with a cone tip (Innovative Solutions Bulgaria Ltd., Sofia, Bulgaria) is used to scan a 30 μm * 30 μm area in the air-tapping mode. The arithmetic average roughness of the solid regions excluding the nanopores of the membranes are measured by Igor pro software (WaveMetrics, OR, USA). To visualize the nanopore distribution on membranes, scanning electron microscopy images are taken with Ultra55 scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, LLC, NY, USA). Nanopore size and density are quantified by ImageJ (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). For characterization of the membrane surface chemistry, X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS) analysis is performed with a K-Alpha XPS System (Thermal Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) to scan the membranes from 0eV to 1350 eV with 1 eV step size.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!