The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using tracefinder v4

1

Quantitative and Qualitative Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were acquired
using Xcalibur 4.2 (Thermo Scientific) software. Quantification was
performed using the software TraceFinder v4.0 (Thermo Scientific).
The detection of at least two ions, one from an MS1 scan
and the other from a dd-MS2 scan, was used as identification
criteria for quantification.
Qualitative analysis was performed
using Compound Discoverer 3.3.0 (Thermo Scientific) to identify the
most abundant ions (Figure S8). First,
background peaks in the solvent, method blank, and field blank were
removed from consideration. Then, m/z observed for 103 compounds in OFR experiments in the negative mode
by Wu and Johnston20 (link) were used to create
an inclusion list of oVMS by Compound Discoverer 3.3.0. Reasonable
formulas were assigned based on the following criteria: (a) elemental
composition falls in the range of C0-30H0-90O0-30Si0-20N0-10, (b) theoretical m/z values fall
within the ±5 ppm of the observed m/z value, and (c) observed isotope distributions agreed within
50% with the theoretical isotope distributions for A+1, and A+2 peaks.
The most abundant isotopes of Si, including 28Si at 92.2%, 29Si at 4.7%, and 30Si at 3.1%, show a unique isotopic
pattern in the mass spectrum for oVMS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

UHPLC-MS/MS Analysis of EV Extract

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UHPLC-MS/MS analysis was performed according to previously described methods, with slight modifications to identify the constituents of the EV extract.13 (link),14 (link) The analysis was performed using a Dionex UltiMate 3000 system equipped with a Thermo Q-Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Chromatographic separation was achieved using an Acquity BEH C18 column (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 µm, Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) and gradient elution consisting of 0.1% (v v−1) formic acid in water (A) and acetonitrile (B).13 (link) The injection volume and flow rate were 3 μL and 0.25 mL min−1, respectively. MS analysis was conducted using the full-scan MS-ddMS2 method in both positive and negative ionization modes, using an electrospray ionization source. The MS/MS parameters were set as follows: capillary temperature, 320 °C; scan range, 100–1500 m z−1; full-scan MS1 resolution, 70,000; and data-dependent MS2 resolution, 13,500. Data acquisition and processing were carried out using the software Xcalibur v.3.2 and TraceFinder v.4.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The mass spectral patterns of the identified compounds were consistent with those reported previously.14 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

UHPLC-UV-HRMS Phytochemical Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phytochemical identification in QAE was performed by a Q-Exactive quadrupole Orbitrap mass spectrometer coupled with Thermo Dionex UltiMate 3000 system (UHPLC-UV-HRMS, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Chromatographic separation was carried out on a Waters Acquity BEH C18 column (2.1 mm i.d. × 100 mm, 1.7 µm) equipped with VanGuard XBridge BEH C18 pre-column (2.1 mm i.d. × 5 mm, 1.7 µm), with the oven temperature maintained at 40 °C. The mobile phase conditions for analysis were composed of 0.1% formic acid (v/v) in water (A) and acetonitrile (B), and the flow rate was maintained at 0.3 mL/min. Full MS and MS/MS spectrums were obtained via UHPLC-UV-HRMS that equipped with a heated electrospray ionization (HESI) interface. The data acquisition and analysis of all data obtained through this study were processed through Xcalibur v.4.2 and Tracefinder v.4.0 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific). In addition, the analysis method used in this study was referred and applied to the previously reported methods [21 (link)] and briefly described.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Analysis of Plasma Lipids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Relative quantitation of selected lipids in the human plasma pools was done using either TraceFinder v. 4.1 or SIEVE v. 2.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cambridge, MA). SIEVE analysis was as previously described (details in the supplemental section).
Peak areas of all potential LPEs and LPCs in plasma (based on the results of the interlaboratory report) was obtained using TraceFinder 4.1. In-brief, a compound library based on the precursor ion mass (mass error +/−5ppm) of all potential LPCs and LPEs was created within the software. TraceFinder data was then exported as a .csv file for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Acetyl-CoA in NRVMs and Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Acetyl-CoA was quantified in NRVMs under normoxia and hypoxia 48 hours after transfection with siUCP2 (n = 3 independent experiments) and in WT and UCP2KO mice after hypoxia treatment (n = 10 animals per group) by stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography–high resolution mass spectrometry, as previously described (41 (link), 42 (link)); additional details are available in Supplemental Methods. Data were integrated using Tracefinder v4.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) software, and additional statistical analysis was conducted by Prism v7.05 (GraphPad). Acetyl-CoA values were normalized to cell number and reported as pmol/1 × 105 cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative LC-MS/MS Dopamine Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After reconstitution in 60% acetonitrile spiked with internal standards, samples were analysed using HPLC and triple-quadruple mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry. Specifically, the system consisted of a TSQ system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in line with an electrospray source and a Vanquish (Thermo Fisher Scientific) UHPLC consisting of a binary pump, degasser and auto-sampler outfitted with a XBridge Amide column (Waters; dimensions, 3.0 mm × 50 mm and a particle size of 3.5 μm). The mobile phase A contained 95% (v/v) water, 5% (v/v) acetonitrile, 10 mM ammonium hydroxide, 10 mM ammonium acetate, pH 9.0; B was 100% acetonitrile. The gradient was as follows: 0 min, 15% A; 3 min, 45% A; 10 min, 60% A; 10.1–11 min, 75% A; 11.1 min, 15% A; 11.1–15 min, 15% A with a flow rate of 150 μl min−1. In positive/negative polarity switching mode, the capillary of the electrospray ionization source was set to 300 °C, with sheath gas at 35 arbitrary units, auxiliary gas at 5 arbitrary units and the spray voltage at 3.5 kV. The selective reaction of the protonated precursor ion and the related product ions were monitored. The transitions are listed as follows: dopamine (+) 154→137, dopamine_D4(+) 158→141. The peak area was integrated. Data acquisition and analysis were carried out using Xcalibur v.4.1 and Tracefinder v.4.1, respectively (both from Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Analysis of Opioid Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Retrospective analysis of the dataset was carried out to explore the presence of codeine, noscapine, acetylcodeine and morphine. Each analyte was assigned based on the m/z ratio of the [M + H]+ ion observed by inspection of the high resolution mass spectrum (acceptance criterion of +/−5 ppm mass deviation from theoretical m/z value) and comparison with samples extracted from blank paper. Extracted ion chromatograms were then produced for relevant analytes. The retention time and accurate monoisotopic masses (see Supplementary Data Table 1) of the compounds were used to create a processing method for rapid data analysis using TraceFinder v4.1 (Thermo Scientific, Bremen). Retrospective analysis of high resolution mass spectrometry (HR-MS) data is described elsewhere (27) . Peak assignment was confirmed by comparison with the GC–MS analysis performed at FSI of street heroin. All analyte signals were normalized to the heroin-D9 signal to obtain a ratio analyte:internal standard (A/IS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Analytical Data Processing and Visualization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data was analyzed in XCalibur v4.0 and/or Tracefinder v4.1 (Thermo). Statistical analysis and graph generation was conducted in GraphPad Prism v7.04 (GraphPad Software La Jolla, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Metabolomics by HPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hydrophilic metabolites were analysed by HPLC–MS/MS as described previously71 (link). Briefly, 20–100 mg of weighed tissue was homogenized in 1 ml of cold methanol in the TissueLyzer, centrifuged and the equivalent volume for 10 mg of tissue was dried by SpeedVac, reconstituted in 50% acetonitrile and applied to the HPLC–MS/MS analysis. Data acquisition and analysis were carried out using Xcalibur v.4.1 and Tracefinder v.4.1 software, respectively (ThermoFisher Scientific). Metabolite concentrations within each sample were normalized to total ion count. Data are represented as log2(fold change) relative to the control condition as indicated in the text and legends.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification of Cellular Acyl-CoAs by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were thawed and kept on ice throughout processing. Cell and fraction samples in 10% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid in water were sonicated for 12 × 0.5 s pulses, protein was pelleted by centrifugation at 17,000 ×g from 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was purified by solid-phase extraction using Oasis HLB 1cc (30 mg) SPE columns (Waters). Columns were washed with 1 mL methanol, equilibrated with 1 mL water, loaded with supernatant, desalted with 1 mL water, and eluted with 1 mL methanol containing 25 mM ammonium acetate. The purified extracts were evaporated to dryness under nitrogen then resuspended in 55 μl 5% (w/v) 5-sulfosalicylic acid in water.
Acyl-CoAs were measured by liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry. 5–10 μl of purified samples in 5% SSA were analyzed by injection of an Ultimate 3000 Quaternary UHPLC coupled to a Q Exactive Plus (Thermo Scientific) mass spectrometer in positive ESI mode using the settings described previously (Frey et al., 2016 (link)). Quantification of acyl-CoAs was via their MS2 fragments and the targeted masses used for isotopologue analysis are indicated in Table S3. Data were integrated using Tracefinder v4.1 (Thermo Scientific) software. Isotopic enrichment in tracing experiments was calculated by normalization to unlabeled control samples using the FluxFix calculator (Trefely et al., 2016 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!