The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using itraq labeling

1

iTRAQ Labeling and Protein Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The iTRAQ Labeling procedures were conducted according to the manufacturer's instructions (AB SCIEX, Shanghai, China). 100ug proteins of each group were precipitated with fivefold acetone at -20℃ for 1 h. Then, the mixture was centrifuged for 10min at 12,000 x g at 4℃. After removal of the suspension, the protein was dried using a vacuum centrifuge. Then, the protein was resuspended in 50μl dissolution buffer, reduced by 4μl reducing reagent for 1 h at 60℃, and then alkylated by 2μl cysteine blocking reagent for 10 min at room temperature. Protein samples were then digested with 50μl trypsin (50ng/μl) at 37℃ for 12 h. Tryptic peptides were dried by vacuum centrifugation and labeled with the iTRAQ regents at room temperature for 2 h. Afterward, 100μl distilled water was added to stop the reaction, the samples were mixed with equal amounts, and then the dried samples using a vacuum centrifuge were left for isolation and identification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Peptide Desalting and Quantification for iTRAQ Labeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptide mixtures were desalted using in-house-packed stage tip columns composed of two C18 membrane disks (Empore 3 M, Bellefonte, USA) and porous R2/R3 reversed-phase resins (Thermo Fischer Scientific). In brief, samples were acidified to pH ~ 2 before peptides were applied to 0.1% TFA pre-equilibrated columns, washed with 0.1% TFA, and eluted using 70% ACN, 0.1% TFA. The eluted peptides were vacuum centrifuge dried before being reconstituted in 0.05 M TEAB prior to amino acid analysis (AAA) to measure peptide concentration. AAA was performed by lyophilizing a small aliquot of peptide sample and adding 200 µL hydrolysis buffer (6 M HCl, 0.1% phenol, 0.1% thioglycolic acid), filling with argon and subsequently evaporating under vacuum. Samples were then incubated at 110 °C ON. After hydrolysis, the amino acids were analyzed on a Biochrom30 amino acid composition analyzer (Cambridge, UK) as described in38 (link), and 20 µg of peptides from each sample were then transferred to new Eppendorf tubes, vacuum dried, and re-dissolved in 0.5 M TEAB prior to iTRAQ labeling (AB Sciex), as described by the manufacturer. After iTRAQ labeling and pooling, samples were vacuum centrifuge dried, re-dissolved in 0.1% TFA, and desalted on in-house-packed R2/R3 stage tip columns, as previously described.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Chondrocyte Secretome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Conditioned media (CM) obtained from 3 different samples were analyzed independently. CM were collected, centrifuged and filtered using a 0.2 μm filter to ensure removal of any dead cells. Supernatant of each dish (6 mL) was concentrated to a final volume of 250 μl with Amicon ultrafiltration units (5 kDa MWCO, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and then cleaned up by acetone precipitation. Protein pellets were dried in air and then resuspended in 25 μl Dissolution Buffer. Protein concentrations were determined by Bradford assay (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Equal amounts of chondrocyte secreted proteins (20 μg) from each condition were reduced, alkylated, and digested with trypsin. Then iTRAQ labeling was performed according to the supplier's instructions (ABSciex, Foster City, CA, USA). The samples were labeled as follows: controls, 114; CS, 115; GH, 116; CS + GH, 117. iTRAQ-labeled peptides were mixed and desalted using reversed phase columns (Pierce C18 Spin Columns, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) prior to liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis (Fig. 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Plasma Proteome Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experimental strategy consisted of the following: (1) immunodepletion of the 14 more abundant plasma proteins [23 (link)]; (2) a discovery phase using two different, complementary, and robust proteomics techniques: two-dimensional fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE; GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA) (n = 18) and isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) labeling (AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA) followed by liquid chromatography-tandem MS (n = 16) [24 (link)]; and (3) a verification phase in an independent cohort of 20 patients by two different orthogonal techniques: Western blotting and selected reaction monitoring (SRM) [25 (link)] (Figure 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Peptide Quantification by iTRAQ Labeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Seventy-five micrograms of peptides from each sample were used for iTRAQ labeling (AB SCIEX, Darmstadt, Germany). The labeling procedure was conducted in line with the manufacturer’s protocol with some modifications. After reconstitution in dissolution buffer, the digested peptides were incubated with a specific iTRAQ for 3 hours at room temperature. The labeled samples were homogenously mixed and dried by SpeedVac before they were redissolved in 60 μL of 5 mM ammonium formate. Next, 50 μL of the sample was prefractionated by high-pH reverse-phase liquid chromatography on an ACQUITY UPLC H-Class Bio system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA), and, finally, 10 consolidated fractions were obtained. The labeled peptides in each fraction were dried and redissolved in 30 μL of 2% acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid for LC-MS/MS analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Proteomic Analysis of EV-Treated H69 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
H69 cells were cocultured with the quantity of EVs that corresponded to 1.2 µg/mL of ES protein in PBS for 30 minutes, 3 hours, and 16 hours. Cells were washed using PBS containing protease inhibitor cocktail and lysed in 5 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 1% Triton X–100, and 40 mM Tris (pH 7.4). Each sample was ground with a TissueLyser II (Qiagen) and centrifuged at 12 000g for 20 minutes. The protein supernatant was precipitated with cold methanol and centrifuged at 8000g. Air-dried pellets were redissolved in 0.5 M triethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB)/0.05% SDS and then centrifuged at 12 000g. Samples were resuspended in 0.5 M TEAB prior to reduction, alkylation, digestion, and iTRAQ labeling (AB Sciex) and then were analyzed on a 5600 TripleTOF mass spectrometer as described previously [24 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Proteomics of Cytokine Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were collected, lysed with urea 6 M and thiourea 2 M and cleaned up by acetone precipitation. Protein pellets were dried at air and then resuspended in 30μl of Dissolution Buffer (0.5 M triethylammonium bicarbonate at pH 8.5) (AB Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA). Protein concentration was determined by using NanoDrop ND1000 (Thermo Scientific). Then, 50 µg of proteins from each condition were reduced, alkylated, and digested with trypsin. Then iTRAQ labeling was performed according to the supplier's instructions (ABSciex, Foster City, CA, USA).
The samples were labeled as follows: 113 (basal condition), 114 (IL-1β), 115 (Cel 1µM + IL-1β), 116 (VA692 1µM + IL-1β), 117 (basal condition), 118 (IL-1β), 119 (Cel 1µM + IL-1β), 121 (VA692 1µM + IL-1β). iTRAQ-labeled peptides were mixed and desalted using reversed phase columns (Pierce C18 Spin Columns, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) prior to liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Synaptoneurosomal Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein extraction, iTRAQ labeling and tandem mass spectrometry analysis was carried out at the Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS) Proteomic Service. Briefly, synaptoneurosomal proteins were extracted using a lysis buffer that contained SDS, supplemented with protease inhibitors (Sigma), phosphatase inhibitor cocktails I and II (Sigma), and benzonase (Sigma). After incubation for 1 h, the samples were centrifuged for 15 min at 14,000 rpm in a refrigerated bench-top microfuge . Proteins present in the supernatant were quantified following iTRAQ labeling (AB ScieX) essentially following the manufacturer's instructions, omitting the protein precipitation step in order to conserve minority proteins. 50 g of proteins were labeled for each experimental condition in duplicates (8-plex). Data were analyzed using the Proteome Discoverer 1.4 software (Thermo), setting the False Discovery Rate (FDR) of both proteins and peptides identification to be less than 0.01.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Tear Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aliquots of lyophilized tear protein extracts (25 lg total protein) were used for isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) labeling (AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA) followed by LC-MS/MS analysis as previously described. 18 Liquid chromatography was performed using a commercial LC system (Dionex Ultimate 3000 Nano LC; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and mass spectrometry with a commercial device (TripleTOF 5600; AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA) according to procedures described elsewhere. 18
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!