The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using xbai restriction enzyme

1

Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis for Salmonella Typing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PFGE fingerprinting was performed using the XbaI restriction enzyme (ThermoScientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 1% SeaKem agarose gel, and the universal laboratory standard Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Braenderup (ATCC® BAA664™) according to the standard PulseNet protocol (http://www.pulsenetinternational.org). Electrophoresis was performed using the Bio-Rad laboratories CHEF DR-III system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) with a run time of 12 h and switch time of 5–40 s (https://www.cdc.gov/pulsenet/). Gels were stained with ethidium bromide. For isolates showing identical pulsotypes or that were untypable by XbaI, PFGE was repeated using the secondary enzyme AvrI. PFGE profiles were analyzed with the BioNumerics software version 7.6.1 (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium), with profiles assigned as different pulsotypes if three or more bands were different between the two of them. Pulsotypes were clustered based on the BioNumerics software analysis through dice correlation coefficients with an optimization of 1.5% and tolerance of 1.5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genotyping Household Escherichia coli Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the event that at least 2 household members were colonized in the same home, the genetic relatedness of isolates from hemodialysis patients, household contacts, and pets was determined using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), which was performed using the XbaI restriction enzyme (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) [15 (link)]. The cluster analysis was performed using BioNumerics software version 6.0, and dendrograms were generated by the unweighted pair group method using average linkages. A similarity cutoff of 80% was used to define genetically related strains.
Additionally, multiple-locus sequence typing (MLST) was performed on a representative sample of the isolates, according to the group generated by PFGE [16 (link)]. The sequence type and the clonal complex were assigned using the web database (https://pubmlst.org/). Finally, all Escherichia coli isolates were typified using the Clermont method to establish the phylogroups that represented the highest clinical risk in colonized people. For this, quadruplex PCR and 2 simple PCRs were performed to recognize the 7 defined phylogroups (A, B1, B2, C, D, E, and F) according to the previously described protocol [17 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

TALEN Targeting Spink5 Gene in Mouse

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TALENs targeting exon5 of Spink5 gene were designed using TAL Effector Nucleotide Targeter 2.0 (https://tale-nt.cac.cornell.edu/) [43 (link),44 (link)], assembled using the Golden Gate Cloning system[43 (link)], and cloned into the ELD-KKR backbone plasmid as described previously [45 (link)]. DNA binding domains of TALENs specific for the desired target site within Spink5 gene (Fig 1B) consisted of following repeats: NI-HD-HD-NN-HD-NI-NN-NG-NI-NN-NI-NG-NN-NG-NN-NI-NI-HD-NG (5´ TALEN-Spink5) and HD-NG-NN-HD-NG-NG-NG-NI-NG-NI-NN-NN-NN-NG-NI-HD-NG-HD-NI-HD (3´ TALEN-Spink5). Both TALEN plasmids were used for production of TALEN encoding mRNA as described previously [46 (link)]. 5 μl of TALEN mRNA (with total RNA concentration of 40 ng/μl) was mixed with 100 μM of targeting single-stranded oligonucleotide (Sigma-Aldrich; Fig 1B) and the final solution was microinjected into C57BL6/N-derived zygotes. Genomic DNA isolated from tail biopsies of newborn mice were screened by PCR (primers F1: 5´-CCTGTCTCTGCCTTCAGACC-3´ and R1: 5´-GGCTGTGGTAACTGTCCAAAA-3´) and subsequent RFLP analysis using XbaI restriction enzyme (Thermo-Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

PFGE Fingerprinting for E. coli Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PFGE fingerprinting was performed using the XbaI restriction enzyme (ThermoScientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 1% SeaKem agarose gel and the universal laboratory standard Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Braenderup (ATCC® BAA664™) according to the standard PulseNet protocol (http://www.pulsenetinternational.org). Electrophoresis was performed using the Bio-Rad laboratories CHEF DR-III system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) under the conditions set for non-O157 E. coli strains (https://www.cdc.gov/pulsenet/). Gels were stained with ethidium bromide. For samples showing identical pulsotypes or were untypable by XbaI, PFGE was repeated using the secondary enzyme AvrII (ThermoScientific, Waltham, MA, USA). PFGE profiles were analyzed with the BioNumerics software version 7.6.1 (Applied Maths, Belgium), with profiles assigned as different pulsotypes if three or more bands were different between the two of them. Pulsotypes were clustered based on the BioNumerics software analysis through dice correlation coefficients with an optimization of 1% and tolerance of 1%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genetic Relatedness of E. coli in Pregnant Women

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PFGE was performed using the Xba I restriction enzyme (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) for E. coli isolates (n = 35) identified in pregnant women according to the PulseNet protocol. Clonality and genomic relatedness were determined using the CHEF MAPPER (Bio-Rad, Austin, TX). The BioNumeric fingerprinting software (Applied Maths, Belgium) was used to analyze the profile and generate a dendrogram describing the relationship among the isolates. PFGE patterns were analyzed using Tenover's criteria (same cluster if the dice similarity index was >85% and < than 6 bands difference).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

PFGE Profiling and Pulsotype Categorization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PFGE was carried out using XbaI restriction enzyme (ThermoScientific, Waltham, MA, USA), according to the PulseNet standard protocol (https://pulsenetinternational.org/; https://www.cdc.gov/pulsenet/). Fingerprint analysis was performed using BioNumerics software version 7.6.1 (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium) and PFGE profiles were categorized as pulsotypes based on the criteria of a minimal difference of three or more bands between select isolates (42 (link)). Fingerprint clusters were inferred with the BioNumerics software based on the Dice correlation with optimization and tolerance values set at 1.5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

In Vitro Transcription of Hepatitis C Virus Genotypes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pJFH plasmid harboring the genotype 2a genome (kindly provided by Professor T. Wakita) and the intergenotypic recombinant pED435′UTR-NS2/JFH1T827A, T977S harboring the genotype 4a genome (kindly provided by Professor J. Bukh) were linearized using the XbaI restriction enzyme (ThermoScientific; USA) and purified using the phenol-chloroform technique. The full length viral RNA was in vitro transcribed using the T7 polymerase kit (MEGAscript, Ambion, Life Technologies; Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

TCR Construct Generation from NGS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nucleotide sequences from Next Generation Sequencing were used to design TCR constructs. Codon optimization and murinized constant chains were adopted (27 (link), 42 (link)), to avoid target αβ-TCR mispairing with endogenous TCRs expressed by the recipient T cells. Genes of TCR constructs were cloned into E.coli for amplification. Plasmid DNA containing the TCR genes were purified and linearized with XbaI restriction enzyme (Thermo Fischer Scientific) (27 (link)). Thereafter, mRNA was synthesized from linearized DNA using mMESSAGE mMACHINE T7 Ultra Kit (Life technologies), for TCR redirection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Standardized PFGE for E. coli non-O157:H7

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The macro-restriction fragment separation by PFGE was performed using the 24-h PulseNet standardized PFGE protocol for E. coli non-O157:H7 [60 ]. Digestion was carried out with 50 U of XbaI restriction enzyme (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rodano, Italy) for 2 h at 37 °C, after pre-digestion in buffer for 5–10 min at 37 °C. DNA fragments were resolved in 1% agarose gel in 0.5X TBE electrophoresis buffer at 14 °C, using the CHEF-DR III system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The runtime was 20 h, with a constant voltage of 6 V/cm, using a linear pulse ramp of 6.76–35.58 s. PFGE images of gels were captured using Gel Documentation System (Axygen Scientific, Torino, Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

PFGE Profiling of K. pneumoniae Phage Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to investigate the similarity between the K. pneumoniae strains sensitive to phages LASTA and SJM3, or between resistant offspring and parent Ni9 strains, bacterial DNA was analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) as previously described by Vukotic et al. [22 (link)] with minor modifications. Bacterial genomic DNA was digested with XbaI restriction enzyme (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!