The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Oligo acgh chip on chip hybridization kit

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The Oligo aCGH/ChIP-on-chip Hybridization Kit is a laboratory equipment product designed for use in microarray analysis. The kit provides the necessary reagents and materials required to perform oligo-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and chromatin immunoprecipitation-on-chip (ChIP-on-chip) experiments.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using oligo acgh chip on chip hybridization kit

1

Genome-Wide Copy Number Analysis via Tiling Array

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genomes of haploid wild-type, cell-fusion, and mutant strains were analyzed using a tiling array (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Genomic DNA was extracted using spin columns (Genomic DNA Buffer Set No. 19060, and Genomic tip 500/G No. 10262; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). A. thaliana genomic DNA was extracted using spin columns (DNeasy Plant Mini Kit No. 69104; Qiagen). For tiling-array analysis, array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) was performed using a S. cerevisiae or A. thaliana custom microarray (designed by eArray; Agilent Technologies) for genome-wide copy number analysis. Genomic DNA (100 ng) was fluorescently labeled using the SureTag DNA Labeling Kit (Agilent Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Prior to hybridization, sample and control probes were incubated with the blocking agent and hybridization buffer contained in the Oligo aCGH/ChIP-on-chip Hybridization Kit (Agilent Technologies) at 95 °C for 3 min followed by 37 °C for 3 min. Hybridization was performed at 65 °C for 24 h in a microarray hybridization oven (Agilent Technologies) according to the manufacturer instructions, and the slides were washed with the Oligo aCGH/ChIP Wash Buffer Kit (Agilent Technologies). Array data were quantified and normalized using Feature Extraction Software (v.11.0.1.1; Agilent Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cancer CGH+ SNP Microarray Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Arrays used in the present study were designed to cover genomic regions bearing the cancer-associated genes by SurePrint G3 Cancer CGH+ single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) Microarray Kit, 4 × 180 K (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Instead of commercial DNA included within the kit, DNA isolated from the adjacent tissue from each patient was used as a source of reference DNA. For DNA labeling with Cy5 and Cy3 labels, Sure Tag Complete DNA Labeling enzyme kit was purchased (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA); Cy5 label was applied as a reference for adjacent tissues and Cy3 label for adenoma tissues. The input amount of DNA into the labeling was on average 850 ng. Hybridization was performed by using an Oligo aCGH/ChIP-on-chip Hybridization kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparative Genomic Hybridization Microarray Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Array-based CGH was performed by the manufacturer Takara Bio Dragon Genomics Center (Seta, Shiga, Japan). In brief, DNA (2 micro g) was fluorescent-labeled by random priming DNA synthesis in the presence of Cy3-dUTP (control group) or Cy5-dUTP (patient group) (Genomic DNA Enzymatic Labeling Kit; Agilent Technologies, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan). DNA labeling efficiency was estimated by spectrophotometry (Nanodrop ND-2000®) measuring optical absorbance at 260 nm for DNA, at 550 nm for Cy5, and at 649 nm for Cy3. Cy5- and Cy3-labeled DNAs were randomly paired, mixed, and hybridized to SurePrint G3 Human CGH Microarrays (1 M) in the presence of human Cot-1 DNA (Oligo aCGH/ChIP-on-chip Hybridization Kit, Agilent Technologies). Following hybridization for 24 h, microarray slides were washed according to the manufacturer’s instructions and immediately scanned on a DNA Microarray Scanner (Agilent Technologies). With the given limitation of the sample number, we took an advantage of the above direct comparison between case and control samples [57 (link)]. This approach allowed us to determine relative ratios of their gene dosages but not their absolute gene dosages. However this procedure decreased data deviations, compared with the CGH analysis utilizing two microarrays and reference genome DNA [30 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Array CGH Analysis of FFPE Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For all of the index patient’s tumour samples, array CGH was carried out using 500 ng genomic DNA from FFPE tumour samples using the Complete Genomic SureTag DNA Enzymatic Labelling Kit protocol and an OligoaCGH/ChIP-on-Chip Hybridization kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Normal kidney cortex DNA isolated from FFPE material from the index patient was used as reference. Labelled DNA samples were hybridized on the Agilent Microarray, Custom HD-CGH, 4 × 180 K (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. After scanning of the arrays, data were analysed with Nexus 7.5 software (BioDiscovery, El Segundo, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Array CGH Analysis of Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Array CGH was performed using the SurePrint G3 Human CGH Microarray Kit 8 × 60 k (Agilent Technologies Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). Labeling and hybridization were performed using the SureTag DNA Labeling kit and Oligo aCGH/ChiP‑on‑chip Hybridization kit (Agilent Technologies Inc.), according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Protocol v8.0). Genomic DNA derived from each cell line without acid or DCA was compared to a Human Male Reference DNA (Agilent). Genomic DNA of each cell line without acid or DCA was labeled with Cy5-dUTP and compared to a reference DNA, which was labeled with Cy3-dUTP (i.e., naïve CP-A vs reference). Genomic DNA of each cell line treated with acid and DCA was labeled with Cy5-dUTP and compared to that of corresponding cell line treated without acid or DCA, which was labeled with Cy3-dUTP (i.e., CP-A treated with acid and DCA vs naïve CP-A). After washing the array slides, they were scanned using an Agilent Technologies Microarray scanner, and the resulting data were analyzed using the Agilent Cytogenomics software program v.5.1. (Agilent Technologies Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Methylated regions of the genome (controls and treated TH-1 cells) were immunoprecipitated using a 5-methylcytidine monoclonal antibody (Eurogentec, Belgium) following an Agilent microarray analysis of methylated DNA immunoprecipitation protocol. Immunoprecipitated DNA (using Cy5-dUTP) and non-immunoprecipitated DNA (using Cy3-dUTP) from the same sample were differently labeled using SureTag DNA Labeling Kit (Agilent Technologies, USA). Samples were purified using column purification (SureTag DNA Labeling Kit, Agilent Technologies, USA), mixed, and prepared for hybridization by incubation at 95°C for 3 min, followed by 37°C for 30 min using Oligo aCGH/ChIP-on-chip Hybridization Kit (Agilent Technologies, USA). The mix of labeled DNAs was then hybridized onto the Agilent custom methylation microarray 2 × 400 K, design ID 086060 (Agilent Technologies, USA), containing a combination of probes from designs ID 023795 and ID 014791. After 40 h hybridization at 67°C by rotating slide at speed 20 rpm in hybridization oven (Agilent Technologies, USA), slides were washed (Agilent Oligo aCGH/ChIP-on-Chip Wash Buffer Kit, Agilent Technologies, USA) and scanned at resolution 3 μm using SureScan Microarray Scanner (Agilent Technologies, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Array-CGH Analysis of MUG-Chor1 Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Array-CGH analysis of MUG-Chor1 samples was performed using SurePrint G3 Human CGH Microarrays 8×60K (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) with the Bioprime Array CGH Genomic Labeling System (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA) according to the manufacturers' manual. In brief, 250 ng of both WGA4 amplified sample and WGA4 amplified reference DNA were differentially labeled with dCTP-Cy5 and dCTP-Cy3 (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK), respectively. Subsequently, DNA was purified with Amicon Ultracel-30 filters (Millipore, Billerica, USA) and simultaneously hybridized onto the 60 k microarray slides at 65°C for 24 h using the Oligo aCGH/ChIP-on-chip Hybridization kit (Agilent Technologies). After hybridization, the arrays were washed and scanned (Agilent Technologies) as recommended by the manufacturer. The data was analyzed with Agilent Genomic Workbench Lite Edition 6.5.0.18 (Agilent Technologies). Software settings for analysis were as follows: ADM-2 algorithm, threshold 6.5, with at least three consecutive oligos and with an absolute log ratio of 0.35. Fuzzy zero was switched off and centralization was set to the threshold 6.0 with a bin size of 10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!