The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Bravo automated liquid handling platform

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The Bravo Automated Liquid Handling Platform is a versatile laboratory automation solution designed to perform precise and accurate liquid handling tasks. The platform is capable of aspirating, dispensing, and mixing a wide range of liquid volumes across multiple sample types and microplate formats.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

69 protocols using bravo automated liquid handling platform

1

Single-cell genome profiling of HeLa cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa cells were incubated in mild lysis buffer, and single G1 nuclei were sorted into 96‐well plates, using a Hoechst/propidium iodide double staining. Illumina‐based library preparation was performed as described previously (van den Bos et al., 2016), in an automated fashion using a Bravo automated liquid handling platform (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Single‐cell libraries were pooled and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 500 sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Sequencing data were analyzed using aneufinder software as described previously (Bakker et al., 2016). Per sample and per bin, the modal copy number state of siSCR control‐treated cells was determined, and bins that deviated from the modal copy number state were identified. The genomic instability scores were assessed per cell, by determining the fraction of bins that deviate from the modal copy number for that sample. All sequencing data have been deposited at the European Nucleotide Archive under accession no. PRJEB31290.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Single-cell RNA-seq of Sorted Hepatocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were sorted with SORP-FACSAriaII machine using a 130 μm nozzle. Dead cells were excluded on the basis of 5 μg/ml propidium iodide (Invitrogen) incorporation. Cells adhering to each other (i.e., doublets) were eliminated on the basis of pulse width. We used a 25,000-250,000 FSC-A gate. For three of the mice a #1.5 ND filter and was used to enrich for hepatocytes, whereas for the fourth mouse a #1 ND filter was used to enrich for non-parenchymal cells. Hepatocytes were sorted into 384-well cell capture plates containing 2 μl of lysis solution and barcoded poly(T) reverse-transcription (RT) primers for single-cell RNA-seq17 (link). Barcoded single cell capture plates were prepared with a Bravo automated liquid handling platform (Agilent) as described previously17 (link). Four empty wells were kept in each 384-well plate as a no-cell control during data analysis. Immediately after sorting, each plate was spun down to ensure cell immersion into the lysis solution, snap frozen on dry ice and stored at -80°C until processed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative PCR for Host Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative PCR for the analysis of host gene expression was performed in 384-well plates in a final volume of 10 μL using a Bravo automated liquid handling platform (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) and a ViiA 7 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) at the GeT-TRiX platform (GenoToul, Genopole, Toulouse, France). Mixes were prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions (iTaq SYBR green PCR; Bio-Rad) with 2 μL of 1:20 diluted cDNA and a final 0.5 μM concentration of each primer. Quantification of influenza virus nucleic acid load in tissues was performed in 96-well plates with a 10-μL final volume according to the manufacturer’s instructions (iTaq SYBR green PCR; Bio-Rad), along with 2 μL of cDNA and a final 0.5 μM concentration of HA-specific primers. qPCR was performed on a LightCycler 96 instrument (Roche). Relative quantification was carried out by using the threshold cycle (2−ΔΔCT) method. RNA levels were normalized with GAPDH mRNA levels. Primer sequences are described in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Single-cell isolation and sorting for RNA-seq

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cells and clumps were sorted with SORP-FACSAriaII machine with BD FACSDIvaTM software (BD Biosciences) using a 100 μm nozzle. For clumps sorting, dead cells were excluded using the Zombie green staining and clumps were sorted based on Hoechst histogram (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Fig. 18a). For single cell sorting, dead cells were excluded on the basis of 500 ng/ml Dapi incorporation. Sorted cells were negative for CD45 and positive for Epcam (Supplementary Fig. 18b). To enrich for enteroendocrine cells, cells were gated on CD45- Epcam+ CD24+. Since tuft cells express CD4517 (link), to enrich for those, cells were gated only on Epcam+ CD24+ (Supplementary Fig. 18c).
Cells and clumps were sorted into 384-well MARS-seq cell capture plates containing 2 μl of lysis solution and barcoded poly(T) reverse-transcription (RT) primers for single-cell RNA-seq. Barcoded single cell capture plates were prepared with a Bravo automated liquid handling platform (Agilent) as described previously16 (link). Four empty wells were kept in each 384-well plate as a no-cell control during for data analysis. Immediately after sorting, each plate was spun down to ensure cell immersion into the lysis solution, snap frozen on dry ice and stored at −80 °C until processed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Luciferase Assay for Compound Screening

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Luciferase assay screening was conducted as previously reported (26 (link)). Briefly, 4000 A4wt cells per well were seeded in white opaque 384-well plates (PerkinElmer, Sweden) using a multidrop microplate dispenser (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The following day, cells were initially treated with IL6 and its soluble receptor (sIL6R, PeproTech Inc.) at 50 and 100 ng/ml, respectively, and after 1 hour of incubation, test compounds were added. After an additional 5 hours of incubation with compounds, steadylite plus reporter gene assay system (PerkinElmer, Netherlands) was added to the cells, and luminescence per well was measured on a Spark 10M microplate reader (Tecan Group Ltd.).
Compound analogs were either purchased from Enamine Ltd. or synthesized in-house. Compounds were serially diluted and consecutively added to the cells using a Bravo Automated Liquid Handling Platform (Agilent Technologies) or by hand. BP1-102 (Merck Millipore) was used as a positive control. All cytokines and compounds were stored according to the recommendations from the manufacturers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Single-cell RNA-seq of Sorted Hepatocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were sorted with SORP-FACSAriaII machine using a 130 μm nozzle. Dead cells were excluded on the basis of 5 μg/ml propidium iodide (Invitrogen) incorporation. Cells adhering to each other (i.e., doublets) were eliminated on the basis of pulse width. We used a 25,000-250,000 FSC-A gate. For three of the mice a #1.5 ND filter and was used to enrich for hepatocytes, whereas for the fourth mouse a #1 ND filter was used to enrich for non-parenchymal cells. Hepatocytes were sorted into 384-well cell capture plates containing 2 μl of lysis solution and barcoded poly(T) reverse-transcription (RT) primers for single-cell RNA-seq17 (link). Barcoded single cell capture plates were prepared with a Bravo automated liquid handling platform (Agilent) as described previously17 (link). Four empty wells were kept in each 384-well plate as a no-cell control during data analysis. Immediately after sorting, each plate was spun down to ensure cell immersion into the lysis solution, snap frozen on dry ice and stored at -80°C until processed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

High-Throughput Screening of TEAD-LUC Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2,500 293A-TEAD-LUC cells were plated in 50 μL of growth medium without FBS in white 384-well plates (Corning) and allowed to proliferate for 48 h until fully confluent. 100 nL of compound solvated in DMSO was then transferred to each well using a Bravo Automated Liquid Handling Platform (Agilent) affixed with a pintool head (V&P Scientific). For TEAD-LUC activity assays, 30 μL of BrightGlo reagent solution (Promega, diluted 1:3 in water) was added to each well after 24 h of compound treatment. For cytotoxicity assays, 30 μL of CellTiter-Glo reagent solution (Promega, diluted 1:6 in water) was added to each well after 24 h and 72 h of compound treatment. Luminance values were recorded on an Envision plate reader (Perkin Elmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Supported Lipid Bilayer Formation and Protein Deposition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bilayer formation and protein deposition was performed as previously described[19 (link)] except for the following changes. A custom 384 well microtiter plate (Biodesy Delta Read Plates) was used to form supported lipid bilayers for protein deposition. A Bravo automated liquid-handling platform (Agilent) was used for bilayer deposition, buffer washes, and protein deposition during sample preparation.
For MLKL experiments, the assay buffer was 20mM HEPES, pH 8.0, 200mM NaCl, 0.005% Tween-20. MLKL protein was deposited at a final concentration of 1μM in each well and allowed to incubate on the Ni-NTA surface overnight at 4°C. After overnight incubation, unbound protein was removed by washing with assay buffer plus 1% DMSO. Plates were then allowed to equilibrate for 30 minutes at room temperature before beginning compound injections.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

NF-κB Gene Targeted Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We applied HaloPlex technology (Agilent Technologies) for targeted enrichment. For the discovery cohort, an earlier version of the current HaloPlex protocol was used. Biotin-labeled probes were designed for 18 NF-κB genes that targeted all coding exons with a high coverage (Tables S1 and S6). In brief, genomic DNA was fragmented using a combination of restriction enzymes. Biotin-labeled HaloPlex probes were hybridized to the target DNA and acted as template for a second universal DNA oligonucleotide, which contains primer sites, sequencing barcodes, and adapter sequences. The target DNA and the hybridized molecules were captured using streptavidin-labeled magnetic beads and circularized after a ligation reaction. The circularized DNA was amplified using universal primers. For the validation cohort, we took advantage of the automated HaloPlex protocol (http://www.chem.agilent.com/Library/usermanuals/Public/G9900-90020.pdf) using a Bravo Automated Liquid Handling Platform (Agilent Technologies). The libraries were subsequently sequenced using a HiSeq 2000 sequencing system (Illumina).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

High-Throughput Screening of Anti-Cancer Drugs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells (5000/well) were seeded in duplicate in a 384-well culture plate in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% FBS and cultured overnight at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Ten micromolar of 119 FDA-approved anti-cancer drugs (Selleck Chemicals) were added to the cells, using the Bravo Automated liquid handling platform (Agilent technologies), and cell viability was assessed 72 h later with a CCK-8 kit.
To determine the cell sensitivity to the drugs, serially diluted anti-cancer drugs in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% FBS were added to cells and cultured for 72 h. Cell viability was then assessed by CCK-8. IC50 values were calculated by drawing four-parameter curve fitting using GraphPad Prism (version 7, Graphpad Software). The study was performed in duplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!