The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using anti cav1

1

Co-Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed on ice in 20mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 1% Triton X-100, 100mM NaCl, 1mM Na3VO4, 10mM NaF, and 1% protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma). Soluble extracts were incubated for 2 h at 4°C with relevant antibodies: anti-HA (Roche Applied Science) and a negative isotype control mouse immunoglobulin (IgG) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-Cav-1 (Cell signaling), anti-Nox2 (BD), anti-Nox4 (Epitomics) or complexes precipitated with protein A/G agarose (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Western blotting was performed as described previously [32 (link)–36 (link)] using anti-HA (Roche), anti-Cav-1 (Cell signaling), anti-Cav-2 (Thermo Scientific), anti-Cavin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-Nox2 (BD, sigma, abcam), anti-Nox4 (Epitomics), and anti-GAPDH antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were plated and treated as described in section 2.3. After 24 h, culture medium was removed, and cells were washed with PBS. To obtain total protein extracts, cell lysis was performed chemically, with Lysis Buffer (5 mM Hepes pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10% Glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1.5 mM EGTA, 4 nM PMSF, 1% Aprotinine, 20 nM sodium pyrophosphate, 10 nM sodium orthovanadate), and mechanically, with a cell scarper.
Total protein samples were then clarified by centrifugation (13,000g, 15 min, 4 °C) and quantified using Bradford method.
10 μg of proteins were loaded in a polyacrylamide gel and after SDS-PAGE electrophoresis, western blotting was performed as described by antibodies manufacturers (anti-ERα, 1:1000, Santa Cruz, USA; anti-BRCA1, 1:50, Cell Signaling, USA; anti-CAV1, 1:1000, Cell Signaling, USA; anti-actin, 1:1000, Santa Cruz, USA; anti-LC3, 1:1000, Cell Signaling, USA; anti-Beclin1, 1:1000, Cell Signaling, USA; anti-rabbit, 1:2000, PerkinElmer, USA; anti-mouse, 1:2000, Chemicon, USA; anti-goat, 1:2000, Chemicon, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of GC Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GC and control samples were fixed with 4% formaldehyde solution and embedded in paraffin. Then, the sections (5 μm thickness) were incubated with 3% H2O2 for 10 min at room temperature to eliminate endogenous peroxidase activity. The sections were blocked with 10% goat serum at room temperature for 10 min. Then, the sections were incubated with primary antibodies, including anti-CAV1 (1 : 1000 dilution, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-VASP (1 : 1000 dilution, Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-VCAM1 (1 : 1000 dilution, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), at 37°C for 2 h. After the application of the secondary antibody (anti-rabbit IgG antibody, 1 : 10,000 dilution, Cell Signaling Technology), the sections were incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Subsequently, the DAB Plus Substrate Chromogen mixture was added, and the sections were incubated for 10 min.
The Human Protein Atlas (http://www.proteinatlas.org/) was used to validate the expression of the six genes in GC tissue.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis of Cellular Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total proteins were extracted using RIPA lysis buffer (Pierce, Invitrogen, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). The concentration of the extracted protein was determined by a BCA assay. The total protein was separated by 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), followed by transfer to a PVDF membrane (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), which was blocked with 5% skim milk for 1 h. The primary antibodies, anti-VCAM1 (1 : 1000 dilution, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), anti-VASP (1 : 1000 dilution, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-PICK1 (1 : 1000 dilution, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-FLNA (1 : 1000 dilution, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-COL4A2 (1 : 1000 dilution, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-CAV1 (1 : 1000 dilution, Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-GAPDH (1 : 1000 dilution, Cell Signaling Technology), were added and incubated with the membranes at 4°C overnight. Then, the membranes were washed with PBS buffer and incubated with anti-rabbit IgG antibody (1 : 10,000 dilution, Cell Signaling Technology) at 37°C for 45 min. An imaging system (Odyssey, LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) was used for the semiquantitative analysis. GAPDH was used as an internal control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescence Staining of Primary Liver Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary liver cells fixed in 4 methanol-free % PFA for 5 minutes were blocked and stained in IF buffer (1x PBS, 10 mg/ml BSA, 0.02% SDS, 0.1% Triton X-100). Primary and secondary antibodies was incubated for 1 hour at RT or overnight at 4°C with IF buffer washes between and after incubations. Cells were labeled with Hoechst 33342 (Life Technologies) for 5 minutes before mounting using VECTASHIELD (Vector Laboratories). Antibodies used: mAb414 (Covance or BioLegend); anti-Nup210 (Bethyl Laboratories, Inc.); anti-Pom121 (ThermoFisher Scientific); anti-Nup88 (22, BD Transduction Laboratories); anti-Nup107 (a kind gift from Martin Hetzer9 (link), The Salk Institute, La Jolla CA, USA); anti-Nup98 (39A3, Cell Signaling Technology); anti-Nup93 (F2, Santa Cruz BioTechnology); anti-Lamin A (Sigma Aldrich); anti-Lamin B1 (Abcam); anti-Cav1 (Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-Cav2 (65, BD Biosciences). Images were taken using a Leica SP8 confocal microscope and analyzed using the Leica Application Suite X software v3.1.5.16308, ImageJ v2.0.0-rc-54/1.51h (NIH), and Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 v12.1 x64.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Caveolins and Inflammatory Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the sections were blocked with 10% donkey serum with 0.3% Triton X-100 and 1% BSA for 2 h and incubated with anti-Cav1 (1:400, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), anti-p-p65 (1:200, ABclonal, MA, USA), anti-COX-2 (1:200, HuaBio, Zhejiang, China), anti-Collagen I (1:200, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and anti-IgG (1:400, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA) antibodies at 4 °C overnight, followed by incubation with secondary antibody (HRP conjugated goat anti-Rabbit IgG, 1:500, Beyotime, Shanghai, China) for 2 h. Sections were visualized with DAB (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) for 30 min and counterstained with hematoxylin. Evaluation of the immunocytochemistry was done by light microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunostaining and Western Blotting Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For western blotting, anti-beta-actin (1:1,000; cat. no. D6A8; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-CAV1 (1:1,000; cat. no. D46G3; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-SLO (1:1,000; Cosmo Bio), and anti-Nga (1:1,000; cat. no. 64-005; Bio Academia) antibodies were used as primary antibodies, and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG and anti-rabbit IgG antibodies (1:5,000; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) were used as secondary antibodies. For immunostaining experiments, anti-CAV1 (1:400; cat. no. D46G3; Cell Signaling Technology) and anti-GAS (1:250 or 1:500; cat. no. PAB13831; Abnova and cat. no. ab9191; Abcam) antibodies were used as primary antibodies, and anti-mouse, anti-rabbit, or anti-goat IgG conjugated with AlexaFluor-488 and AlexaFluor-568 (1:250; Molecular Probes/Invitrogen) or AlexaFluor-594 (1:250; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) antibodies were used as secondary antibodies. 4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; 1:1,000; Dojindo) was used to stain bacterial and cellular DNA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Analysis of KSHV LANA, CAV1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For IHC analysis, the following antibodies were used: anti-KSHV LANA (Advanced Biotechnologies Inc., Columbia, MD, USA), anti-CAV1 (Cell Signaling Technologies, Beijing, China), and anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Nantong, Jiangsu, China). Secondary antibodies used in this study were horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled goat anti-rat or anti-rabbit as appropriate (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Nantong, Jiangsu, China). DAB (3,3′-diaminobenzidine) Peroxidase (HRP) Substrate Kit (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, USA) was used to visualize staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Analysis of CAV1 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry staining of the paraffin sections was performed using the ChemMate EnVision system (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). The sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in ethanol. Antigens were retrieved by boiling the sections in 0.5 M EDTA (pH 8) using a pressure cooker for 10 min and under high pressure for 3 min. After cooling to RT, endogenous peroxidase was blocked by incubating the sections with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min. The sections were incubated with the primary antibody anti-CAV1 (1:400; D46G3 rabbit, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) at 4 °C overnight. After washing with TBS, the sections were incubated with EnVision Plus (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) at RT for 30 min. The signals were developed using 3, 3′-diaminobenzidine (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), and the sections were counterstained using hematoxylin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunofluorescence Staining of Primary Liver Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary liver cells fixed in 4 methanol-free % PFA for 5 minutes were blocked and stained in IF buffer (1x PBS, 10 mg/ml BSA, 0.02% SDS, 0.1% Triton X-100). Primary and secondary antibodies was incubated for 1 hour at RT or overnight at 4°C with IF buffer washes between and after incubations. Cells were labeled with Hoechst 33342 (Life Technologies) for 5 minutes before mounting using VECTASHIELD (Vector Laboratories). Antibodies used: mAb414 (Covance or BioLegend); anti-Nup210 (Bethyl Laboratories, Inc.); anti-Pom121 (ThermoFisher Scientific); anti-Nup88 (22, BD Transduction Laboratories); anti-Nup107 (a kind gift from Martin Hetzer9 (link), The Salk Institute, La Jolla CA, USA); anti-Nup98 (39A3, Cell Signaling Technology); anti-Nup93 (F2, Santa Cruz BioTechnology); anti-Lamin A (Sigma Aldrich); anti-Lamin B1 (Abcam); anti-Cav1 (Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-Cav2 (65, BD Biosciences). Images were taken using a Leica SP8 confocal microscope and analyzed using the Leica Application Suite X software v3.1.5.16308, ImageJ v2.0.0-rc-54/1.51h (NIH), and Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 v12.1 x64.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!