The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Williams periodontal probe

Manufactured by Hu-Friedy
Sourced in United States

The Williams periodontal probe is a dental instrument used to measure the depth of periodontal pockets. It is designed with a calibrated scale to assess the extent of periodontal disease and monitor the progression or improvement of the condition.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

29 protocols using williams periodontal probe

1

Measuring Periodontal Pocket Depth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Bleeding Index (a modified Index of Saxton [12 (link)]) was determined, using the Williams periodontal probe in the evaluation (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL).
Pocket probing depth was measured and recorded at 6 sites per tooth (disto-buccal, buccal, mesio-buccal, mesio-lingual, lingual, and disto-buccal) using the Williams periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL).
The examiner was trained and calibrated in performing the clinical measurements before the examinations. For the assessment of measurement reproducibility, replicated periodontal measurements performed with a 2-day interval were used. At the site level, reproducibility was assessed, and the result was 0.82. The procedures were performed manually by a single experienced periodontist (R.S.).
Following the baseline examination, all patients underwent a non-surgical periodontal debridement procedure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Periodontal Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Assessment of each tooth was carried out at four sites (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, and oral) and periodontal parameters recorded included plaque index (PI),[18 (link)] gingival index (GI),[19 (link)] CAL and PD using Williams periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy).
Investigator blinding was ascertained, and interexaminer variability was prevented by involving only one investigator for recruitment of participants into different groups while another one handled the oral examination and periodontal treatment. To determine examiner reproducibility, clinical periodontal data recording on ten patients was done twice followed by calculation of the percentage of the sites examined where the scores were identical or within ± 1 mm. Assessment of the mean difference in the scores (with 90% accuracy) demonstrated that there was no systematic bias in the measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Periodontal Tissue Regeneration Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following clinical parameters were measured at the buccal surface of the teeth one week prior to surgery and at 2 and 6 months postoperatively using a periodontal probe (Williams Periodontal Probe, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA):

- Recession depth (RD): From the CEJ to the lowest point of migration of the gingival margin.

- Recession width (RW): Distance from the mesial to the distal aspect of the gingival margin at the level of the CEJ.

- Clinical attachment level (CAL): From the CEJ to the bottom of the gingival sulcus.

- Probing depth (PD): From the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Evaluation of Anterior Dental Characteristics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Review of the participants’ family and medical histories and examinations within and outside the mouth was completed prior to commencement of the procedure. An orthodontist conducted a facial and skeletal investigation to rule out the presence of bony maxillary excess or skeletal deformity. Additionally, the clinical attachment level, bleeding index, plaque index, and keratinized tissue width was measured as part of the periodontal examination. According to Marcuschamer et al., the presence of altered passive eruption was ruled out by measuring the dimensions and ratio of the maxillary anterior teeth as well as the Zenith from the first molar to the first molar in the adjacent quadrant to make sure all teeth fell within normal dimensions [21 ]. Based on a fresh series of intra-oral peri-apical radiographs taken from the first molar to the last tooth on the opposing side, the entire bone level was evaluated. To rule out a short lip as the cause, the length of the maxillary lip length at rest (MLLR) was measured. A whole dynamic smile was used to quantify the GD on each tooth from the first molar to the first molar at three different sites for each anterior tooth. Using William’s periodontal probe, all measurements were taken and recorded to the nearest millimeter (Hu-Friedy Co., Chicago, IL, USA). The three-time readings’ mean served as the foundation for the final measurement.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Periodontal Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Periodontal condition was assessed using the community periodontal index (CPI).[17 ] In total, 12 teeth were selected for periodontal examination (one incisor, one premolar, and one molar from each quadrant). Clinical recordings included presence of plaque percentage (plaque index [PI]),[18 (link)] percentage of sites BOP,[18 (link)] and probing pocket depth. WHO probe (CPI probe) was used for CPI measurements and Williams periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL) was used for other periodontal clinical indices. A single calibrated periodontist performed all clinical evaluations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Periodontal Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subsequent to saliva sampling, clinical periodontal recordings, including dichotomous (+/−) plaque index (PI), PD, CAL, and dichomotous (+/−) presence of BOP (occurring within 15 s after periodontal probing) were performed at 6 sites on each tooth present (except third molars) using a Williams periodontal probe (Hu Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA). CAL was assessed from the cement-enamel junction to the base of the probable pocket. All clinical measurements were performed by a single calibrated examiner (PG).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Periodontal Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), plaque index (PI) [34 (link)], and bleeding on probing (BOP) [35 (link)] were determined at six sites per tooth in the whole mouth, excluding third molars. The papilla bleeding index (PBI) was also assessed [36 (link)]. A manual William's periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL) was used for PD (millimeters) and CAL (millimeters) measurements. All measurements were performed by a calibrated examiner (OT). The intraexaminer reliability was high as revealed by an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.87 and 0.85 for PD and CAL measurements, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluating Oral Hygiene and Gingival Health

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The oral hygiene was assessed according to the Silness-Löe plaque index (PI) and the gingival health with the use of the Gingival Index (GI) on the six index teeth: 16, 12, 24, 36, 32, 44. The subject's oral hygiene was described as follows: poor (PI = 1.9–3.0), average (PI = 0.7–1.8), good (PI = 0–0.6). The gingival health was assigned as follows: healthy (GI = 0), mild gingivitis (GI = 0.1–1), moderate gingivitis (GI = 1.1–2), severe gingivitis (GI = 2.1–3) [23 (link), 24 ]. The probing depth (PD) measurements were performed using a Williams periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy Mfg. Co. LLC, Chicago, USA). Bleeding upon probing score (BOP%) was assessed as the percentage of sites bleeding after stimulation with a probe. The measurements of PD and BOP% were recorded on all teeth at six sites (buccal, distobuccal, mesiobuccal, lingual, distolingual, and mesiolingual) [25 (link)].
All subjects were examined by a calibrated pediatric dentist (N.W.). Calibration exercises were performed on healthy teenage patients, not included in the main study. The examiner was considered calibrated when she reached substantial correlation of repeated measurements and a considerable correlation with evaluations of her trainer (J.O.-S) (Cohen’s Kappa > 80).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Periodontal Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dichotomous plaque index (PI) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were recorded as present or absent and percentage values for whole mouth were calculated for each individual. The probing depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) values were recorded with a Williams periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL) and mean values were calculated for all participants in each study group. All parameters were obtained at six sites per tooth (mesial-buccal, mid-buccal, distal-buccal, distal-palatal, mid-palatal, and mesial-palatal) in all teeth present except the third molars in each patient.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Periodontal Assessment Calibration Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Williams periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to measure PPD and CAL and to record PI, GI, and BOP scores. The same examiner (F.O.D.) performed the periodontal assessments, group classification, sampling site selection, and GCF collection blind to the research design. Before the study, measurements were calibrated on ten randomly selected individuals. Measurements were made on two distinct occasions separated by a 2-day interval. Reproducibility was determined by whether the baseline measurements were within 10% of the measurements taken after two days at the mm level (30) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!