The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

2 protocols using cd45ro pe

1

T cell Profiling and Exhaustion Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T cell sub-population profiling studies on days 14 and 21 were analyzed using CD3-PC7 (Beckman Coulter, 6607100), CD4-APC-A700 (Beckman Coulter, B10824), CD8-PC5.5 (Beckman Coulter, B21205), EGFR-A488 (R&D Systems, FAB10951G), CD45RA-ECD (Beckman Coulter, IM2711U), CD45RO-PE (Miltenyi Biotech,130-113-559), CD27-APC-A750 (Beckman Coulter, B12701), and CD62L-APC (Miltenyi Biotech, 130-113-617) antibodies by Cytoflex Flow Cytometer analysis. Exhaustion profiling studies on days 14 and 21 were analyzed using CD3-PC7 (Beckman Coulter, 6607100), CD4-APC-A700 (Beckman Coulter, B10824), CD8-PC5.5 (Beckman Coulter, B21205), EGFR-A488 (R&D Systems, FAB10951G), CD279 (PD1)-PE (Miltenyi Biotech, 130-117-384), CD366 (TIM3)—APC (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA, 17-3109-42), and CD223 (LAG-3)—APC-eFluor 780 (Invitrogen, 47-2239-42) antibodies by Cytoflex Flow Cytometer analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Testing of T cell responses was performed via stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with peptide libraries encompassing SARS-CoV-2 structural proteins as previously described [12 (link)]. Cells were then cultured for 10 days in 96-well plates with IL-4 (400 IU/mL) and IL-7 (10 ng/mL). On day 10, expanded viral specific T cells (VSTs) were harvested. 2 × 105 VSTs were plated in a 96-well plate and re-stimulated with SARS-CoV-2 structural proteins pooled pepmixes or actin (negative control) with CD28/CD49d (BD Biosciences) and anti-CD107a- Pe-Cy7 antibody. After 1 h of stimulation, brefeldin A (Golgiplug; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and monensin (GolgiStop; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) were added. Cells were then incubated for an additional 4 h. Cell viability was assessed using Live-Dead Aqua. Cells were surface stained with fluorophore-conjugated antibodies against CD3-BV785, CD4-BV605, CD8- BV421, TCRαβ-PerCP Cy5.5, TCRγδ- APC-Fire750, CCR7-FITC, CD45-RO-PE Dazzle, HLA-DR-Alexaflour700, and CD56-BV650 (Miltenyi Biotec; BioLegend). Cells were fixed, permeabilized with Cytofix/Cytoperm solution (BD Biosciences), and subsequently stained with IFN-γ-APC and TNF-α-PE (Miltenyi Biotec). All samples were acquired on a CytoFLEX cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). The gating strategy for analysis is presented in Supplemental Fig. 2 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!