The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

27 protocols using spectrum green dutp

1

Mapping Plasmid Integration in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were first arrested in metaphase with KaryoMAX Colcemid solution (Gibco) and then harvested after a treatment with a hypotonic salt solution. Two sets of probes were used to localize plasmid integration site. RP23-336p21 and RP24-129K5 specific bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) that map to the E3 band of the mouse chromosome 7 (Human BAC Clone Library, Children’s Hospital Oakland Research Institute [CHORI]) were used as controls. PGK-hFANCA transgene integration site was detected using as probe the DNA from the plasmid vector. Following the manufacturer’s specifications, BACs DNA was directly labelled by nick translation (Vysis, Abbott Molecular) with SpectrumGreen-dUTPs, whereas plasmid DNA was labelled with SpectrumOrange-dUTP (Vysis). The probes were blocked with Cot-1 DNA and DNA sheared salmon sperm (Vysis) to suppress repetitive sequences, and hybridized overnight as 37 °C onto metaphase spreads. After post-hybridization washes, the chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI in Vectashield mounting medium (Vector Laboratories). Cells images were captured using a cooled charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (Photometrics SenSys camera) connected to a computer running a Chromofluor image analysis system (CytoVision, Leica Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multicolor FISH Using BAC Probes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A customized combination of BAC clones RP11-66F9 (abbr. F9), RP11-505B16 (abbr. B16) and RP11-47L18 (abbr. L18) was used. Probes were labelled with Aqua-dUTPs (Abbott Molecular), Spectrum Green-dUTPs (Abbott Molecular) and Spectrum Orange-dUTPs (Abbott Molecular), respectively, as described previously for the fiber-FISH assays.
Probe combinations were prepared by mixing 200 ng of each labelled DNA probe with 4 μg of Cot1 competitor DNA (Invitrogen) per probe. The probe hybridization mixture was dried on a heating block at 42 °C and the pellet was resuspended in 5 μl of LSI/WCP Hybridization Buffer (Abbot Molecular).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Preparation and Validation of Sex Chromosome Probes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animal collection, microdissection, preparation of sex chromosome specific probes and validation of probes were described in our previous studies 18, 19, 20 . Briefly, we labelled sex chromosome probes by nick translation incorporating SpectrumGreen-dUTP (Abbott, North Chicago, Illinois, USA) or SpectrumOrange-dUTP (Abbott) and precipitated with 20 µg glycogen. After decantation, labeled probe pellets were resuspended in a 15 µl hybridization buffer. The resuspended probe mixture was hybridized with a drop of metaphase chromosome suspension fixed on a glass slide, covered with coverslips, and sealed with rubber cement. The slide was then denatured on a hot plate at 68.5°C for 5 min and was hybridized overnight in a humid chamber at 37°C for two days. The slides were then washed first with 0.4×SSC, 0.3% IGEPAL (Sigma-Aldrich) at 55°C for 2 min followed by 2×SSC, 0.1% IGEPAL for 1 min at room temperature. The slides were dehydrated by ethanol series and air-dried and then mounted with anti-fade medium Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, California, USA) containing 20 µg/ml DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Chromosome Painting and Stem Cell Probes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole chromosome painting probes for BTA5, BTA12 and BTA23 were obtained by laser microdissection and labelled with Spectrum Orange-dUTP (Abbott Laboratories) by DOP–PCR. Locus specific probes (NANOG—CH240-164H1, CDX2—CH240-301P20, OCT4—CH240-470G19) were obtained from BAC clones (CHORI-240) and labelled with Spectrum Green-dUTP by nick translation (Abbott Laboratories).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for X-chromosome Inactivation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Xist and Huwe1 probes were described previously (Chow et al., 2010 (link)). Tsix was detected with a DXPas34 plasmid (Debrand et al., 1999 (link)). Approximately 1 × 105 of F1-21.6 ESCs were plated on gelatin-coated coverslips and incubated for 24 to 48 hr. After fixation and permeabilization, coverslips with cells were washed and stored in 70% EtOH at −20°C. Then the coverslips were dehydrated in 80%, 95%, and 100% EtOH (5 min each) and briefly air-dried. FISH probes were labeled by nick translation (Abbott) with Spectrum Red-dUTP or Spectrum Green-dUTP following the manufacturer's instructions. Labeled probes were precipitated in the presence of salmon sperm (10 μg) and Cot-1 DNA (3 μg), denatured and competed with Cot-1 DNA for 45 min at 37°C. Cells were then directly hybridized with labeled probes at 37°C overnight. Next, coverslips were washed three times in 50% formamide/2 × SSC followed by three washes in 2 × SSC at 42°C. Cells were stained with DAPI (0.2 mg/ml).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Chromosome Painting in Buffalo Oocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The species-specific chromosome painting probes used in this study belonged to the collection of Pauciullo et al.22 (link),45 (link). In total, six probes were used. Five corresponding to the q-arms of sub-metacentric autosomes (1q, 2q, 3q, 4q and 5q) of river type buffalo (2n = 50) plus the heterosome X that mapped region q21-25.
Lymphocyte cell cultures from four buffalo bulls (two river and two swamp) were prepared according to the standard cytogenetic techniques46 (link). The buffaloes were karyotyped and were karyologically normal. Therefore, each probe was hybridised on metaphase plates for validation, first individually and then simultaneously with two sequential steps of FISH with three probes each. Only after this preliminary test the probes were used for oocyte analysis.
Each probe was labelled separately with Spectrum Orange-dUTP and Spectrum Green-dUTP (Abbott, USA) in a DOP-PCR reaction using 2 µl of the original probe template22 (link). The labelling scheme is reported in the Table 2.
Two sequential rounds of hybridisation were performed on the same slide. The whole FISH procedure including probe precipitation, probe and slides denaturation, incubation and washing steps were accomplished according to Pauciullo et al.22 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization with Microsatellite Probes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CGH and FISH with microsatellite motifs probes were conducted using methods described in our previous study [9] (link), [25] (link). For chromosome probes, we conducted FISH with slight modification. Chromosome probes were labelled by nick translation incorporating SpectrumGreen-dUTP (Abbott, North Chicago, Illinois, USA) or SpectrumOrange-dUTP (Abbott). Each labelled probe was precipitated with 20 µg glycogen as carrier, and dissolved in 15 µl hybridization buffer. The hybridization mixture was placed on a chromosome slide and sealed with a coverslip and rubber cement. Probe DNA and chromosome DNA were denatured by heating the slide on a heat plate at 68.5°C for 5 min. The slides were hybridized overnight in a humid chamber at 37°C. Hybridization was carried out for 2 days in cross-species chromosome painting. The slides were then washed by the following series: 0.4×SSC, 0.3% IGEPAL (Sigma-Aldrich) at 55°C for 2 min followed by 2×SSC, 0.1% IGEPAL at room temperature for 1 min. The slides were dehydrated by ethanol series and air-dried and then counterstained using 20 µg/ml DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole), 2×SSC and mounted with anti-fade medium, Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, California, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Microdissection and Whole Genome Amplification of B. atrox W Chromosome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We performed microdissection using an inverted phase-contrast microscope Zeiss Axiovert.A1 (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with Eppendorf TransferMan NK 2 micromanipulator (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). We prepared glass needles from 1.0 mm diameter capillary glass using a glass capillary puller, Sutter P-30 Micropipette Puller (Sutter Instrument, Novato, Calif., USA) and sterilized using ultraviolet irradiation. We microdissected a W chromosome from freshly prepared slides of a female B. atrox using a glass needle and the micromanipulation system, subsequently transferring the W chromosome into 0.2 ml PCR tubes. The W chromosome DNA (BaW) was amplified using GenomePlex Single Cell Whole Genome Amplification Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo., USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol with slight modifications according to70 (link). The volume of the reactions was scaled down to half, and the PCR amplification step was increased to 30 cycles. The W chromosome paint of B. atrox was labeled by nick translation means incorporating SpectrumGreen-dUTP (Abbott, North Chicago, Ill., USA). The hybridization was carried out for 1 day in the B. atrox chromosomes (control) and 3 days in cross-species chromosome painting (Boa constrictor male and female).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Chromosome-Linked Gene Mapping in Pogona

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We mapped Pogona vitticeps derived 8 BAC clones containing 8 chromosome-linked genes (WAC; KLF6; APTX; CHD1; CTNNB1; TAX1BP1; OPRD1/RCC1 and NR5A1)12 (link),19 (link),52 ,53 (link) to B. constrictor male and female metaphase chromosomes. The clones were selected from Pogona vitticeps genomic BAC library as previously described in Ezaz et al.12 (link),52 , Young et al.53 (link) and Deakin et al.19 (link). All 8 BACs were anchored to P. vitticeps metaphase chromosomes as control (data not shown). BAC DNA was extracted using the Promega Wizard Plus SV Minipreps DNA Purification System following the manufacturer’s protocol, with volumes scaled up for 15 ml cultures. The BACs were labeled with SpectrumOrange-dUTP or SpectrumGreen-dUTP (Abbott, North Chicago, Ill., USA) and hybridized for 2 days. The slides were then washed twice in 0.4 × SSC, 0.3% IGEPAL (Sigma-Aldrich) at 55 °C for 5 min each and after air-dried, counterstained using DAPI (1.2 µg/ml) and mounted in an antifade solution (Vector, Burlingame, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Assay for Detecting Kinase Rearrangements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A commercially available break-apart probe was used for ALK according to the manufacturer's protocol (Abbott, Des Plaines, IL). For ROS1, RET, NTRK1, and BRAF, break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes were prepared from BAC clones using standard procedures and labeled by nick translation with SpectrumGreen-dUTP and SpectrumRed-dUTP (Abbott, Des Plaines, IL). The following flanking BAC clones were used: RET (red: RP11-379D20, RP11-124O11; green: RP11-718J13, RP11-54P13), NTRK1 (red: RP11-284F21, RP11-66D17; green: RP11-1038N13, RP11-1059C21), ROS1 (red: RP11-379F24, RP11-103F10; green: RP11-1059G13, RP11-721K11), and BRAF (red: RP11-715H9, RP11-133N19; green: RP11-759K14, RP11-788O6). The probes were hybridized on 5μm-thick tissue sections, and the number and localization of the hybridization signals was assessed in a minimum of 100 interphase nuclei with well-delineated contours and at least 50% of neoplastic cells had to show a split signal to report a rearrangement of a kinase.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!