The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss statistic software version 25

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS Statistics 25 is a comprehensive software package for statistical analysis. It provides a wide range of statistical procedures for data manipulation, visualization, and modeling. The core function of SPSS Statistics 25 is to enable users to analyze and interpret data, identify trends, and make informed decisions based on statistical insights.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using spss statistic software version 25

1

Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Tuberculosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were manually entered into SPSS Statistic Software version 25 by the two medical students. Random cross-checking was performed. Some questions required one answer and others allowed multiple responses. If respondents gave multiple responses on questions requiring only one answer, these cases were coded as missing data.
A knowledge-score from 0 to 11 was calculated from the nine knowledge questions. This score was normally distributed and the mean and standard deviation (SD) were used for analysis. A t-test was used to compare the knowledge-score between two groups, and an ANOVA was performed for multiple groups. To analyze whether knowledge score varied with answers on attitude questions, an ANOVA test was used and Chi square test was used as an alternative to ANOVA. The independent variables were: education, country of origin, gender, age, time in Norway, and personal experience with TB. The dependent variables were: knowledge score and attitude towards TB. P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Prognostic Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS statistic software version 25 was used. Histological characteristics were expressed as descriptive statistics. The x2 was used to investigate the association between CTCs and histopathological parameters. Survival rates were determined using the Kaplan–Meier method and were compared using the log‐rank test. A multivariate analysis of factors that might influence OS was performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. The results were presented as hazard ratios with 95% CI. All comparisons were two‐tailed. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All authors had access to the study data and had reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Analysis of Mortality Factors in Abdominal Trauma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IBM – SPSS statistic software version 25 was used for statistical analysis. Quantitative variables were described using means and standard deviation. Qualitative variables were described using frequencies and percentages. Quantitative variables between sub-groups were compared using the independent sample t-test or the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Comparison of ordinal data was done using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, while comparison of qualitative data was done using the Chi square test or alternatively using Fisher’s exact test (when expectancy < 5). A p–value equal to or less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
We used univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to evaluate parameters related to mortality due to abdominal trauma. We report the R-square measure, p-value, odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The variables that were found to be significant in univariate analysis (p-value less than or equal to 10%) were chosen for inclusion in the multivariate model using the backward selection method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Robotic Pet Interaction Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS statistic software version 25 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables are described as means ± SD. Sample size was calculated using G-Power59 (link). For a sample size of 83 individuals, if α  =  0.05 statistical power is 89%. All data underwent Kolmogorov-Smirnov analysis for normality of distribution. Parametric and nonparametric analyses of variance with corrected post hoc tests were used to evaluate the effect of experimental phase (T1/T2/T3/T4) and of group (PARO/Control group) on perceived happiness and on oxytocin levels and the effect of condition (Baseline/Touch/No-Touch in the PARO group and S1/S2/S3 in the control group) on pain ratings. Correlations between pairs of variables were calculated with Pearson’s r; p < 0.05 was considered significant. The Bonferroni correction was applied to multiple comparisons, where needed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Correlation Analysis of EBV Markers and Tumor Volume

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the markers (EBV oncoproteins and immune markers) and the tumor volume were numeric variable. A correlation test was done for all variables using Spearman correlation test. For graphical presentation, a scatterplot was used to display the correlation data of all tested variables. All data was processed with IBM SPSS Statistic Software version 25.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Nutritional Profiling of Beets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data including triplicate determinations for proximate analysis, antioxidant capacity, fatty acids, betanin, quantities of other polyphenols and TPCs of 2017 and 2019 were entered in Excel spreadsheet (WA, USA) and IBM SPSS statistic software version 25 (Chicago, IL, USA). Means and standard deviations were computed using both software, and multiple comparisons between means were performed by one-way analysis of variance test (ANOVA). Differences between means for proximate analysis, antioxidant capacity, fatty acids and TPC were considered significant at P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Limb Ischemia Risk Factors in ECMO Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All quantitative data are expressed as median (interquartile range) and were compared with the Mann–Whitney-U test. Differences between the study groups were assessed with the Chi-squared test of independence for nominal variables or the Fisher’s exact test as needed. Univariate logistic regression models were conducted to identify risk factors for venous thrombosis or limb ischemia. For limb ischemia, one model included parameters at the time of cannulation and the other model included parameters assessed during the ECMO therapy. The multivariat logistic regression model was adjusted for alle factors with a p values of less than 0.1 in the univariate analysis. In addition, a multivariate model for biochemistries according to limb ischemia was calculated. The cutoff points for NIRS were identified by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis using the Youden index. All reported p-values were two-sided, and a p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data entry and calculation were done using Microsoft EXCEL365 ProPlus (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, United States) and IBM SPSS Statistic software version 25.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cytokine and EV-miRNA Regulation of SIR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical differences among more than two groups were determined using one‐way ANOVA, or two‐way ANOVA, followed by the Bonferroni multiple comparison test. A value of P < 0.05 in two‐tailed test was considered statistically significant. All data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Single regression analysis and multivariable regression analysis were used to evaluate the relationships between SIR and the level of serum cytokines or EV‐miRNAs. SIR and either serum level of IL‐1β, IL‐6, and TNF‐α or EV‐miRNAs were included in variables. Regression analyses and Pearson's correlation test were performed using spss statistic software version 25.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and matlab 2018a (MathWorks Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

ECMO Cannula Performance Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics are presented as numbers (n), range, and fractions (%), and continuous data as median [interquartile range (IQR): 25%; 75%], as appropriate. Continuous data were compared with the Mann-Whitney U-test, and categorical data with the Chi2 test. A multivariate linear regression model was calculated, including all independent variables with p < 0.1 in the univariate model. Multivariate linear regression analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for Rf, including known possible risk factors such as ECMO and cannula specifics as well as hemodynamic and respiratory parameters as published previously (13 (link)). Linear quadratic regression models were used to assess associations between the Rf , QEC, and QEFF. A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data entry and calculation were done with Microsoft EXCEL365 ProPlus (Microsoft, USA) and IBM SPSS Statistic software version 25.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Propensity-Score Matching for Argatroban in ECMO

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Propensity-score matching was carried out by matching every patient who received Argatroban with a historical UFH patient to control for potential confounders such as age, sex, body mass index (BMI), sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA), the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) subgroup (pulmonary, non-pulmonary, post-trauma, and miscellaneous), resuscitation and days of mechanical ventilation before ECMO, and days on ECMO to account for potential imbalances between the Argatroban and the UFH group. More details are presented in the supplements.
All non-normally distributed quantitative data are expressed as median (interquartile range) and were compared with the Mann–Whitney-U test. Differences between the two study groups were assessed with the Chi-squared test of independence for nominal variables. Linear regression models were calculated to assess the association between the Argatroban plasma concentration and aPTT or SOFA. All reported p values were two-sided, and a p value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data entry and calculation were done using Microsoft EXCEL365 ProPlus (Microsoft, USA), IBM SPSS Statistic software version 25.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA), and the software package R (v 3.6.1 R Foundation for Statistical Computing).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!