The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Jem 2100f field emission tem

Manufactured by JEOL
Sourced in Japan, United States

The JEM-2100F field emission TEM is a transmission electron microscope manufactured by JEOL. It is designed to provide high-resolution imaging and analytical capabilities for a wide range of materials science and biological applications. The JEM-2100F utilizes a field emission electron source to generate a high-brightness electron beam, enabling enhanced resolution and signal-to-noise ratio.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using jem 2100f field emission tem

1

High-Resolution TEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HRTEM images were acquired with JEOL JEM-2100F field-emission TEM with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Synthesis and Characterization of Al2O3-Coated Fe3O4 Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fe3O4 nanoparticles were synthesized using the polyol method previously described by Ammar et al. [19 ,20 (link)]. Briefly, 1,2-propanediol solution containing 8 mM iron (III) chloride, 24 mM sodium acetate, and 2 mL water was refluxed for 15 h. The nanoparticles were extracted from solution with a neodymium magnet, washed with water and dispersed for 24 h in a solution of 20 mM Al(NO3)3 and 100 mM KNO3, adjusted to pH 7. The Al2O3 coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles were rinsed and briefly stored in PBMCA buffer (pH 7.4) until cell coating experiments were performed. Characterization of the particles was achieved with a JEOL JEM-2100F Field Emission TEM (JEOL USA, Inc., Peabody, MA) with scanning TEM and Oxford energy dispersive x-ray spectrometry capabilities, and a Zetasizer Nano ZS90 particle analyzer (Malvern Instruments Ltd, Worcestershire WR14 1XZ, UK). Analysis of the particle size showed an average diameter of 17 ± 6 nm. The surface charge was determined as a positive potential of 64 ± 3 mV. To further confirm the presence of the Al2O3 functional group, an elemental analysis was performed using an EDX measurement (Supporting Information Fig. 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Nanofiber Mats via Microscopy and X-ray Diffraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the nanofiber mats was assessed using an S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Prior to examination, samples were platinum sputter-coated. The average nanofiber diameter was determined from at least 100 measurements in FESEM images, using the Image J software (National Institutes of Health, MD, USA). To observe the cross sections of the fibers, mats were placed into liquid nitrogen and manually broken prior to sputtering.
Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of the samples were recorded on a JEM 2100 F field emission TEM (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Fiber samples were collected by fixing a lacey carbon-coated copper grid to the collector. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was conducted using a D/Max-BR diffractometer (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) over the 2θ range 5° to 60°. The instrument supplies Cu Kα radiation generated at 40 mV and 30 mA. The raw quercetin particles were also studied under cross-polarized light using an XP-700 polarized optical microscope (Shanghai Changfang Optical Instrument Co. Ltd, Shanghai, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Regenerated Fibers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) micrographs were captured on a JEOL JEM 2100F Field Emission TEM (Tokyo, Japan). X-ray photoelectron spectra were measured using Auger electron spectroscopy with an X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (AES-XPS) Kratos/Shimadzu Axis Ultra DLD (Manchester, England). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the regenerated FMS/PU was examined using a PANalytical X’Pert PRO (Malvern, UK) with an operating voltage of 30 kV and current of 30 mA. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were recorded by using a BX Perkin Elmer (Akron, OH, USA) with the universal attenuated total reflectance (UATR) technique to identify functional groups that are present in the spent FMS/PU.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Magnetic Oxide Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In addition to the characterization details provided by the manufacturer, the primary particle size of MONPs was also analyzed in-house using TEM. In brief, dry MONPs were analyzed by a JEM-2100F Field Emission TEM (JEOL, Peabody, MA, USA). Several images of each MONP dry suspension were obtained, and at least 100 individual NPs were sized using ImageJ 1.53g to determine the length and width of NPs. GraphPad Prism Software 9.5.0 (San Diego, CA, USA) was used to create frequency distribution histograms. Scanning electron micrographs of the MOMPs were taken using a JSM-7500F Field Emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JEOL, Peabody, MA, USA). The primary size of the MOMPs was not determined due to their size and aggregate state.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Mineral Characterization of NBC Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mineral content of NBC before and aer acid treatment were determined using a FEI Nova NanoSEM 230 eld emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) attached with an Oxford X-max energy dispersive X-ray analyser (EDX). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to visualize the dispersion of NBC within the polymer matrix. TEM images were obtained using a JEOL JEM 2100F Field Emission TEM (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). A thin layer of composite was sectioned at -80 °C using an ultramicrotome and placed on a copper grid for viewing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Interaction of GNCs with MRSA: Microstructural Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To specify the interaction between GNCs and MRSA, their microstructure analysis was characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The former bacterial was mixed with hydrogels incubation at 37 ​°C and 250 ​rpm for 12 ​h, and the untreated group was prepared as control. The following steps are carried out in sequence. The samples were fixation in 2.5% glutaraldehyde. Then, the fixed bacterial were washed 3 times with PBS (0.1 ​M, pH ​= ​7.0) for 15min each, followed postfixed with 1% OsO4 (osmium tetroxide) for 90 ​min. The samples were then dehydrated with graded ethanol (30, 50, 70, 80, 90, 95, and 100% [v/v]) for 15 ​min each. Later, samples were treated with acetone for 20 ​min, the samples were embedded in epoxy resin to prepare ultrathin sections. After being stained with lead citrate-uranyl acetate by standard methodology, the ultrathin sections were observed in the JEM-2100F field emission TEM (JEOL, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Characterization of Aqueous Quantum Dots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images and corresponding elemental mapping images were measured for the morphology and elemental composition of the NPs using a JEM-2100F field emission TEM (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8 ADVANCE, Bruker, Germany) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB 250Xi, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) were used to determine the physical form and chemical composition of AQDs. Raman spectra were measured using a Horiba Jobin Yvon Labram HR-800 Raman spectrometer (Paris, France). The hydrodynamic particle size was determined on a Malvern Zetasizer Nanoseries (Nano ZS90, Malvern, UK). Ultraviolet–visible–near-infrared (UV–vis–NIR spectra) were recorded by using a UV-1700 PC spectrometer (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). The contents of Ca2+ and AQDs were quantified by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES, Prodigy 7, Leeman Laboratories, Hudson, NH, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Deuterated Compound Solutions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemical structures of the compounds in deuterated solvents were characterized by 1 H NMR spectroscopy on a Bruker ARX 500 MHz spectrometer. Dynamic light scattering and zeta potential of the compounds in aqueous solution at pH 8.5 and 22 °C was measured on a Malvern ZEN3600 zetasizer. Fluorescence analyses were performed on a Shimadzu RF-6000 spectrofluorophotometer. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained on a JEOL JEM-2100F field emission TEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!