The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using anti snap23

1

Imaging Flow Cytometry for Immune Cell Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For imaging flow cytometry experiments: anti-CD8 APC-Cy7 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA or Tonbo Biosciences, San Diego, CA) and anti-CD56 PE-CF594 (BD Biosciences) were used for surface staining; all intracellular stains included anti-perforin D48 PE or BV421 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA) and anti-perforin δG9 FITC (Biolegend) and one of the following unconjugated antibodies: anti-CD71 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), anti-granzyme B (BD Biosciences), anti-rab3D (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), anti-rab4 (Pierce Antibodies, Waltham, MA), anti-rab5 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-rab7 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX), anti-rab8 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-rab11a (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-rab27a (Abcam), anti-rab35 (Abcam), anti-rab37 (Abcam), anti-syntaxin6 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-syntaxin7 (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN), anti-vti1b (Abcam), anti-VAMP3 (Abcam), anti-VAMP4 (Abcam), or anti-SNAP23 (Abcam). The unconjugated antibodies were detected using goat anti-rabbit AF647, chicken anti-goat AF647, or donkey anti-sheep AF647 secondary antibodies (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). For confocal microscopy, perforin D48 FITC (Abcam), perforin δG9 AF647 (Biolegend), and goat anti-rabbit or donkey anti-sheep AF568 secondary antibodies (Invitrogen) were used, along with the selected rab or SNARE antibody.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Hippocampal Protein Expression Analysis in Injured Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ipsilateral hippocampal tissues from sham and CCI injured mice were homogenized in RIPA buffer with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and benzonase nuclease (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA) and mixed by rocking at 4 °C for at least 15 min. Tissues were centrifuged, supernatant was recovered, samples were diluted and standardized to protein concentrations. Protein samples were separated on 8–10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Membranes were then blocked with 5% milk or 5% BSA in 0.1 M phosphate buffer with 0.1% Tween-20 for 1 h at room temperature (RT) and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies. Membranes were incubated for 1 h at RT with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA). Bands were visualized using SuperSignal substrate (ThermoScientific, Pittsburg, PA). The following primary antibodies were used: anti-GluR1, anti-NR1, anti-NR2B (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA), anti-GFAP (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), anti-SNAP25, anti-SNAP23 (ABCAM, Cambridge, MA) and anti-β-tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) antibodies. ImageJ was used to perform density analysis. Protein measurements were standardized to β-tubulin and normalized to average WT sham signals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Hippocampal Protein Expression Analysis in Injured Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ipsilateral hippocampal tissues from sham and CCI injured mice were homogenized in RIPA buffer with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and benzonase nuclease (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA) and mixed by rocking at 4 °C for at least 15 min. Tissues were centrifuged, supernatant was recovered, samples were diluted and standardized to protein concentrations. Protein samples were separated on 8–10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Membranes were then blocked with 5% milk or 5% BSA in 0.1 M phosphate buffer with 0.1% Tween-20 for 1 h at room temperature (RT) and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies. Membranes were incubated for 1 h at RT with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA). Bands were visualized using SuperSignal substrate (ThermoScientific, Pittsburg, PA). The following primary antibodies were used: anti-GluR1, anti-NR1, anti-NR2B (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA), anti-GFAP (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), anti-SNAP25, anti-SNAP23 (ABCAM, Cambridge, MA) and anti-β-tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) antibodies. ImageJ was used to perform density analysis. Protein measurements were standardized to β-tubulin and normalized to average WT sham signals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Mast Cell Degranulation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum (FBS), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), trypsin-ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA), and streptomycin/penicillin were purchased from Welgene (Daegu, Korea) and Gibco (Grand Island, NY, USA). Anti-DNP-IgE, bovine serum albumin (BSA), p-nitrophenyl-N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminide, DNCB, and 1-Iodo (1-iodohexadecane) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). DNP-BSA was purchased from Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) and TNF-α from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). Anti-SNAP23, anti-syntaxin 4, anti-VAMP8, anti-LOR, and anti-FLG antibodies were from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA), and the anti-β-actin antibodies were from Sigma-Aldrich. Anti-rabbit IgG HRP-conjugated and anti-mouse IgG HRP-conjugated antibodies were from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Adipocyte Differentiation and SNARE Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3T3-L1 fibroblasts were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and grown and differentiated into adipocytes as outlined (Roccisana et al., 2013 (link)). All anti-VAMP antibodies were from Synaptic Systems (Göttingen, Germany), anti-SNAP23 and anti-Syntaxin4 were from Abcam (Cambridge, United Kingdom), and all other antibodies were as described (Roccisana et al., 2013 (link)). GST-VAMPs 2 and 3 were as described (Millar et al., 1999 (link); Brandie et al., 2008 (link)). GST-VAMPs 4, 5, 7, and 8 were from Andrew Peden (University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!