The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Acquity 1 class

Manufactured by Waters Corporation
Sourced in United States

The Acquity I-Class is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system designed for analytical separation and quantification of a wide range of chemical compounds. It features a modular design, allowing for customizable configurations to meet specific analytical requirements. The system delivers precise solvent delivery, accurate sample handling, and reliable performance to support advanced chromatographic techniques.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

26 protocols using acquity 1 class

1

Quantitative Analysis of Emerging Contaminants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analytical standards of the selected CECs and internal standards were supplied from Sigma-Aldrich (Spruce St., St. Louis, MO, USA) and had >99% purity. Acetonitrile, methanol, acetic acid, formic acid, ascorbic acid, and isopropanol were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Ontario, Canada).
Sample preparation, extraction, and CEC analyses were carried out according to Pulicharla et al.24 (link) Briefly, solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges (SiliCycle, Quebec) were used to extract the selected CECs. All extractions were stored in the dark at 4 °C until further analysis. The analyses were performed using an ultra-pressure liquid chromatography (UPLC) instrument (Waters Acquity I-Class (Milford, USA)) with a source mounted on a Xevo TQ-S Mass Spectrometer (Waters, Milford, USA). Chromatographic separations of selected CECs were performed with an Agilent Zorbax SB-C18 Rapid Resolution reverse-phase column (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.8 μm (Santa Clara, USA)). Three different gradient elution methods were developed for the same column and solvent composition to quantify the specific CEC being examined. The mass spectrometer was operated in Multiple Reaction Mode (MRM) to obtain analyte confirmation and quantification points.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Analysis of Paracetamol Metabolites in Urine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemical analysis of total urinary paracetamol and p-aminophenol was performed at the Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY. Specifically, 300 µL of 1 M ammonium acetate containing 30 U of β-glucuronidase (pH=5.5) was added to 500 µL of urine sample, followed by incubation at 37°C for 12 h. Target analytes were extracted thrice with ethyl acetate and were quantified by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (Acquity I Class; Waters, Milford, MA) coupled with an electrospray triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (API 5500; AB SCIEX, Framingham, MA) (UPLC-ESI-MS/MS). Separation of target analytes was carried by a Kinetex C18 (1.3 µ, 100A, 50 × 2.1 mm) column (Phenomenex; Torrance, CA) with a SecurityGuard guard column (Phenomenex) with positive ionization, multiple reaction monitoring mode of detection. Quality assurance and quality control parameters included procedural blanks, matrix spikes and duplicate analysis of samples. Labelled internal standards (d7-p-aminophenol and 13C2-15N- paracetamol) were spiked into all samples and quantification was by isotope dilution. The method limits of quantitation (LOQ) for p-aminophenol and paracetamol were 0.25 and 0.5 ng/mL, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Phytochemical Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PMFs content was determined using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC, Waters ACQUITYI-Class (Milford, MA, USA) equipped with a photodiode array detector, a quaternary solvent delivery system, and a column temperature controller). Chromatographic separations were performed on a 2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 µm ACQUITY UPLC HSS C18 column (Waters, MA, USA). The mobile phase consisted of water/formic acid (99.99%: 0.01%, v/v) (A) and methanol (B) at the rate of 0.4 mL/min, and the gradient profile was as a previous study reported [19 (link)]. All the prepared samples were tested in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

UPLC-MS Lipid Profiling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lipids were analyzed with a Waters Acquity i-Class coupled to a Waters Synapt G2Si adapted from Isaac et al.49 . Pellets were dissolved in 100 µl isopropanol:acetonitrile:water 2:1:1 and kept at 12 °C. 2 µl were injected onto a Waters BEH C18 (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.7 µm) column run with the following program: 60% A (A: 10 mM NH4CHOO, 0.1% formic acid, 60% acetonitrile, 40% water) hold for 2 min, to 35% A until 6.5 min, to 12% A until 12 min, to 1% A until 13 min, hold for 15 min, to 60% A until 15.5 min and hold to a final time of 20 min. B was 10 mM NH4CHOO, 0.1% formic acid, 10% acetonitrile, and 90% isopropanol. The column temperature was set to 55 °C with a flow rate of 300 µl/min. The source was operated at −1.5 kV, 150 °C, sampling cone and source offset were set to 30 and 80, respectively. Desolvation temperature was 500 °C with 600 l/h desolvation gas flow and 50 l/h cone gas flow as well as 6.5 bar nebulizer pressure. For data analysis, ProgenesisQI was used and searched against HMDB database 3.6 with a minimal score of 45 which corresponds relatively to the cut-off used in the GC/MS profiling following the same statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

LC-MS Analytical Workflow for Metabolite Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analyses were performed with a UPLC system (Acquity I class; Waters) and a BEH C18 column (2.1 mm × 5 cm) (flow, 0.25 ml/min). Samples were loaded onto the column in 5% solvent B (acetonitrile). After 2 min, a gradient from 5% to 90% solvent B was performed over 6 min. The UPLC system was coupled to an ESI Q-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Q Exactive; Thermo Scientific), operating either in the positive or negative ion mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of Herbicides and Safeners

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plant tissue samples were homogenized in 3× (w/v) acetonitrile:water (4:1) prior to analysis on a Waters Acquity I-class ultraperformance liquid chromatograph linked to a Waters Xevo TQ mass spectrometer. Herbicides and safeners were resolved on an Acquity C18 BEH (2.1×50 mm; 1.7 μm) column, at a flow rate of 0.7 ml min-1 using a gradient eluent system of (A) water plus 0.2% (v/v) formic acid and (B) acetonitrile. Initial conditions were 5% solvent B at 0 min, followed by a gradient of 5–95% solvent B between 1.1 min and 1.5 min, held at 95% B until 1.6 min, and then returned to initial conditions until 2.0 min. For MS detection, a collision energy of 30 V was used. The parent and transition ions were m/z 306.0 and m/z 206.9 for meticamifen, m/z 375.1 and m/z 254.1 for cyprosulfamide, and m/z 350.1 and m/z 90.9 for clodinafop-propargyl. In each case, the concentrations of the parent mass ions were determined by calibration using authentic reference standards.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Analysis of Pit Mud Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pit mud moisture levels were established by drying samples for 3 h at 115 °C. Pit mud pH values were established with a Mettler Toledo pH meter after diluting sample 1:4 (w/v) with dH2O for 3 h. Pit mud ammonium (NH4+-N) levels were established via extraction in 10% (w/v) NaCl at a 1:10 (w/v) ratio, after which concentrations were measured using a UV spectrophotometer. Acetic acid, butyric acid, and caproic acid were extracted using 15% methanol and quantified via gas chromatography (Agilent 7890, Santa Clara, CA, USA) as described previously [12 (link)]. Lactic acid (LA) levels were quantified via ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC, Acquity I-class, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) as previously reported [1 ]. Levels of K+, PO43−, soluble Mg2+, and soluble Ca2+ in air-dried pit mud were measured via extracting samples with ddH2O at a 1:10 (w/v) ratio, after which concentrations were measured as reported previously by Zhang et al. using an ion chromatograph (ICS5000+, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a conductivity detector (ICS-5000+-DC) and a CS12 column (Ion Pac, Thermo Fisher, 4 mm × 250 mm) [4 (link)]. The utilized injection volume was 25 μL, with methane sulfonic acid (20 mM) as a carrier fluid at a 1 mL/min flow rate, with a column temperature of 30 °C. Humus levels were determined as detailed previously by Shen [13 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comparative GlcNAc Anomer Analysis by MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Carbohydrates were re-suspended in LC-MS grade optima water and diluted to a working concentration of 10 μM in 0.1% formic acid. 18O labeling of the reducing end hydroxyl of GlcNAc was performed as described previously 37 (link). Samples were analyzed on a LTQ Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) by direct infusion at a rate of ~5 μL/min. The protonated precursor ion was subjected to CID using a range of normalized collision energies (CE) of 15 – 20. Full (MS1) scans were acquired followed by selection of the most intense fragment ions for further fragmentation with up to four rounds of MS/MS (MS4). All the multi-stage tandem MS experiments were performed in triplicate. Spectra were extracted and analyzed using Xcalibur software. MS analysis was coupled to liquid chromatography (Waters Acquity I-class) to resolve α/β anomers. 1 μL of a 10–50 μM solution of each was injected in pure water and resolved over a 2.1 × 150 mm 300 Å BEH amide column (Waters) using a gradient of 90%B to 55%B over 20 minutes (A: water with 0.1% formic acid; B: acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

UPLC-MS/MS Analysis of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analyzed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) using a Waters Acquity I-Class and a Waters Xevo TQD triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) with an electrospray ionization source. Instrument control and data acquisition were performed by Masslynx 4.1 software (Waters Corp.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Gb3 Isoform Profiling in Mouse Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A previously validated and published procedure49 (link) was used for the homogenization, extraction, and MS analysis of Gb3 isoforms in kidney, liver, spleen, and heart tissue samples from NSF mice. Briefly, tissue samples were homogenized in 400 μL of methanol at high speed (5 m/s) with five zirconium oxide beads (1.4-mm diameter, Omni International) for 45 s using a Bead Ruptor 12 homogenizer (Omni International). Samples were diluted with methanol to reach a concentration of 2.5 mg/mL. Diluted homogenates (1 mL) were spiked with 100 μL of Gb3[(d18:1)(C18:0)D3] (Matreya, 1 μg/100 μL) internal standard, saponified with KOH (1 M in methanol), and extracted with MTBE. The organic layers were evaporated to dryness and resuspended in 500 μL of methanol, 5 mM ammonium formate, and 0.1% formic acid. Separation of the Gb3 isoforms was performed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) (Acquity I-class, Waters) using a hollow structure section (HSS) T3 C18 column (Waters) and analyzed by tandem MS (Xevo TQ-S, Waters) in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode with positive electrospray ionization. Peak areas were measured using QuanLynx V4.1 software (Waters), and relative abundances of different Gb3 isoforms were expressed as their peak areas divided by the peak area of the internal standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!