The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Nanoacquity uplc

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The NanoAcquity UPLC is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system designed for the analysis of small sample volumes. It features a nanoflow liquid chromatography configuration with high sensitivity and resolution, suitable for applications such as proteomics, metabolomics, and other analytical techniques that require the separation and detection of trace-level analytes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

20 protocols using nanoacquity uplc

1

Targeted Mass Spectrometry for PIR Cross-linked Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PIR cross-linked peptides were analyzed in technical triplicate by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry using a Waters NanoAcquity UPLC coupled to a Thermo Velos-FTICR mass spectrometer(Weisbrod et al., 2013b (link)) and a real-time adaptive, targeted mass spectrometry method developed for PIR cross-linked peptides (ReACT) (Weisbrod et al., 2013a (link)). Peptides were separated by reversed-phase chromatography. Eluting peptide ions with a charge state of four or greater were selected for high resolution MS2 analysis in the ICR cell where an “on-the-fly” check of the observed fragment ion masses against the PIR mass relationship (Mass Precursor = Mass Reporter Ion + Mass Peptide 1 + Mass Peptide 2) is performed. Masses that satisfied the PIR relationship within a tolerance of 20 ppm mass error triggered subsequent low resolution MS3 analyses of the released cross-linked peptide ions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

UPLC-MS/MS for Proteomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were performed on a system consisting of a Waters NanoAcquity UPLC (Milford, MA, USA) interfaced with a Thermo Scientific Q-Exactive mass spectrometer (Bremen, Germany) through a nanoelectrospray ion source. Mobile phase A consisted of 0.1% formic acid in H2O, and mobile phase B consisted of 0.1% formic acid in ACN. Four microliters of each sample was injected onto a Waters Symmetry C18 5 µm, 180 µm × 20 mm trap column at a flow rate of 5 µL/min for 5 min at 99% A/1% B. Separation was performed on a Waters BEH130 C18 1.7 µm, 75 µm × 150 mm analytical column using a linear gradient of 5–35% mobile phase B at 300 nL/min over 90 min. The Q-Exactive was operated in data-dependent mode to automatically switch between survey scan MS and MS/MS acquisition. Survey scan spectra were acquired in the orbitrap mass analyzer using a mass range of m/z 200–2000 at a resolving power of 70,000 FWHM (m/z 200) with an AGC target of 1e6. The top ten precursor ions were sequentially selected for HCD fragmentation and MS/MS analysis in the orbitrap at a resolving power of 17,500 with an AGC target of 1e5. MS/MS scans employed an isolation window of 3.0 Da and a normalized collision energy of 30. Precursors were subjected to dynamic exclusion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Proteomic Analysis of AlgoCIS Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The purified AlgoCIS samples were sent in solutions to the Functional Genomics Center Zürich (FGCZ), which performed the mass spectrum and the subsequent data analysis. The samples were first digested by trypsin. These digested samples were dried and dissolved in 20 μl ddH2O with 0.1% formic acid. The samples were transferred to autosampler vials for liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis (LC–MS/MS). The samples were diluted at the ratio 1:40, with 1 μl of each sample being injected on a nanoAcquity UPLC coupled to a Q-Exactive mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher).
The acquired MS data were converted to a Mascot Generic File format and were processed for identification using the Mascot search engine (Matrixscience). In addition, the acquired MS data were imported into PEAKS Studio (Bioinformatic Solutions) and were searched against the Algoriphagus machipongonensis database. The results were visualized by Scaffold software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Shotgun Proteomics Analysis of HeLa and Yeast

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptides were separated with a Waters NanoAcquity UPLC and emitted into a Thermo Q-Exactive HF tandem mass spectrometer. Pulled tip columns were created from 75 μm inner diameter fused silica capillary in-house using a laser pulling device and packed with 3 μm ReproSil-Pur C18 beads (Dr. Maisch) to 300 mm. Trap columns were created from 150 μm inner diameter fused silica capillary fritted with Kasil on one end and packed with the same C18 beads to 25 mm. Solvent A was 0.1% formic acid in water, while solvent B was 0.1% formic acid in 98% acetonitrile. For each injection, 3 μl (approximately 1 μg) was loaded and eluted using a 90-minute gradient from 5 to 35% B, followed by a 40 min washing gradient. Data were acquired using either data-dependent acquisition (DDA) or data-independent acquisition (DIA). Three DDA and DIA HeLa and yeast technical replicates were acquired by alternating between acquisition modes to minimize bias. Serum-starved HeLa acquisition was randomized within blocks to enable downstream statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HPLC-MS/MS Peptide Profiling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four-plex pooled samples were reconstituted in 0.1% formic acid before injection. The HPLC-MS/MS analysis was conducted using a Waters nanoACQUITY UPLC coupled with Thermo Q Exactive Orbitrap MS. The separation column was in-house made with an emitter tip and dimensions of 75 μm inner diameter × 15 cm length. The column was packed with 1.7 μm, 150 Å, ethylene-bridged-hybrid (BEH) C18 material (Waters, Milford, MA). Mobile phase A was water containing 0.1% formic acid, and mobile phase B was acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid. The flow rate was set as 0.3 μL/min, and the LC gradient was 55 min and set as follows: 0−10 min, 3%−30% solvent B; 10−30 min, 30−80% B; 30–30.5 min, 80%−95% B; 30.5− 40.5 min, 95% B; 40.5−41 min, 95%−3% B; 41–55 min, 3% B. Positive ionization mode was used and full MS scans were acquired from m/z 180 to 800 at a resolution of 60 k, automatic gain control (AGC) was set as 5× 10^5, and a maximum injection time as set as 30 ms. The top 20 precursors were selected for normalized collision energy (NCE) dissociation (NCE = 30) with an isolation window of m/z 1, fixed first m/z 110, dynamic exclusion of 5 seconds, charge exclusion of >2, and a resolution of 35 k.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Urine Peptide Profiling by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Labeled urine peptide samples were dissolved in 0.1% FA and separated with a Waters nanoAcquity UPLC before entering a Thermo Q-Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer (San Jose, CA). Each sample was injected twice. Mobile phase A consisted of water with 0.1% FA, and mobile phase B was composed of ACN with 0.1% FA. Samples were loaded onto a fabricated column with an integrated emitter. The 75 μm ID column was filled to a length of 15 cm using Ethylene Bridged Hybrid C18 packing material (1.7 μm, 130 Å, Waters). Peptides were trapped onto the column in 100% A and separated using a solvent gradient of 0–10% B over 0.5 min and then 10–30% B over 70 min at a flow rate of 350 nL/min. Data-dependent acquisition (DDA) parameters recorded MS scans in profile mode from m/z 380–1500 at a resolution of 35K. Automatic gain control (AGC) targets of 1 x 106 and maximum injection times (IT) of 100 ms were selected. The 15 most intense precursor ions were selected for MS2 higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) fragmentation with an isolation width of 2.0 m/z and placed on an exclusion list for 40 s. Tandem mass spectra were acquired at a resolution of 17.5K in profile mode with an AGC target of 1 x 105, a maximum IT of 150 ms, a normalized collision energy (NCE) of 27, and a fixed lower mass at m/z 110.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative LC-MS/MS Analysis of BAP and Fosmidomycin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analyzed with an LC-MS/MS system comprised of a Waters NanoAcquity UPLC and a TSQ Vantage Triple Quadripole (Thermo Scientific). The liquid chromatography separation was performed on a Waters Acquity UPLC HSS C18 column (1.0×50 mm, 1.8 μm) with mobile phase A (0.1% triethylammonium acetate in water) and mobile phase B (acetonitrile). The flow rate was 50 μL min-1. The autosampler temperature was set at 10 °C. The injection volume was 5 μL. Mass spectra were acquired with negative electrospray ionization at the ion spray voltage of -3,000 V. The capillary temperature was 270°C.
For BAP, the LC gradient was as follows: 0–1 min, 0% B; 1–7 min, 0–100% B; 7–9 min, 00% B; 9–10.1 min, 100–0% B; 10.1–12 min, 0% B. Selective reaction monitoring followed the transition from parent ion to a metaphosphate fragment (179 to 62.9 m/z) using a collision energy of 38 eV.
For fosmidomycin, the LC gradient was as follows: 0–2 min, 0% B; 2–7 min, 0–20% B; 7–7.1 min, 20–100% B; 7.1–9 min, 100% B; 9–10.1 min, 100–0% B; 10.1–12 min, 0% B. Selective reaction monitoring followed the transition from parent ion to a metaphosphate fragment (182 to 79.0 m/z) using a collision energy of 41 eV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Peptide Separation and Identification by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptides were separated with a Waters NanoAcquity UPLC and emitted into a Thermo Q-Exactive HF tandem mass spectrometer. Pulled tip columns were created from 75 μm inner diameter fused silica capillary in-house using a laser pulling device and packed with 2.1 μm C18 beads (Dr. Maisch GmbH) to 300 mm. Trap columns were created from 150 μm inner diameter fused silica capillary fritted with Kasil on one end and packed with the same C18 beads to 25 mm. Buffer A was water and 0.1% formic acid, while buffer B was 98% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid. For each injection, 3 μl of each sample was loaded with 5 μL 2% B and eluted using the following program: 0–90 minutes
2%-35% B, 90–100 minutes 35%–60% B, followed by a 35 min washing gradient. Data were acquired using data-dependent acquisition (DDA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Proteome Turnover Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole liver tissue was homogenized, or mt fractions were isolated as previously described (Zhang et al., 2008 (link)). Both were processed, trypsin digested, and LC-MS/MS analysis performed with a Waters nanoAcquity UPLC and a Thermo Scientific LTQ Orbitrap Velos, as previously described (Hsieh et al., 2012 (link)). The raw data from MS/MS and extended supplementary files are available at https://chorusproject.org/pages/blog.html#/351.
The topograph software program (http://proteome.gs.washington.edu/software/topograph/)(http://proteome.gs.washington.edu/software/topograph/) was developed for the measurement of peptide isotopologue abundances from LC-MS/MS chromatograms and the calculation of peptide turnover rates (Hsieh et al., 2012 (link)). It allows the measurement of the proportion of the amino acid precursor pool that is labeled, which varied over time and condition (Fig. S12A). This information allows the correct calculation of percent of new synthesis for each peptide, which when plotted for 12 biological replicates over time (four time points) generated an exponential curve following first-order kinetics (Fig. S2A). Using a logarithmic transformation, the first-order protein turnover rate (slope) was determined by linear regression (Fig. S2B). Only peptides that uniquely mapped to a single protein were used for our measurements (see supplemental methods for details).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Tissue Homogenization and Proteomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues were homogenized in cold isolation buffer (250 mm sucrose, 1 mm EGTA, 10 mm HEPES, 10 mm Tris–HCl pH 7.4). These lysates were centrifuged at 800 × g for 10 min to get rid of the debris. Whole liver and heart tissues were homogenized and trypsin‐digested, and LC‐MS/MS analysis was performed with a Waters nanoAcquity UPLC and a Thermo Scientific LTQ Orbitrap Velos, as previously described (Hsieh et al., 2012).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!